Booch

he got traded there...so he has to grin and bear it

well based on pretty much all defensive stats..Richie Hall's defense is better than Jones defense...so being saddled with him would probably have you in a better spot as Oshea would have created the culture a team wants...heck even your own green pompom waving homer Penison has said on record that word around the league is that Winnipeg is the destination players want to be going to..based on how the team treats players, and how much players enjoy playing here..and for each other...for him to say that must of hurt like hell and be so glaringly true...he couldn't spin his usual pro Rider B.S and claim that Riderville was the destination of choice....and based on how veterans have been treated there the last 2 years...good luck on signing any good "quality character" guys

that again in itself...Rider fans are the sole proprietors of this notion that they are the crown jewel of the league and that teams/players/management/fans envy them...which is just blatantly false...as someone with connections to...and in the league...I can honestly say that is untrue...and in a lot of instances players don't really want to go there because Regina is the least desirable city in the league to play in...

which really doesn't mean anything i this argument, or discussion...it's more so how the team and the organization has progressed as a whole under each's direction..and the culture and atmosphere being developed...and you have to have a head buried way deep in the sand and be oblivious to common sense and league wide perception as to which organization is in a better spot..and looked at with more envy

and 8 TD's....720 yards rushing and close to 300 receiving...and is the engine of the offence...Lankford is maybe a Washer Fluid container at this point..there if you need it but you can do without

Harris also handles the ball 15 to 20 times a game..not quite the same scenario...and is also a proven reliable performer

His salary counts..thus the confusion now and Jones going back on his word. Once grieved and determined in wrong basically he was effectively counted against SMS...so when he was healthy he had Riders hand forced and they had to bring him back basically..prob reason why too he was never picked up by anyone I would love to know the figure in money tossed out the window on bonuses paid to Bond..Messam..Carter and salary up to point they were cut..as well as Baggs bonus and salary as I think bagg got a 30k ish bonus too...I bet its upwards of 300k..totally wasted...its almost beyond funny what a mess Jones has architected

nice...really liked him and he is another special teams demon

I think too...the Toronto game...clearly could have reversed the pick 6 as ball wasn't touched so pass interference should have been called...If trestman would have used his challenge..you wouldn't have scored that TD...and most likely T.O scores more points ...I really think you guys are lucky to be 3-4...if thats even lucky

I gotta give you credit my man...as a brainwashed Rider fan...you are at the least tolerable and can give and take constructive criticism unlike many on the Rider site when someone has differing opinion or says something anti-rider...so good on you man!

I doubt it...he's not the savior there...

yeah...because your qb has to chuck it right away...hence that silly screen..flat pass offence...They cant hold the ball for more than a second or else...also any one with any football IQ will know sacks are not a result of poor line play 80 percent of the time...I thought you were a little bit smarter in the Football IQ department...also..majority of the sacks were on a raw rookie who held on ball too long...I think over the last 5 games we have given up...3...at most...and all media...and coaching staffs in league claim bombers having the best line...Sask isn't ever in that discussion....and u have to admit...your line sucks bad...and will look silly on weekend with a raw rookie at tackle against CGY

That could be something in a dictionary...or marketed...be a nice T-shirt for LDC and Banjo Bowl

aren't you second..or third in cfl in rushing..hardly a pass first offence...It;s just that your qb's are not that good and supporting staff the same. Short dumps and hooks and screens are the easiest...or should be the easiest play to execute...so that statement makes not a lot of sense...

Like the insistence of running out Hurl..Kuale..Carmicheal..Willy...sometimes heart and feelings get in the way of whats best..

his fumble took sure points off the board..fg at worst...and could have changed the complexion of the game...one game of stats means jack crap...Thigpen had a 80 yard scamper in one game..his sole run...so I guess he is the ultra supreme RB with that wicked average...no?

Pretty much all QB's have flaws...but when you look on Nichols since he took over as a starter...he is what...29-12?...and thats playing in front of some porous defenses whee he had to consistently put up 30+ points just to get that win...so I'd say over the last 3 years he is a proven winner at this point now...not flashy and all bang...but just wins IF a Rider fan can't admit that they would be happy if they had him running the show the last few years..well then they have no real football I.Q..even behind the cheese cloth O-line you run out there game to game his quick reads and ability to make a play quickly he would do pretty good...though probably get pummeled to a pulp in doing so

Not sure...with our raw as can be raw rooikie in he produced more touchdowns in his time playing ..3 starts plus some short yardage...than the whole lot of Rider QB's all year...so at the lest I would have to say we are better off than the Riders with their 4 year guy in Bridge and their what..7 year guy in Collaros...or is it that the Bombers are just a better team all around and the QB is just a piece of the overall team being better....hmmm...u decide

Yup...lol

Yeah still not certain what he implies with that?

Yeah he doesnt fumble in season opener.. we likely won..he also fumbled 2 last year I believe as well..not to mention the drops and balls he gave up on..one of which resulted in a pick

I don't include them in the grouping of other teams in the league because based on how they do things, and treat/use players...they don't really make any sense..so inclusion is just not warranted

EXACTLY....You can send anyone deep...but if there is no real threat to make consistant plays...whats the point...all you do is draw away the db, and really....every play a db is responsible for something...I just think it's a waste and we could do a lot more with a real threat out there....and don't even go there about his return skills...we have been fine without them, and truthfully he isn't that good at kick-offs..if there isn't a clear seem or hole...he doesn't have the ability to make something out of nothing...and I question his ball security..any time he is in traffic i cringe. This was the opportunity to get someone else in the line-up who we don't really know what they have to offer and if they are in the plans for the future...and we are missing the opportunity...we know what Lankford brings...and I would be hard pressed to see a line-up in the league where he would crack the active 46..and that says a lot right there

YEAH HE IS...AND IS 4-1 as a starter this year even though he has played below his usual standards...point being???...I can say too..we are probably better off with Strevler behind center if Nichols gets hurt than anything you guys trot out there...especially based on the support all around )coaching/rb/O-line/receiver) and proof is in the pudding from whats transpired this year so far. Heck...Streveler has produce more TD's this year in his 3 starts and spot play all by himself than your offense has in total all year...can't deny that can you?

thing is....we can send any receiver deep....it's just not s skill set exclusive to Lankford..I wish people would get off of this idea that we need a specific "guy" who can stretch a defense. If you send any one deep on a post..corner..fade..whatever...a team will have a guy in coverage on him every time. And at this level (pro) Lankford isn't some amazing speed talent where nobody can/will cover him. The thing thats negative in my opinion..and experience playing is that 9 times outta 10 Lankford going deep will not require...or have a team game plan to have over the top safety help on him and can focus it elsewhere as he is not a proven guy to make the tough catches...contested catches or win many 50/50 battles...whereas a Washington...Tompkins...even Simonese could/would I know that at times we would tell a corner that this "field stretcher" is all yours and leave him at that until he shows he is getting beat, or if the free safety has read the play correctly and jumped the play as it was the first read and play went there...I think it's a waste of a chance to roster someone else and give our offence a diffident dynamic for teams to worry about as the season progresses...