Booch

regina had Mcdonalds then?...I know high speed internet is relatively new

your funny...you brought it up on who has beat who in the west...truth stings eh....ouch

and 2 less wins...so what you have games in hand...you still need to win them for that to matter

iF not for Johnny Sears brain fart...T.O most likely wins that game..that was in no way shape or form domination of any kind

who have riders beaten in the west in general lately...last 3 years let alone the road?

Yeah I guessover the last 2 seasons, ...18-9 record is all a result of lucky bounces and getting breaks...cmon man...thats laughable

But we are talking about the modern CFL here...which attendance wise just reflects this and last year ...haha

Not to mention in Wpg the city has it's own Junior B teir 2 hockey league within the city itself. As well as the MJHL similar to the SJHL but Winnipeg has several teams in that loop whereas I do not believe Regina has a SJHL team.

Well take away the 2 games and we are 5-2..Sask 3-4. We won the head to head, but wasn't because of the missed field goal...the miss played a part in it, but that comes down to Wpg having a better FG kicker then..no?...sign of a better team. Factor in our first game of the year, after a week off...we should have lost..but didn't Montreal actually other than the T.O blowout have played tough games...heck beat CGY as well so they aren't really a free spot on the bingo card. Wpg didn't really get stomped by the Stamps either...leading at halftime, a stupid goal line penalty and a pick 6 combined with Nicholls worst game in Wpg doesn't really add up to a stomping.

Yeah we were on a streak. And the Regina Pat's are not the number 1 rated team in Canada in Junior Hockey...not sure where you pulled that number from. Brier?..yea a one time a year event...hardly sucks up consumer dollars and the curling crowd is pretty limited and and a select group. As much as you hate to admit it...the Riders are pretty much all Sask has to follow sports wise at a professional type level, hence a solid support from the population...And I would hope so.

who said anything about the ARGOS? Their attendance has been an issue since the 2000's and everyone knows that..tho they have never needed a telethon or sell fake stocks

You played well in all 3 phases sure...but do you really think BC didn't drop a deuce?..after totally dominating you the week previous? The 2 line-up changes you made that game weren't the difference...Most experts too said the same, and Wally prior to the game even basically predicted it. We shall see over next 3-4 games what kind of team shows up each game...The one that beat BC..Or the one that showed up the first 6 games...I do hope tho you win tonight truth be told...not betting on it tho

pretty much is when comparing stats and numbers...you have to use the whole sum of stats for the true picture..not just pieces here and there.

Define the modern CFL...2016 AND ONWARD??? I guess in the modern CFL that team has been the biggest circus and joke and perenial basement dweller as well with no real relief in sight. Had a fluky win against BC that has the hopes all in a tizzy, and tonight it will be more of the same from the "faithful"...fire Jones...So and So sucks...what the heck...blah blah blah

you can't just cherry pick your best years and use it as a fact...take your 10 best...10 worst and average it out then...and you can't state that you drive attendance in all cities...thats just really reaching..only people who claim that..are Rider fans

Totally agree...still a work in progress, but weaker teams and ones without the winning mentality would lose those games...if you look at it...especially this year most games won by teams this year are of the close variety..look at Edm...Calgary wins...save for a few abberations this year with blow-outs games are pretty much in doubt right through to the final last half of the 4th

Found a tasty morsel for you to try and digest...make sure that your facts are correct prior to boasting Saskatchewan Average Attendance: 1970 16,743 1980 24,582 1990 26,318 2000 24,715 2010 30,1481971 17,203 1981 27,828 1991 22,597 2001 22,097 2011 29,9401972 17,875 1982 28,103 1992 21,704 2002 24,226 2012 32,3511973 20,176 1983 26,174 1993 23,851 2003 29,352 2013 37,5031974 19,028 1984 24,661 1994 24,455 2004 24,783 2014 30,0711975 19,979 1985 23,117 1995 28,500 2005 25,454 2015 31,5171976 21,665 1986 19,166 1996 22,376 2006 25,293 1977 21,160 1987 24,033 1997 27,038 2007 28,054 1978 20,337 1988 25,450 1998 24,141 2008 29,996 1979 21,186 1989 24,176 1999 19,327 2009 30,606 Winnipeg Average Attendance:1970 17,183 1980 25,040 1990 26,704 2000 25,461 2010 26,0741971 21,383 1981 27,300 1991 27,757 2001 28,144 2011 29,5561972 24,664 1982 28,596 1992 26,083 2002 27,560 2012 27,9811973 23,870 1983 24,614 1993 25,101 2003 27,225 2013 30,6401974 22,494 1984 28,321 1994 23,606 2004 24,496 2014 28,3141975 24,006 1985 28,739 1995 22,888 2005 24,317 2015 26,7461976 23,221 1986 26,873 1996 25,799 2006 26,988 1977 24,699 1987 26,841 1997 21,483 2007 27,701 1978 26,914 1988 24,858 1998 22,683 2008 27,191 1979 24,487 1989 24,160 1999 21,807 2009 25,720I.m thinking your logic is flawed and wrong..History shows that Sask doesn't always outdraw everyone....historically don't even outdraw Winnipeg....until just this last decade and part of that average is flawed due to the one year hosting a grey cup and they had huge numbers just to secure grey cup seats. In the 80's decade we averaged 26534 to Sask 24 729...stats show we drew moreIn the 90's decade we averaged 24 391 to Sask 24 030...stats show we drew moreIn the 2000's decade we averaged 26 480 to Sask 26 457..stats show we drew moreIn the 2010 and up to 2014 we averaged 28 218 to Sask 31 921 (not a true average for reason stated above)

Hmmm...save the team telethons multiple times, selling bogus Rider Stocks to have team equity to stay afloat seems to say different. YOu don't league the league in average attendance...go re-check that, and a similar thread where I compared the average of just Winnipeg and sask over the course of 3 decades and Sask only beat Winnipeg recently, mainly due to the circus that went on here. And you can't say on the road either...but like other poster has said...people get the heck out of town as fast as they can from sask so yeah...they will have some fans in other cities...and kudos to them for that...

Yeah...I did hear that the League was considering calling it the SFL and renaming the cup the Silver Silo , but thought better of it because it when confuse them and they would wander around aimlessly in Sask thinking that the CFL was gone

pfft..yeah Sask is the life blood...get over yourselves...your losing continues and you'll have many empty seats....you have proven that time and time again over the years...and pretty sad too when the Riders are the only ticket in town and nothing else to put entertainment $$ into

Yeah, kind of a dud game by Bombers, but we won..sign of a good team. Lapo kind of confuses me tho...needs to stick with whats working and there was a stretch in 3rd and 4th quarter where we went totally away from Flanders and Harris on the field together, and with our O-line and backs we should be pounding it once at the 10 and closer instead of trying the passes.. But 7-2 with some warts along the way is pretty darn good...if we have a losing record going forward which I doubt and have a 3-6 record we still end up with a 10-7 season...I truly thin k tho that 13-5 is a probability and wouldn't think 14-4 is out of the question

Yeah I hope that was just a one off with Poop sitting. I think swapping him with Lankford for a game or two would be better option. Flanders, Thorpe and fogg can give us the same thing he is on teams. His returns seem tentative last 4 or 5 games..doesn't hit it like he should..not sure if the fumble got in his head or he really got popped on a return but he doesn't seem to want to hit the holes or burst upfield like a dangerous returner should

that was just a speculation....not confirmed...I think it will be Santos-Knox

If there is a statement game to be made this year...I believe this has to be it....We roll in...dominate with a convincing win...and Bombers definitely have to be in the consideration for top 1 or 2 teams in the league...a win show's we are at that level and finally have reached where we need to be save for play-off success, and I believe that will come as well. Lose....and it show's we are close, but still a work in progress as season continues

I don't think so really, as Oshea says and I agree, Jones could easily step in and start at either wide side corner or safety, and I'm sure a rotation of Westerman, Corney, Thomas on the d-line would keep us just as we are and producing just fine. As it stands now at times we have 4, sometimes 5 nationals in on plays in defense anyway, so basically we would just switch who technically is the actual starter on the game day depth chart, but in actuality just continue to rotate and roll our guys as usual.