The Unknown Poster

I do enjoy a Sals nip. You'll usually find a gaggle of pro wrestlers at the Fermor location after our events. Hits the spot after a show! I enjoy Tony Roma's too. Im in the south so ours is safe. Every so often there is an urge for an onion loaf. They once delivered me one without the sauce and when I called Skip to complain they asked what the big deal was since I had the loaf. No sauce = no loaf!

Yeah and the Wisconsin one isnt a big victory either as it was a big Trump district, filled a seat held by a Republican and the winner was several points down from previous. But the spindoctors will spin.

I wonder if Trump still wants to throw out the mail in votes in California, or only when Democrats win? A shame that result since its Katie Hill's old seat and she was shamed out of office. Disgusting.

This is fascinating! Love it. Thanks for posting.

I laughed.

Justice may yet be served I guess this means, even if it’s dismissed, that some other opinions, perhaps scathing, may get on the record and widely heard.

There were country folk from Arkansas...pissed off the elite establishment. And yeah, theres a great book, I think Toobin write it, about the witch hunt into Clinton. They would have impeached him for parking tickets if they had to. Its funny because the Clintons are probably the most investigated politicians in America and yet...nothing. If Trump had to stand up to a fraction of the same scrutiny he'd be in jail for several lifetimes.

I wonder if there will be a race by cities or states to declare themselves open to lure major league sports. We'd heard that Arizona was one of the places considered for some of these leagues to play...this makes that easier.

I assume HBO Max will have G rated content too. I was being somewhat facetious but an unrated Head of the Class revival would be fun.

Thats not really their job. They're not deciding if Congress has a right to ask. Congress has the right under the constitution. It was inherent as a check and balance. SCOTUS is deciding whether Trump and/or the entities involved can refuse. You're twisting this to make it about Congress when it's about Trump. You like to bring up Clinton so if you want to use a witch hunt over a BJ as the standard by which Congress can investigate a President, that wont turn out well for your boy.

There is a good chance they will find the finance committee is over reaching. But the House Intelligence committee has an obvious need for the information. And while they'd likely find that a higher standard should exist when it involves the President, the Manhatten DA has surely reached that standard. They could kick back on that one. But they still have the Paula Jones precedent to deal with.

I think the point of discussion is either like minded people engaging in a discussion about a subject that interests them or those who are not like minded engaging in a debate about their point, hopefully open-mindedly. But you've shown zero propensity to be open minded at all. You're fully on the Trump crazy train. Also, let me be clear that not every opposing view is worthy if debate or discussion. Aligned values with sexual abusers, racists etc are not open to "difference of opinion". In my opinion.

With Head of the Class being on HBO is it too much to hope for that it's a hard R rated sitcom?? lol

You cant see reality through your orange goggles. If you cant see the problem here is you, then you're a lost cause unfortunately.

There is when they are subpoenaed by congress. This issue isnt whether they;re allowed to ask, its whether Trump is allowed to say no. The reason its at SCOTUS is because every level of judiciary has said he cannot say no. You do know that, dont you? Again, you're defending the guy you claim you dont like and cant defend. lol

Its really the fundamental issue. Is the President above the law. Hard to imagine SCOTUS saying he is as it gives the Presidency dictatorial powers forever. If if the right leaning Justices got for it, and you expect your SCOTUS justices to be above politics, hard to fathom Roberts goes along.

That’s true. Very good.

What does Clinton’s impeachment have to do with trumps? They were both impeached. Why are you trying to deflect discussion to clinton? Does any criticism of trump sting you that personally?

I think Clinton sitting for a deposition is a pretty good precedent that the President is not above the law. How can GOP argue differently?

Did you consider the possibility that he wasnt guilty? Like many Republicans also thought? Also you said the vote was purely partisan which it wasnt. You were wrong.

What is wrong with you? 10 Republicans voted not guilty on one count and 5 on the other. And feel free. Im sure you've talked to them a lot lately.

You probably think OJ Simpson didnt do it.