CodyT

Sure I guess. The joke is that streveler would sign for that salary. No chance he's signing on for 125 k base. Walter's definitely has a reserve fund, it just may not be the man, the myth, the legend

Side note. I hate how our favourite site here has determined to us that only 2 threads is acceptable. Andrew Harris bashing the bombers falls into a one of 2 topics. I get that we want to keep it focused but I feel we lose discussion because people don't keep up page by page and want to chime in on certain things and not others. Big stories should have their own thread. How many times this month has trapper reiterated the same story we've been discussing for pages, days later. LOL I know this was discussed in the past but maybe we could rehash the topic? Ps lyle bauer is still trying to ruin the bombers

**** man I see your avatar and I think of ourbombers.com

This was my first reaction, too

125 k for Trevor Harris base salary is pretty damn good. I'm surprised the bombers weren't interested in that as an insurance to Zach

Why? Only team out there really willing to pay starter money would be bc... and they are doing... well whatever that situation is

I think he's the best back in the league. Considering Andrew's 35 but an NI I think 140 would be fair for both sides

I'm sad to be losing Darvin. My favorite current player. Comes up big when we needed it. As far as Harris goes. No tarnish to the legacy unless he ends up in Saskatchewan. I couldn't bare that. Lol Lawler at 300 k blows, but see ya later. I just noticed grant hasn't been signed and that to me would be an under the radar big loss

No that would be Lawler..

I retract my statement about milt being the only receiver worth 250 k. Zylstra is fantastic. Pipe dream though

No he's too old

I could see him sticking around the nfl still, no?

No doubt. + giving up the ni talent to the rest of the league. Naturally guys are going to want starter carries and we have 3 starters vying for touches for 1.5 running backs Side note- whatever happened to that tall canadian receiver that we drafted that got an nfl look? He was talked about a lot as being a game breaker one day but I haven't heard anything about him or can remember his name. He may have had an attitude problem ?

Johnny reminds of Fred Reid. Id like to see him as the feature back for a full year before id feel overly comfortable with your scenario though

Which you would think makes one of our ni rotational guys "disposable"

A

4.56 40 time to 4.29 for tyreek. Not to bash demski as I think he is a jack of all trades and a great cfl canadian player. But to mention those 2 guys even in the same breath is wild Id say brandon banks was a better comparison but even that is wowie

Lol @ peoole comparing demski to Tyrrell Hill. I've seen a lot of stretches on this website and that one is near the top

Any idea what he got?

Lol. And that conversation is over as fast as it started

I'm saying if they take Lawler off our hands then yeah they would be out. I'm only for the walker signing if we can't come to terms with lawler for a reasonable price

Who would take a run at walker? Calgary is out. Riders likely out. Montreal is out. Bc is out. Can't see Toronto being in based on previous history. Why would he go back to Edmonton? That leaves Hamilton Ottawa and Wpg

Fair point but that's not where I was headed with that. I meant as far as talent wise goes hes still up there with the elites in my opinion. To the poster saying he quit on his team. Remember the Tim burke blue bombers? A lot of similarities. Not saying that it's acceptable in pro sports but there are some mitigating factors that go into it

I caught flak earlier this week for rating walker still a top 5 receiver in this league. One bad year on a putrid offense doesn't mean he's had a major drop off. Id put in a sizeable offer to him (160-175 or so)

Well Milt shouldn't factor in as hes pretty much undisputed as the best pass catcher in cfl history. They wouldn't have paid milt that kind of money in his 3rd year in the league, I don't think. But I could be wrong