pigseye

Biden Reade for example?

Junk Science, sounds like a good one, I will give it a try.

Holy ****, I never thought anyone on here would admit that the left is just as guilty. I salute you sir.

You don't appear to know what pseudoscience and conspiracy are so here are a few examples, https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/50-years-of-doomsday-climate-change-predictions-that-didnt-come-true/ https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/jarrett-stepman/5-dire-climate-predictions-never-came-true https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

NoTricksZone often publishes stories with emotional wording to influence the reader. For example, they often use the term “alarmist” to describe those who support the consensus of science such as this: Alarmist Scientist “Way Off Target” …Arctic Sea Ice/European Winter Claim Refuted By Newly Published Study. They also attempt to personally discredit people based on character traits such as this: Expert Psychiatrist: Greta Being “Misused For Interests” …Parents’ Promotion Of Troubled Child “Ethically Problematic”. When it comes to climate science, they often publish alternative theories for global warming such as sun spots. They also offer a blogroll that consists of other climate skeptics such as the Climate Depot, Judith Curry and Climate Dispatch. In general, NoTricksZone is a human influenced climate change denial pseudoscience website. A factual search reveals they have failed a few fact checks. Hundreds of papers published in 2017 prove that global warming is a myth. – FALSE A total of 58 peer-reviewed papers published in the first half of 2017 conclude that global warming is a myth. – FALSE New research shows that scientists are manipulating sea level data to inflate predictions of future sea level rise. – FALSE Overall, we rate NoTricksZone a pseudoscience blog based on the publication of climate change disinformation opposing the consensus of science. (D. Van Zandt 11/9/2019) Source: https://notrickszone.com/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379118305705 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379119310595 Care to comment on the science? Or would you rather just hurl insults all day.

I'm not missing anything, you are the one suggesting that the facts are misleading because of who is presenting them, so please, go ahead and show me how they are misleading the facts. Appears to me that you are dismissing the facts because of who is presenting them, without ever looking at the facts to begin with.

From Media Bias Fact Check president Dave Van Zandt to Just Facts president Jim Agresti 4/29/17 Good Morning James, Sorry for the delay in getting the Just Facts site re-reviewed. I am sure you can appreciate how busy we are. First, I want to apologize for the previous review. The reviewer clearly zeroed in on one issue and did not look at the big picture. I feel in my review I did do that. I removed that review and replaced it with mine. I also have another reviewer working on your website. In our communication we are on the same page. I will add his notes when he completes them. Here is the new review: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-facts/ I also reviewed Just Facts Daily, which you can view here. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-facts-daily/ I would appreciate it if you would address the fact that we did re-review your website and made appropriate changes. I don’t expect you to remove your article, but I would greatly appreciate you changing the headline to something less inflammatory. Sincerely, Dave Factual Reporting: HIGH What more do you need? The factual reporting is high, who cares if they lean slightly left or right, do not fall into the same trap that most of the sheep on here have.

https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/

Man there are some really good studies coming out lately, people really do need to keep up with the times, Greenland, for example, warmed by 8 to 16°C “within decades or less” 20 or more times during the last 80,000 years (Li et al., 2019). The warming and cooling events may have occurred in the absence of an external an forcing mechanism; instead, they were an “unforced oscillation”. The abrupt climate changes extended throughout the Northern Hemisphere and even into the Southern Hemisphere. A new study (Lopez-Saez et al., 2020) of the Late-Glacial-Early-Holocene period (about 15,000 to 11,500 years ago) analyzes evidence of tree cover transitions in the western Iberian region (Spain). Deciduous oak forests were assessed to have abruptly expanded and declined during this period. The established temperature tolerances for this tree species suggest the warming-cooling transitions occurred within decades to centuries, and the climate change amplitudes could reach 2-4°C. Despite the low and modestly fluctuating CO2 concentrations during this Late-Glacial period (~250 ppm), the evidence suggests regional temperatures were warmer than today 13.9, 12.3, 11.5-11.3, and 10.9 ka cal BP (thousand calibrated years before present). These pronounced natural climate change events in the paleoclimate record do not support the contention that modern temperture changes are unusual or unprecedented.

For discussion purposes only, https://www.justfacts.com/news_covid-19_anxiety_lockdowns_life_destroyed_saved

Caption Montage of the computer simulation of two merging neutron stars that blends over with an image from heavy-ion collisions to highlight the connection of astrophysics with nuclear physics. https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/230638.php

Just too funny not to share https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/05/05/are-the-russians-in-the-room-right-now-mann-implies-moore-is-russian-stooge/

Ha ha, it's not us! https://www.msn.com/en-ca/weather/topstories/montreal-in-for-chilly-weather-most-of-the-week-amid-frost-advisory/ar-BB13CIcn?ocid=spartandhp

Here's the full details of the program, not as good as many in the industry were hoping for, https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/dollar252m-emergency-aid-package-coming-for-farmers-food-plants-hit-by-covid-19/ar-BB13CICj?ocid=spartanntp

The dossier was developed by the 'five eyes' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/wellness/20-things-to-know-about-farts/ss-BB13iOoB?ocid=spartandhp 20 things to know about farts

So this is their solution? https://burnedthemovie.com/

The world is full of kings and queens who blind you eyes and steal your dreams it's heaven and hell

Privately, some Democrats are now lamenting the standard they set in 2018, saying it has backfired now that Biden has been accused. "We set up a standard we can't live by. No one likes to discuss it but it's the reality," said one Democratic strategist who requested anonymity to talk candidly. "It looks terrible for him and for the party. You can't say you believe women and then take it all back because it doesn't apply to you." The Dems have already made my case for me, I don't need to add opinion.

Trying to deflect are we, try to stay on topic, we are discussing Biden Reade and the standard the Dems have set in prior cases.

Are you referring to the attacks on me personally? If so, how is that an opinion?

And you keep singing the same tune, is that the Fat Lady Singing I hear?

It's in the link, not my head Privately, some Democrats are now lamenting the standard they set in 2018, saying it has backfired now that Biden has been accused. "We set up a standard we can't live by. No one likes to discuss it but it's the reality," said one Democratic strategist who requested anonymity to talk candidly. "It looks terrible for him and for the party. You can't say you believe women and then take it all back because it doesn't apply to you."

Going to put this here as it would just get deleted in the Covid-19 thread, https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/coronavirus/bombshell-dossier-lays-out-case-against-chinese-bat-virus-program/news-story/55add857058731c9c71c0e96ad17da60 The 15-page research document, obtained by The Saturday Telegraph, lays the foundation for the case of negligence being mounted against China.

Dems have admitted they set a double standard, you give it up, nobody is fooled at your attempts to attack the poster instead of the post, the classic sign you are out of ammunition.