GCn20
Members-
Posts
7,630 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by GCn20
-
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I hope he fails miserably. Nothing personal against Buck..but it's the only way he can now help the Bombers. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Definitely some very odd coordinating in the past 2 Grey Cups for sure. RIchie was awful in 23, and Buck was terrible this year. As for other coaching issues, there were mistakes, but nothing that should have cost us the game but did not help for sure. No ya buts....this year especially the preparation seemed lacking. Amar says SMS what SMS? They likely blew up their draft this year so they cannot afford to be bleeding starting NATs now. Money will have to come from Peter to pay Paul, but Betts was pretty much a must re-sign. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I do get it. I just don't believe that one has to starve in order to be considered making less than a living wage. You and I have fundamental differences on what that term means I guess. Are the players attending soup kitchens..no...are they financially struggling at 70k a year...yep...many are. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Fajardo is getting into the best case scenario for himself really. One could argue the Riders might be, because Trevor Harris is almost certainly not going to last the season at age 40, but playing behind an extremely over rated NAT is probably the surest bet. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Why would it irk you? 70k is not a high salary in this day and age. If people get by on less, good for them but that doesn't make the point less valid. I guess it all depends on what you consider a living wage to be. Winnipeg and Saskatchewan the min salary may allow some breathing room, but places like Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, Hamilton a 70k salary barely pays minimum expenses. Over half the league plays on a minimum or close to minimum contract, and many guys only a partial min salary between regular game cheques and PR money. This is the economic reality of the CFL and has been for a long time. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Exactly right. Heck even a person making 70k as a CDN resident with a modest house and a modest vehicle is pay cheque to pay cheque these days. It's what 2k biweekly take home or something like that? For sure the meals and services provided by the club are very important. Also these guys are beating the crap out of their bodies for that. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Highly likely he will be released. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
This is the CFL, no one is going to get straight A's across the board. Half the league doesn't make a living wage. Especially when you have the diversity of caloric intake just within the room. The big guys eat a lot different from the skill guys. The meals served are good. Gotta remember that when an OL or DL doesn't get half a cow on a plate, or a receiver doesn't get his kale and blueberry protein shake 6 times a day they hold it against the team. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Meh...depth I would think. He was gassed and got burned badly for like 3 straight games before we went away from him. OC's picked up on it and we were getting torched. IIRC his gassing problem was due to bad asthma. Would be a great guy to have to rotate in though. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
A pretty good report card overall. A few minor things to work out but nothing crazy. Players overall like the atmosphere of the team. A few minor wrinkles to work out but nothing that isn't easily and cheaply remedied. I'm not surprised by the grade for management. Walters can be a pretty tough cookie in negs. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
It's quite possible they haven't started interviewing yet. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Mileage is pretty low on him though. He was a backup for half of that time. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
The difference is Greene could not make most of the throws, and Fajardo can only make some of the throws. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Zach and the receivers were definitely not on the same page in scramble rules at the beginning of the season. He was guessing where they were going to go, and he was guessing wrong more often than not. ZC excels on extending the play but when that happens receivers and QBs have got to be thinking on the same wavelength. Takes a while for that to happen. ZC and KW, KC, and OW just weren't on the same page quite often until around game 7-8. Yea...Wilson and KW ran some great routes and made some big plays, but they were not a result of extending a play. That was our downfall, and Buck really should have given the marching orders to be more conservative until the chemistry was there. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Not last year. A guy like Harris or BLM would have been crushed behind our first 6 games OL. After that....yea probably be a few QBs that would have great seasons with us. Zach got into his own head for a while last year trying to do too much. If he chucks and ducks into the third row 8-10 times more last year instead of forcing things we probably win a couple of those early season losses. I know that sounds Matt Nichols like, but when you have our defence, all you gotta do is protect the ball and not give the game away. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Make Doman look like a spend thrift. 20-0 should be the goal. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
A ton of that falls on our OL, especially early in the year, and our rotating door of rookie receivers. He got better as the season went on as the OL gelled and the new receivers worked out the kinks. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Blow the wad, screw the SMS, do what it takes. Keep our good players, be active in FA this year, bring in blue chip recruits. This is our all in year. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Yea...could happen. With the plethora of good backups on the market this year, I would hope KW is going to grab us one of them. Football championships are always a collective effort. No doubt about that. However, some QBs tend to be able to lead their teams to more of them than others even if the stats don't necessarily show it. Sometimes its the timeliness of a play, for instance, or just a few minutes of greatness that make the difference between a VA and a ZC. Love him or hate him, I would take Fajardo as our back up for that reason. He sucks as a QB, but occasionally he gets hot and as Grey Cup 23 taught us he can sometimes get hot at exactly the right time. As a starter I wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole, but coming in off the bench he's a guy that might just win you the game if your starter goes down. All you ask from a backup. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Our guy has cup rings. VA...not so much. If/when VA puts those on his resume he can likely get ZC money. Teams don't pay 600-700k unless MOPs and GCs are on your resume. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Definitely. Grey Cup 25. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Definitely not an overpay, but not exactly a discount either. Pretty fair deal for both sides imo. -
2024/2025 Blue Bombers Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to TBURGESS's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I don't care when the Bombers get it done this offseason....just get it done. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
It all depends on how much Prime is willing to pay. I doubt that it would be huge revenue streams for them or the CFL. Much needed exposure though. -
2024/2025 CFL (non-Bomber) Off-Season Thread
GCn20 replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
What does publically have to do with anything related to his leadership in the dressing room? I agree. FIFO is well entrenched and isn't slipping one iota. Young guys will need to step up, and they will as they become the veterans. It isn't a problem. We have problems...don't get me wrong...but FIFO declining isn't one of them.