Blueandgold

Good for them. I like that we aren't peaking too early this year. We're an elite team in this league and we're going to kick the Ticats ass tonight.

Hmm now that Legget's healthy why not let him stay at SAM and play Fenner at HB?

Andrew Harris

Eric Rogers.

Honestly, BLM hasn’t been overly impressive to me all of last year or this year. He was great against the Argos this year, but the rest of his performances have ranged from “meh” to “solid”.

We were 11-7 and 12-6 the last two years respectively, finishing ahead of Edmonton each time. We are one of the elite teams of the league.

Demski and JSK had great games tonight. I never get sick of seeing us beat a team down.

Adams is so short as well, I doubt he can really see the guys coming in on those quick slants or ins over the middle as well. He was way too quick to try and leave the pocket. You can't attempt to roll out when the Esks are blitzing seven guys.

Man the Montreal receivers suck.

The marketing strategy is a good one here - They aren't necessarily targeting the best players, just big names who can potentially get people to tune in. But you aren't wrong, every league sans the NFL and CFL(and I guess arena league) has been a massive failure.

The league doesn't need more challenges. One a game is plenty. What the league does need is for the "eye in the sky" to overturn painfully obvious calls that a challenge shouldn't be wasted on.

Definitely, and one has to wonder how many of those sacks were against the rookie Streveler and how many have been against Nichols. I would bet at least five or six of those sacks have been on Streveler.

I'm personally not a big fan of back to backs aside from Labour Day. Its kind of crazy we finish up with Toronto after seven games before we play Ottawa once, or that we play BC twice in a row before we play Calgary once.

Not to mention that Calgary is 29.6 PPG and we're at 33.2. It's nice being the only team in the league to average over 30 a game. Despite our record (and the second half in BC), this year has gone better than I expected when Nichols went down.

Only because yet they've played the Bombers .

Nope twitter is blocked at work. With that being said, I stand by my statement. That Bomber debt will have to be "forgiven" eventually.

We all knew this day would come eventually. There's no way the Bombers could ever pay off the principal of that loan. The interest payments alone were enough.

Lankford never had fans to begin with. The majority of us have been commenting on his mediocre skills as a football player since we signed him.

You can't possibly even attempt to compare Flanders and Demski based off of stats. Flanders takes his runs like a traditional running back, while Demski takes his off of sweeps, end around and trick plays.

As a Flanders fan, I look forward to seeing what Tompkins can do. I'm just happy we aren't inserting Lankford.

Lemon has to be a guy who's played for almost every team in the league by now. If my memory serves me correctly, he's done Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatchewan, Ottawa, Toronto, and now BC. Just missing Hamilton & Montreal.

Seriously... they can't knock a commercial or two off to do these interviews during stoppages in play instead?

We don't have the depth to start three Canadian receivers. If we had a healthy Matt Coates it's something I would be willing to consider, but having Peterman back up three guys doesn't sound great. I really hope we don't replace Bowman with Lankford. That's a sideways move if I've ever heard of one.

This was determined a long, long, long time ago.

Nichol's has been great despite a lackluster receiving core. We need to get a legit number two receiver to replace Bowman.