pigseye

Nice to see it only took 1 quarter for the Bombers to figure out what the RB's were doing. If they had film to prepare this wouldn't have been much of a game. This was probably Ottawa's best chance for a win this season unless they can acquire some decent receivers for Henry.

Too early. Yeah but it's so nice to be able to ask the question for a change.

It's been bugging me watching Willy because he reminded me of a former Bomber QB and it finally came to me last night, Sean Salisbury 2.0. And complete arrogance on the part of Milanovich continuing to try to pass against that defence without establishing the run, a very poor coaching effort all around by the Argos.

I said it before, for the way they are managing the ratio, they have enough bodies. If Watson is out for any length of time though, expect them to bring back a cut.

Not good enough to play man and not experienced enough switch off in a zone, very familiar indeed.

Even though TO was just awful in this game, the Bombers still made them pay for it so I'm hopeful that this wasn't just a fluky performance.

FTFY I don't think we'll give up any long TD runs but plenty of mid range ones. Ray is going to have a ridiculous completion percentage too but it will all be nickel and dime stuff. This defence is built to stop the big play while forcing you to march it down the field, nothing Ray hasn't done before. I think you might be a little surprised, pleasantly or unpleasantly depending on the result, at the amount of pressure. I'm expecting a lot of zone, but a lot of blitzing in front of it. I'm sure we'll see a variety of blitz's too but if this defence stays true to form passing is what it's designed to defend against. If we give up big pass plays in a pass heavy defence...I won't know what to think.

FTFY I don't think we'll give up any long TD runs but plenty of mid range ones. Ray is going to have a ridiculous completion percentage too but it will all be nickel and dime stuff. This defence is built to stop the big play while forcing you to march it down the field, nothing Ray hasn't done before.

If we can start 4 Natl on the OL, we can start 4 Intl on the DL (Anderson instead of Thomas) and we can add 1 more Intl DL as DI. I think that would be an upgrade already. Better still to start 5 on the lines freeing up more spots for I at the skill positions. The value of having an extra "skilled" receiver might be lower than you think. When Willy is on the IR. Well if you're going to hang him out to dry, then any QB will end up on the IR, backs and receivers have to block too it's the evolution of the game, except for Burke, nobody just rushes 4 anymore.

You are going to need more than 4 RB's for the game bluto, they will be exhausted by the half.

If we can start 4 Natl on the OL, we can start 4 Intl on the DL (Anderson instead of Thomas) and we can add 1 more Intl DL as DI. I think that would be an upgrade already. Better still to start 5 on the lines freeing up more spots for I at the skill positions.

Nice, now find one for the other line.

Somebody help me out here, I always get confused with the difference in CFL and NFL: 5 DB's nickel 6 DB's dime 7 DB's quarter 8 DB's dollar

Tyrone Carrier.....oh wait....

I think what they are suggesting is that there were 44 OTHER players who stuck it out to the bitter end and were 1 Mike Bishop pick away from hosting the ESF, those guys were the professionals, not the quiters.

Looking at our import receivers on the 46 man roster Moore Denmark Kelly Woods this signing makes perfect sense, considering.

A lot of hot air, when I read the part about the spring melt water damaging things at the stadium I realized the writer isn't as smart as he thinks he is, that turned out not to be the source of the water damage at all.

Ian Wild? Wild will be rotating with Kuale at MLB. I could live with playing both, similar to what BC is doing with Sol & Bighill but neither EK or IW are straight up MLB'ers. This won't end well.

You mean aside from DT...? And one backup for two NI REC spots... Sure, according to some, we should disregard what the roster is telling us and just assume that guys can play any position. No what you should do is stop pretending a roster for fan consumption is some kind of end all be all determining factor on where guys are capable of playing. Oh I agree, Cauchy played safety for almost 2 years, doesn't mean he should have. If it walks like a duck, it's probably a duck.

Interesting move.

and the rich just keep on getting richer.

Silly complaint, who cares what the roster on a website says. Unamba and Dunn have been linebackers all throughout camp. 3 of those guys are Canadian special teamers. Suddenly 11 is 6, right where it should be. And neither guy should be lining up at LB but with that logic, any DB on the roster could play LB'er which is what this defence is being constructed around, never mind that our only Nat DE isn't and weighs less than Kuale. Gotta love the smaller faster theme which has been taken to a whole new level.

You mean aside from DT...? And one backup for two NI REC spots... Sure, according to some, we should disregard what the roster is telling us and just assume that guys can play any position.

Enough for the way they are working the ratio of now.

11 DB's on the 46 man roster....time for MO to tell Etch to get a grip.