Jump to content

GCn20

Members
  • Posts

    7,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by GCn20

  1. I was led to believe that wild conspiracy theories were the exclusive domain of the far right. Imagine my chagrin right now.
  2. Maybe Wayne is incorrect, but he made a zillion dollars off of it and Shoen is pronounced Shane in pop culture because of it. Therefore the Showen argument is irrelevant, because once Wayne changed it and set the world on fire with the possibly incorrect pronunciation it follows that anyone with the name Shoen was doomed to have Danke jokes levied at them ad nauseum. Any Danke Shoen jokes at our new receiver, and there will be a crap load of them, are fair game.
  3. Kinda where I am at too. I was very unhappy at the time but a couple Grey Cups have smoothed things over for me.
  4. Sounds familiar to Manitobans.
  5. I don't know if it was or wasn't, but I find it extremely hard to believe any person capable of achieving the status of GM in a pro football league would make such a trade at any time without being forced to do so. One can spin that into conspiracy theory if they want, but unless Tillman was suffering from temporary insanity I believe his had was forced by someone within or outside the organization. I'm not a huge Tillman fan, but c'mon.
  6. I am still holding a bit of a grudge against Bauming for his role in the Harris snub in 2019, but I must confess up to that point I enjoyed his reporting and have liked the Bonfire as well. Good luck! It is great to see some really good and interesting CFL coverage whenever, and wherever, it comes from.
  7. There is a reason that the Riders are paying almost ten percent of their payroll to two jump ball specialist receivers.
  8. I understand academia quite well. I just strongly believe that academia is out to lunch. But just for shits and giggles here is one from the Fraser Institute citing several studies that counter your argument. You will no doubt miss that point though, and claim the Fraser Institute is a biased right wing think tank even though they have cited credible sources to their opinion. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/minimum-wages-dont-help-poor
  9. There is nothing personal or anecdotal about how small businesses in the real world react to wage increases. Every business lobby has been screaming it from the rooftops to the socialists that would offload governmental responsibility to the business sector. Keep on dragging up absurd comparisons, they do not make your case any more compelling.
  10. Sorry man but it is my belief that if it is not personal experience then it can ONLY be anecdotal. Evidence is not theoretical, it is real life experience. I am shocked by how many of you disregard that. For every piece of evidence you provide I can provide an equally compelling piece of evidence by an equally credible source. The problem with that is you will call it biased when it doesn't fit your narrative. Therefore, I will stick to my personal experience gained over 30 years of being a business owner in this province and from the network of colleagues who, by the way, agree entirely with what I'm saying. Have you ever ran a business yourself? Was your experience different? These are the only things that are credible to me, not university professors pontificating over sets of values that are unrealistic and set up with parameters that quite frankly rarely exist in the real world. Anyone can spin their study to say anything they want it to say by whoever is paying for them to do the study. That's the difference between academia and the real world and why I hold very little respect of the opinions of such studies. That being said I could probably provide a thousand links from academics that will counter your point but again, it will mean little, because these studies are produced to promote the viewpoints of those that sponsor them. The problem with the studies you promote, and academia really loves to produce, is that the economists assume businesses can survive the disruption created before the stabilization and that is idiotic because most small businesses do not have this kind of war chest to fall back on.
  11. What a bunch of know nothing horse **** that is. You don't know me, you don't know my businesses and you are completely out to lunch on what I paid. Downloading cost to everyone else? That is precisely what vast increases to any wage legislation does. I had several businesses over the years, most succeeded, some did not. I worked on a 10% margin as most in the hospitality industry do. You think business owners are carrying millions of dollars to the bank? Sure, the corporations do....some of them....but the single biggest employer in Manitoba is small business and you are smoking crack if you think that they are selfish, or downloading costs to everyone else. Most are struggling to survive and in the internet age it becomes tougher and tougher for brick and mortar places to do so. Save you sanctimony, you don't have a hot clue about what you are talking about. I had a ton of employees making minimum wage, and most of them would have worked for nothing if I let them. In the hospitality industry it's all about the tips and on a slow day that minimum wage worker is making 30-40 bucks an hour. The problem with min wage legislation is that if I had to pay those same employees 20 bucks an hour they wouldn't have gotten their hours. I couldn't afford it. The business taxes in Manitoba, particularly the city of W, are much higher than other jurisdictions. Cost of goods, are slightly above average, and maintenance fees on property are very high due to our climate. Speaking as a hotelier, the red tape and regulation in this province is draconian. Our liquor laws are some of the most antiquated in North America. It's not just one thing, but many things and they add up to very narrow margins. Couple that with the war the NDP wages on the industry to try and force unionization, and you've got a hospitality industry that would simply have to fold it's tent with much more prohibitive taxation, or government policy that increases cost. I speak from REAL world experience, a lifetime of it. Not imagined, or think tank hypothetical bull ****.
  12. A lifetime of being a successful businessman, I lived and died by the bottom line. You can stuff your academic papers. Academia will tell you a crap load of things that in theory should work, but don't in the real world. Could the market sort itself out....sure it could, but not without significant casualties and upheaval along the way. Look, I'm not against anyone getting a living wage but I am very much against knee jerk idiotic moves that chase business away and shut businesses down and if you don't think wage cost plays a significant factor in that than there is zero point continuing this discussion with you.
  13. As a small business owner in this province, I can assure you that a big part of wages being low in our province is a higher cost of doing business here. For small businesses, in particular, margins are tight as they are. If you increase the minimum wage too quickly you will drive a spike through the heart of small business in every sector with retail being the most vulnerable. Ultimately, any big increase in wages will get passed on to the consumers by the corporations that can survive such a thing making it an almost net zero gain for the employees receiving them. Yes, life has become unaffordable for many on the low end of the wage spectrum, and single income families. This is not new, and it is not something that 2 bucks an hour is going to fix. Getting some responsible government during an inflationary crisis might help but that's not what this particular forum wants to hear. Bumping minimum wage is fool's gold. The answer is to provide more industry and better paying job opportunities and that comes from having the ability to attract these opps to our province by not having draconian socialist government policy and taxation. You can't tax yourself out of poverty, and you most certainly can't fix it by trying to offload fundamental flaws onto the business sector.
  14. Totally agree. Just pointing out that when she took over it was to a collective groan. Kenney was immensely popular in the polls when he became leader of the UCP....and then he just plummeted. It takes a special kind of bad to have Alberta hating a right of centre premier.
  15. Pallister's popularity was plummeting though, as was his party's. Never reached rock bottom at 33%. Stefanson did little to help herself for sure, but unlike Kenney she never took over a party with any kind of popularity to speak of. Kenney took a very popular party and tanked it. He is far more unpopular than Stefanson. Stefanson's party is more unpopular than Kenney's.
  16. Not only that but Fajardo is a master at placing the ball where he cannot be intercepted. Can't be caught by his receivers either but I try to look at the positive.
  17. In fairness, she didn't exactly come on board as premier at the party's highpoint. Kenney was very popular and tanked all on his own. Stefanson started with people POed at her party already. She shot herself in the foot a few times as well, but most of her unpopularity can be attributed to Pallister's handling of the pandemic.
  18. That's highly speculative but is definitely one possibility. If I were a betting man I would suggest he was getting beat by other players. We have a good crop of recruits and the TC reports seem to suggest some of the young guys have been standing out.
  19. There is a command centre that should easily be able to count em up at the end of the game. However, in game, I can't see how you could possibly enforce it as no one knows how many plays there will be.
  20. C'mon down to Winnipeg, where we will have an NDP government next election. I guess there is definitely some irony there. Doesn't change how the people of rural Manitoba feel about it though.
  21. Gun legislation. gun legislation. gun legislation. gun legislation. Followed by carbon tax. Did I mention gun legislation yet? I am not going to get into a debate about the pros and cons of the government legislation, just throwing it out there that rural people look at gun control a LOT differently than urban people.
  22. Sad but true. You will find this exact same conversation in pretty much every rural community East of Toronto. Trudeau's policies are not popular in rural Canada.
  23. We moved out of grain in the mid 70's because there was no money in it, so I will have to take your word for it on the CWB after that time. The cost of hauling grain to market all depends how much further you have to go. In some areas it was minimal, but others it was quite expensive because the distance was further. My brother now has to haul almost 100k to sell his grain. My brother was the eldest and took over the farm. Our farm wasn't big enough to support multiple families so I went my own way. I think I made the right decision. To answer your question though, I loved cattle farming and hated grain farming. My brother operates a few head of cattle for me that I butcher and sell at auction each year, in exchange I look after the livestock for him a couple weeks each winter while he goes South somewhere.
  24. Same in the area of Interlake my Dad farmed and my brother took over.
×
×
  • Create New...