BomberfanMKS

IMO - our first pick will be a DB. We've gone CND at safety and that's probably the spot where we could use an upgrade the most... linebackers are fairly set as IMP and on the DL we've already drafted our Thomas replacement/backup for Kongbo. Fairly obvious we don't need to spend an early pick on OL for the next draft given our current situation (maybe a later round pick on someone who needs training but has the right body). Receiver could be an option for an early CND pick depending on how much they like Demski/Petermann, RB I think we're set with Oliviera/Augustine/Harris.

Teams have completely given up the run against us fairly consistently... it's hard for the MLB to get tackles when teams completely abandon the attack vector which will net him tackles

MBT has been scoring... and they basically never run it into the end zone

Yeh that was designed for essentially a no-look/no-read from Strev out to his receiver. The problem was on Demski not engaging the dB (whom he was supposed to block) to ensure no INT. You could argue that Strev should have recognized that Demski was standing all alone as he turned and realized that meant he needed to look for the missing DB before throwing the ball (based on the play design)... Potentially that play isn't an INT in Winnipeg with less crowd noise with the offense on the field (if Demski could have yelled at Strev not to throw the ball - I'd assume that on plays like that the receivers should have a simple word to yell at Strev to indicate the play is broken)

But our passing yards/game are so low... how can we possibly win games with such a poor passing attack?!

the guy is built like a full back and runs into contact like one.... except he's probably getting 1/2 as much contact as a typical full back. He can have a long career playing this way... look at Harris and the amount of contract he takes... more than Strev for sure but he keeps on going.

the after game interview with Streveler on 680 was telling... Strevs talked like he sucked and got carried by the team... kicking himself for missing the deep shots to Woli... I think that kind of attitude makes for a guy who is only going to get better

Streveler with only 186 yards passing... what a bum

can't be seen by cameras on game day

the second int was solidly demskis fault if anything it was demski who cost us that game offensively

i like on the 5... with the sack pressure we're getting

slant?????

bonus having cs as our holder

he's playing well... that pick was on Demski or Lapo... outside of the pic he's been hot

yeh it's a timing play by lapo... receivers have to make sure cs doesn't throw a pic

Mr Floaty gets punished

yeah based on the play call he's gotta know that anyone who gets between him and CS is getting a pick... tackle him before the pass comes out

Woli

nicely done to get those 3 pts at half

If Watson wasn't getting constantly injured back when he was with us there is a good chance he'd still be a bomber

Nah man... 52 years old and you get the wiry looking muscles that look really ripply

Lance Armstrong was doing **** that the testing people didn't even know was being done... he wasn't shooting up 20 year old steroids that every test on the block can detect for years and just not get caught.

Unless he has proof that the supplement was tainted (I.E. he still has some that he hasn't taken and can get it tested) naming what he took is basically inviting a lawsuit from the manufacturer of the supplement. You don't go making highly public, negative statements about a commercial product without proof that your statements are factual.

To be fair - the first INT was largely on him getting hit as he delivered (meant the pass was underthrown).... he should have had the time to deliver that ball given his protection. The second INT was definitely on Reilly, but it wasn't one of those really bad ones either... it was just barely thrown too far inside (and IMO if the receiver could have taken steps back towards the ball to make the INT impossible/catch easier)

Here is the thing - O'Shea is parroting this line about trace amounts 10 days after a clean test means it was unintentional. Does anything we've seen from O'Shea as our head coach over the last couple years give you the impression he would protect someone he thought was intentionally cheating? IMO - If O'Shea thought Harris was purposefully taking banned substances the BEST the club could get him to say to protect Harris would be "I won't comment". He wouldn't be talking about having Harris at practices surrounded by his teammates, because (IMO) he'd be advocating for cutting the guy.