Mr Dee

This is it exactly...how would we know?

Were you watching on French TV RDS, because things always seem to move better in a foreign language. I thought the short, quick passes saved his bacon because if he had to scramble or look downfield, he was in trouble. Balls were thrown all over the place. Even Sask. defenders couldn't get them. But when you don't play, it shows. (like we know anything about that)

Yeah, he can start the team bus. But not drive it though, he no longer can he come through in the clutch.

I'd start Hall next game because it makes sense to give him the same team he has already seen. But on that note, I don't know how any of out QBs can function in this system. Every game adjustments are made to us, but not by us. All our QBs ,going back to last year even, are doomed. I don't know if we'll ever know how good or bad they really are. On a brighter note, Aaron Woods looked strong.

That was one wacko crazy game that seemed like nobody wanted to win. To think Montreal almost won that game without Calvillo is amazing. Sask tried everything to lose that game but I guess Dressler wasn't told. He ran back that punt and gave them great field position. Well, we were waiting for Calvillo to go down to see what's behind them and whoa....well I won't say anything I can't back up....but speaking of back ups, I know a slightly used, experienced one they could get....cheap

Remind me again how Renaud is the only villain who can't hit the coffin corner.

Any chance Crowton (Hall monitor) steps aside to assist LaPolice on TSN? (they'd make a good team)

I believe Woods deserves a gooder sign. He's looking better and better. As for ugly...all those penalties. Traces back to coaching.

Hall, Mainor, Anderson, Bryant, Muamba, Wild, Dunn, Washington,Stewart beg to differ.

Psst, Bluto....

Still don't acknowledge that Parades has the consecutive FG record.

Speaking of grunts....the next sound you hear will be mine. Grunt

Well this is the whole deal isn't it? Somewhere between the brash style of Elliott and the teeth gnashing of the Coaching staff, there must have been a starting point to turn what was evidently some talent into a usable QB. Was it just immaturity? Were they pished that he, as 17 says, ignored their plays? (and made plays on his own) Let's face it...he brought excitement to our game. (until the red zone) Lack of patience? Who were the real dumb asses here? Let's just hope Hall will make us forget this ordeal.

I'm beginning to see a pattern here.

Yes but, other than that....

Listen, I was seriously beginning to wonder, whenever I read the post-game stats, whether Buck had changed his name or not. I kept seeing Buck Pierce incomplete pass, Buck Pierce incomplete pass, Buck Pierce incomplete pass....

Pardon me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me it should be the veteran QB with all the moxie, who is expected to come in and lead the team to at least a shot at victory. Isn't the veteran the guy we should feel comfortable with when he goes in...that we have a chance to move the ball effectively...get first downs...hit at least 3 different receivers...including hitting a 6-5" receiver? It's pretty sad that we have to use low stats to prove the lesser quarterback. It's really sad that it does prove the lesser quarterback.

I'd also check to make sure warranties will be honoured here in Canada. Some vehicle warranties are honoured and some aren't.

Thats's weird KBF, Twitter sources tell me you never had a problem with menus..

That's it then, we'll let his stats play the game, because Buck can't. And by the way, I'd guess his stats have been going steadily downhill recently.

Yes, I really wish we could make this happen. There really is no need to get all defensive about it.

Sure.....other teams' announcers would have asked at least a $200 dollar question.