Booch

pretty sure he knows now that if he wants to be on an active roster he doesn't really hold any negotiating power...it's come down to take it or leave it for best deal he's gonna receive

always thought he would be a better back-up option than Glenn...so now here's our chance...If he had to start a few games he would give us a chance to win...and last year fiasco in Mtl was a team effort in futility...almost looked at times guys on offence couldn't give a eff

28 for a rb..should be right in his prime...plus low mileage on him...he prob 2 good years as a feature guy in him easily

he should balk...he not gonna get it either way....so cut ties and work out something with a different team

nothing wrong with competition in camp

so now experts...who is our veteran back-up option

With Walker..Bowman..Reilly..Gable.. (guys who are already signed) you have a lot of cash locked up. Reilly signed a 3 year deal in 2016 paying him 400k...years 2 and 3 bump him over 500k per year So 500 for Reilly..250ish for Bowman..200 for Walker and prob 80-90 if not more for Gable you have over 1 million tied up in 4 guys alone...not leaving a lot of flexibilty...I sure Grymes signed for decent money too. Thats some pretty scary SMS issues there if you ask me.

thers a good chance he was told that he is back in TC...would have no issue with that...he has some potential

What do you mean by that? He hasn't and can't sign there at moment

I still just not sure why he would be so agreeable to renegotiate when he wouldn't before. If Rider's didn't like his stance or demands, they would have to let him go..freeing him to negotiate wherever for the best deal he could get, and am sure Montreal would match beat whatever the Rider's offered. They gave up the first pick in the second round and I believe they have minimal picks this year...so would be a real dumb move if they lost him. I cant see him accepting anything less than 375 as a base with some easy to hit bonuses to get closer to 450...coupled with I am sure a significant raise for Bridge it be a safe bet they are going to be in the 500k range this year for their top 2 QB's and the end of their cheaping out at that position

easy to say when u got trade there and have nowhere else other than montreal either

I think both....and was schemed as such to try and cover up his shortcomings in the flats in coverage and and tracking/flowing to the ball...i guess they figured if he could plug a hole and stop the run at the line we could use others elsewhere to manage other areas...but he generally just got lost in the wash along the line and was inneffective. I also think thats why you always seemed to see guys free in the flats, and over the middle for easy completions because we had nobody there, and Loffler was used to clean it up, but also had to play back a bit to respect the deep routes and offer over the top help...such a flawed scheme

Yea to have a Ty Jones type again would be something...Brash and mean on the field..relentlessness on every play...just made all around him better. He was actually a guy that players truly feared on the field...and he was a even better guy off it! So many goodtimes we had at Strawberries back in the day...if many of you recall that place

Leggett hasn't been sketchy games wise...played in 16 games..17 games..17 games and 13 games last year. Can't ask for much more than that playing the position he does which is one of the more physical ones on defense where you are involved in a lot of contact. Also I think for most of the signings so far the majority of the increases went toward the 2017 SMS...so most likely there will be a fair amount left over for free-agency. Also salaries from perhaps JFG..Hurl..Thomas..Bond will be off the books moving forward and the amounts above minimum can be relocated elsewhere

Actually if anything a good depth signing...and we generally use an extra import on the roster to sub in and on teams and he could fit that role very well, if he doesn't "earn" a starting spot...also we don't know if Legget will be available to start the season but my gut says he will be. We also did...and may migrate to a lot more 3-4 sets with a change in philosophy and he would slot in nicely there too...none the less he is great on teams...a leader...can long snap and leads by example too...

Probably the most difficult position on the defence..especially for Americans coming up is the halfback pisition. That's a non existent position coming from American ball and the extra man..motion..looks and coverage/run support responsibilities are all new basically...and when you find good halfbacks who can absorb this and function well you do your best to keep them

I'm fine with this actually..and agree a lot of the yards that piled up was due to lack of execution. Watching a lot of the games over and and noticed significant number of plays where if Hurl had more athletism and for lack of better term talent that many a play would have been stuffed for no gain or minimal and a lot of time it was on 2nd down and would have got us ball back and limited clock eating drives. Same with Thomas..sure he made some nice plays but too many times he got washed away or nullified..especially when he was getting more reps in a game and that was a lack of execution issue due to ratio/depth...especially after Westerman got hurt. Fogg and Walker too..inexperience caused a lot of execution issues that if they did things right..wwould have been a positive defensive play. As for scape goats..noone is really saying the coaches not being brought back are being used as that.. but perhaps Missick wasn't getting things across good enough to have our guys positioned better or coached up better...we don't know the inner workings of things and can only speculate...same with Howard but again who knows. I do know though that once we altered ratio and went basically with 4 imports on d-line and rotated the ends inside and out..dropping into flats etc and bringing Knox off the edge as a rusher (which he did very well and was very disruptive..watch film and see) we had arguably one of the best fronts for the last 4-5 games of season...and that can be attributed to Hall I can guarantee that..so he can change his philosophy and mindset...and given a true MLB and continued work upfront.. and some Oshea input/tweaks I see good things happening.. .and if they stink the joint well..Hall can be scapegoated then. The real wild card is Younger...I LOVE this signing.. he is a great coach and you will see it reflected in our DB play this year. People I have talked to say he is a great mind and has a real progressive vision and coaching philosophy...he is a real good candidate to become the next Orlondo Stienhauer..just u watch

Not really...don't see all the hype. their corp was ranked 10,11,12 and 29th in the league and thats with one guy (Grant) with an aberration of a year and 2 of their top guys playing 18 and 17 games so games lost from injury can't be factored in. Sure they used Carter as a DB which was stupid and he lost reps but still if he played wouldn't have cracked the top 5 in the league. This as well for the majority of the season they having/using no run game whatsoever and were very pass happy so you'd think they would have multiple guys in the top 10 if they were so elite and great. Heck Hamilton had 2 in the top 6 and 3 in the top 14...should they not be more elite??? Stats don't tell the whole story of a player or team and their worth but I don't see what the tire pumping is for. Assumptions can be made as well for concussions as once you have received several in a short time period (as Roosevelt had last year) you become more prone to it and you can be assured guys are going to do their best to lay good licks on him all year...not head shots per say...but good thumps none the less. As for Canadian recievers what do they have worthy of spit there really??...Bagg is on the descent to see ya later town..Doubt Demski is back there, but even if he is has really proven nothing as of yet other than a decent start to 2017. I actually really like Marshall and he brings a lot but I'm sure he will get screwed out of a spot there for Thigpen and Richardson...if he comes back which i have my doubts but none the less nothing that screams elite and proven Their o-line as it is if all come back (Campbell/labatte/clarke/dyakowski/coleman) Dennis if he is back is probably in the bottom 3 in the league and not trending upward.

I think you will see more of the same with Collaros in Sask. Over on Ridefans they are all excited to see him perform behind their O-LINE...not sure what they are smoking but that is a bottom tier O-line..Clark and Dyakowski are weak and regressing...and I'd say Labatte is now too..there right tackle is probably the 7th ..maybe 6th best in the league and Dennis is going to have to take a paycut..or he will be gone as he isn't worth the cap hit. The Left Tackle Campbell is a good one, but I bet he bolts out east. He will be running and ducking for his life again, and we all seen how putrid he is when he cant sit in the pocket. plus he is going to take a n=big chunk out of their salary cap even if he renegotiates and I sure Bridge signed for significant more than he was getting last year, so they are going to have to subtract skill elsewhere. Their receiver core isn't that great either..Roosevelt is good, but he could be one good smack away from concussion issues again..Grant had an aberration of a year and highly doubt does it again..and the rest of the supporting cast is nothing better than anywhere else really....most likely they loose Demski too...so their Canadian receivers are weak as well. Don't see any big offensive numbers coming from there...a lot of what they did last year was smoke and mirrors and one lucky hot spurt where 2 teams took em too lightly

IT'S TOUGH....Especially if they don't change teams/environments...will see with Collaros as he has it now....that or he's became gunshy/timid.. We used to exploit certain QB's by just yelling when getting close...or seeming like we were close...they'd do the Kevi Glenn turtle or just duck and chuck out of bounds or into covergae

Maybe this will put their Franklin pipe dreams to bed...finally If I was Collaros too I wouldn't renegotiate....take his bonus due in the winter and if Sask doesn't like it and won't take on the contract then they pay, or let him go...and most likely goes to Montreal with a nice bonus alresdy in his pocket, so his salary elsewhere could be reduced....thats my new years wish lol

Be the dumbest off season move to let him walk or not sign him..injury or no injury. Like i said before, Achilles rehab depending on injury (tear/rupture/spagehetti tear) a guy now can be back to resuming full activity in 6-8 months

Issues at the best stadium in North America? Lies I say..lol Sweet issues..waterline leaks..AC issues...cheap seats...safety issues from roof design and danger to fans I thought this was the crown jewel of the cfl. I wonder what the next wart will be?

But he prob had a lot to cut into..i sure he made a nice penny in Green Bay too and looking at him pretty sure he didn't fritter his money on boats and hoes.

A good majority of it is tenancies, and history and perceived strengths. Wbbfan hit the nail on the head on most of it. We used to condition a QB to never pat the ball because as odd as it seems defenses's look to that and 99.9 percent of time when a QB is doing that he is going deep and guys can pull off coverage and converge on the deep ball. You will probably have noticed most of Jenning's deep ball picks occurred with 2 or 3 guys in close proximity to the ball, and that wasn't by design in coverage, that was smart coaching and film work and the DB's identifying and executing...same is going to happen to Bridge this year..just watch. Also QB tendency as to where he he will go or what he will do when flushed out of pocket and rolling out/scrambling away from pressure. Most guys will have a pretty much determined trait of what they will do, and once there is film and game history, guys will jump it often resulting in the pick, or a busted up play. Players also look for cues..physical, body language, eyes...as to what's going on and what may happen. Players don't realize they are doing certain things and it allows the defense to key on it. We used to play a QB who everytime he was going deep pretty much ran to the center to get the snap and every time he did that it was a deep shot down the rail or a corner route...not sure if he was excited or overly eager to get the play rolling but it happened everytime. Same with mouth-guards....had a receiver who chewed on his or left it dangling out of his mouth on plays where he wasn't getting ball, but on plays where he was the intended target came to line with it in his mouth .