pigseye

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Nobody's that stupid.

I'll ask again, what was the crime in the articles of impeachment he is referring too?

I googled that nothing comes up.

He alleged there was a crime I asked him what it was, where's the problem?

That's funny I don't recall the articles of impeachment charging him any specific crime? You have been reading false news again.

If Cohen HAD named Trump then Trump would be named as a co-conspirator even if he couldn't be charged. Cohen didn't name him, so Trump can't be named as a co-conspirator in the crime, that is what the law says and what was discussed at length when Cohen rolled over on him. Now do you see the difference? Once again false news making **** up that never happened.

He can be named in the charges, even if he can't be charged.

Cohen didn't name him so he can't be named as a co-conspirator, never mind being charged.

Porn star hush money again, that's all you got after 4 years of constant investigations and Cohen didn't name him so he can't be charged, end of story.

Cohen didn't specifically name him although everyone knows he paid the porn stars hush money. Almost 4 years of investigation and that is all they could dig up? Trump is so corrupt but after 4 years of constant investigating they can't even name him in the charge because Cohen wouldn't name Trump in his plea deal. Yeah that Trump, he's some sort of big time criminal. lol.

lol, for campaign finance violations, ooh scary stuff, better impeach.

Considering Trump has been investigated from day 1 of his presidency, how do you rationalize that he hasn't been charged with anything? My guess is he pushes the envelope to the very edge without actually breaking any laws which is what drives Democrats crazy?

CNN is starting to get it, ratings must be slipping or something, https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/democrats-need-to-stop-pretending-they-live-in-a-dictatorship-opinion/ar-BBZXTAh?ocid=spartanntp

Yes, the GOP would still hold the presidency but would likely lose the next election without Trump. Big difference that you seemed to just skip right over.

No you don't just go to wiki and read it for yourself Sanders described himself as a "democratic socialist"[5] and an admirer of aspects of social democracy as practiced in the Scandinavian countries

Are you deluded? He's a self proclaimed social democrat, wants broad based social programs for everyone funded by taxation, basically a Canadian not your average American even by Democrats standards.

Paul's record in Winnipeg 264-186-53 pretty darn good actually.

The Democrats are absolutely lost if Sanders is the best they can muster up. The vast majority of Democrats are still centric and Bernie is just too far left for them. What a bunch of losers.

This should help you sleep better at night, the IPCC is dialing back their 'worst case scenario' as the evidence starts to pile up against them, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00177-3 Not trying to be a **** but this is good news that everyone should agree on. RCP8.5 was intended to explore an unlikely high-risk future2. But it has been widely used by some experts, policymakers and the media as something else entirely: as a likely ‘business as usual’ outcome. A sizeable portion of the literature on climate impacts refers to RCP8.5 as business as usual, implying that it is probable in the absence of stringent climate mitigation. The media then often amplifies this message, sometimes without communicating the nuances. This results in further confusion regarding probable emissions outcomes, because many climate researchers are not familiar with the details of these scenarios in the energy-modelling literature. This is particularly problematic when the worst-case scenario is contrasted with the most optimistic one, especially in high-profile scholarly work. This includes studies by the IPCC, such as AR5 and last year’s special report on the impact of climate change on the ocean and cryosphere4. The focus becomes the extremes, rather than the multitude of more likely pathways in between. Happily — and that’s a word we climatologists rarely get to use — the world imagined in RCP8.5 is one that, in our view, becomes increasingly implausible with every passing year5. Emission pathways to get to RCP8.5 generally require an unprecedented fivefold increase in coal use by the end of the century, an amount larger than some estimates of recoverable coal reserves6. It is thought that global coal use peaked in 2013, and although increases are still possible, many energy forecasts expect it to flatline over the next few decades7. Furthermore, the falling cost of clean energy sources is a trend that is unlikely to reverse, even in the absence of new climate policies7. Assessment of current policies suggests that the world is on course for around 3 °C of warming above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century — still a catastrophic outcome, but a long way from 5 °C7,8. We cannot settle for 3 °C; nor should we dismiss progress.

Facts are facts no matter who is telling them. That's your problem, you only listen to what you want hear.

Nobody, even NOAA and NASA, dispute the cooling, try doing a little research, Here we use a stacked temperature record to show an absence of regional warming since the late 1990s. The annual mean temperature has decreased at a statistically significant rate, with the most rapid cooling during the Austral summer. Temperatures have decreased as a consequence of a greater frequency of cold, east-to-southeasterly winds, resulting from more cyclonic conditions in the northern Weddell Sea associated with a strengthening mid-latitude jet. These circulation changes have also increased the advection of sea ice towards the east coast of the peninsula, amplifying their effects. Our findings cover only 1% of the Antarctic continent and emphasize that decadal temperature changes in this region are not primarily associated with the drivers of global temperature change but, rather, reflect the extreme natural internal variability of the regional atmospheric circulation. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature18645

Rangers top 6 owned us, they are very talented, Jets aren't that team anymore and have to grind things out but not everyone has bought in. I can see a block buster shake up coming.

13 of 13 Antarctic Peninsula and nearby island stations show cooling over the past 21 years. There hasn’t been any warming there so far this century. Data source: NASA GISS, Version 4 unadjusted.

David Bromwich, a climate researcher at Ohio State University, noted, however, that while the Antarctic Peninsula has warmed strongly since the late 1940s, temperature trends in summer have been variable in recent decades, including a brief cooling spell since 1998. “So overall, this record looks to be a one time extreme event that doesn’t tell us anything about Antarctic climate change,” he wrote in an email.