pigseye

I'm going to go out on a limb and say 5 - 4 in favor of not having to reveal them.

Yet, none of what you just said was worthy of going into the articles of impeachment? Funny how that works.

PETA thought it was okay.

Nothing that warranted being added to the articles of impeachment though, according to Schiff.

31.8K people are talking about this

I completely agree, there was nothing in the Meuller Report worthy of impeachment, which is why they didn't include anything from it. That wasn't so hard now was it.

10-4

And it's clear the Democrats considered the possible instances of obstruction cited in the Mueller Report for their impeachment charges and decided against them, because as Schiff said, not enough evidence to support a charge, no spin, just the facts amigo.

Now, now, just as long as the facts are proven to be accurate, we don't have to go bashing left or right leaning spin sources.

You guys set the standard, now we all get to play by the same rules.

I never understood this argument, even the Democrats wouldn't include the obstruction charges in their articles of impeachment, despite the Mueller Report citing 10 or 11 potential instances of obstruction. Even Schiff admitted that there just wasn't enough evidence to include even one obstruction charge, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/democrats-split-whether-include-mueller-obstruction-articles-impeachment-n1097766

garbage site, LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate AlterNet far Left Biased based on story selection and wording that always favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a few failed fact checks as well as the promotion of pseudoscience. Detailed Report Factual Reporting: MIXED

As long as the same standard of factual reporting is given to all sources going forward, then I am okay with that.

aka fake news, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/ LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to half-true, false and unproven claims, as well as promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation.

Better check your source, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/ LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. aka fake news.

Maybe a few puffs is all you need?

I was wondering when this was going to come out, https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/colby-cosh-where-theres-smoke-—-the-cigarettes-and-covid-story-is-growing-harder-to-ignore/ar-BB13UFrJ?ocid=spartandhp My mom who is 80 and a lifetime smoker had the covid and recovered, maybe just lucky but my sister is a nurse at St B and was intubating those in ICU and said none were smokers, pretty hard to ignore as the article suggests.

Dam Fox News, faking the congressional transcripts and the interview with MSNBC, just no level they won't stoop too.

Wow, Trumps team is having a field day with the transcripts, confirming the Dems lied to the media about evidence of collusion when it came time to testify to congress https://www.foxnews.com/politics Evelyn Farkas, a former Obama administration official who previously encouraged congressional staffers to gather evidence of alleged collusion between President Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia and said she "knew" there was additional such information out there, admitted she did not know such information existed in a 2017 interview with congressional investigators.

Great news for the polar bears, too bad it cost Dr. Crockford her job for speaking the truth, https://polarbearscience.com/2020/05/08/sea-ice-more-than-1-2m-thick-over-hudson-bay-portends-a-good-year-for-polar-bears/

To what end? To completely embarrass the FBI for bungling the investigation. For having to dismiss two of their investigators on the case for tweeting disparaging comments about Trump? This thing is a hand grenade, no wonder nobody wants to touch it.

How can you over look this from DOD's link above? The immediate predicate of the government’s move to dismiss the charges today was the release in April of FBI notes about its interviews with Flynn. Among the notes, an unidentified FBI employee wrote, “What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” The notes are the latest example of dubious FBI behavior. As a recent Justice Department inspector-general report found, the FBI has repeatedly abused rules for obtaining warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. As I have written repeatedly during the Trump administration, the FBI’s long record of abuse means that its statements cannot be taken at face value; the bureau will look out for its own interests, and break the rules to do so if it must. No sane judge would continue with a case like this.

God the man can write, whether you agree with him or not, https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/rex-murphy-only-the-greens-and-separatists-could-find-opportunity-in-a-pandemic/ar-BB13NSBw?ocid=spartandhp

And once again you are putting words in my mouth to justify your position, thanks but no thanks.

I guess that is still up to the judge according this left leaning source anyways, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/us/politics/michael-flynn-case-dropped.html It is now up to the federal judge in Washington overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan, to decide whether to dismiss it and close off the possibility that Mr. Flynn could be tried again for the same crime. If the judge wants, he could ask for written submissions and hold a hearing on that topic.