WildPath

My family also had the same experience with trees in a pasture - trees would eventually be destroyed by cows rubbing. Cows would also usually stay in the same place since that is where the shade was. I haven't done any cattle myself, but I'm guessing it would ideally be done with rotational grazing. Trees would be given time to establish/recover rather than continual exposure to the animals. I would also imagine poplar as not a preferred species. Poplars aren't all that useful for many things, even as fuel wood. Great for quick establishment, but the bark slips easily and would be likely to peel with rubbing. Perhaps something with really strong bark like oak or elm would last longer? Or better yet, a tree that could produce food for either humans or for cattle to naturally graze?

I've heard they are preparing for this happening more often by editing the DNA of cattle to make them more tolerant of extreme temperatures. - Gene editing cattle to cope with climate change - Alliance for Science (cornell.edu) I've also read about how cattle put on 50% more weight and are ready for the market sooner when incorporated into a style of agriculture that introduces trees (silvopasture, etc) - including trees that can have their own beneficial yields like nuts for example. This would also have an obvious benefit to having a reduced carbon intensity, more biodiversity and greater erosion. - Silvopasture (aftaweb.org) Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure which of these two solutions will be more widely practiced.

Can you imagine someone vying for leadership of our country and wanting to promote an alternative currency. I'm sure it has nothing to do with his personal holdings of crypto. Surely just a coincidence that he promotes it to his rabid fans. Wondering if he will double down and blame Trudeau for the crypto crash and tell his followers the only way their investments can be saved is if he is PM. How in the world can his followers criticize Trudeau for not understanding monetary policy now that PP has been caught with his pants down.

Our provincial government has consistently relied on comparing themselves to Alberta and to a lesser extent SK to defend against criticisms, especially in response to Covid. They are more than thankful for the low bar being set and I've heard supporters echoing basically the same thing.

Not to mention the favourite to be their next leader has never had a real job, yet is the great hero of the working class. I'll never understand how people who have nothing in common with working class people and likely have disdain for them (Trump/PP) can be seen as their champion that is fighting the elites for them....

I'm not sure what you're getting at with the withholding information comment. The vaccines we have access do have done a wonderful job protecting people from severe illness, hospitalization and death. Expanding access to a vulnerable group that hasn't had access to that before is a big deal, especially when some of the youngest still have high risks of Covid. I believe Mayo Clinic has said the youngest children have similar risks of 40-50 year old unvaccinated people. So yeah, big deal. Not sure how you don't see the significance of aerosol technology if you read the story I posted. It is cheaper to create, easier to administer, less side effects, more effective than current vaccines and has longer-lasting immunity(including against new variants) is also a big deal. Not only for those who currently have access and desire to increase their personal protection (and those in contact with them), but for many around the world who still don't have access to vaccines. The fact that the technology can be used towards issues like tuberculosis that still can be devastating in developing countries is also a massive impact. I think some of the reluctance to take a third dose is that expectations were so high about a return to normal after the 2nd dose and the reality hit hard that it wouldn't make Covid disappear. With new vaccine technology that introduces better immunity that lasts longer would likely have greater uptake. Expanded availability, more resistance to new variants and a different delivery mechanism can make people less reliant on the vaccine status of others.

It still seems a bit more gotcha politics than any substantial to me. This is coming from someone who thinks the NDP legitimately care about the high food prices much more than the CPC. I'd still like background, but I'm guessing someone said a funny boo/hiss during that portion of the charade and others laughed at it. Pretty sure CPC MPs are aware laughing openly about food prices would not go over well.

Don't tell that to people with children under 5 that have been waiting ages for a vaccine for their kids or people who are immunocompromised and are the first to get their boosters as soon as they are eligible. If both these come to fruition along with a fall booster that improves protection from Omicron - it will be massive the people who need it most and to those who care about those who need it most.

It does happen with all parties. Its just unfortunate that the party complaining about the cost of living and the need for tax cuts the loudest is also caught laughing when another party is talking about people not having enough money for food. Likely (hopefully?) unrelated to the substance of what Singh is saying - perhaps like the cameras catching a football player laughing/smiling on the sidelines while their team is getting spanked.

Where is the shocked button when I need it...

One of the things I hate most about politics is the need to constantly applaud whenever your side says something and boo and hiss whenever another side says something. I was absolutely disgusted when an NDP MLA was asking a question about personal care homes during a Covid wave and she was drowned out by the PCs cheering and applauding when she mentioned the health minister. I emailed a few PC MLAs to ask if they were part of the applause. I got one response and they said they would look into it and get back to me. He obviously never did respond. Political theatre is so annoying and sometimes goes overboard. Our political system would be so much better for citizens if there was more reaching across the lines and actual consideration for what policies would do best for the people. Way too much tribalism from all sides.

Other good vaccine news: Kids Vax - It may have already been posted, but it looks like the dose for the youngest ones should be here soon (YAY!). I read on another site that it was a different formulation than the vaccine they've been using up till now, but I haven't seen that confirmed. The other story also said it may begin being rolled out in June in the US. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Elicits Strong Immune Response in Kids Under 5 After Third Dose (hematologyadvisor.com) Inhaled Vax - An aerosol vaccine is in early stages of development. Likely to be cheaper, better against variants (even ones not mutated yet) due to targeting more proteins than just the spike protein and also have less side effects. Beyond that, the technology could be used for other viruses. - The pandemic accelerated decades of research, leading to inhaled vaccine candidate for COVID-19 (medicalxpress.com) Sounds like the inhaled vax could be a real game changer. Apparently they have been working on the tech for a while and Covid put more resources and urgency into developing it.

The rhetoric from the MPs supporting PP that he is some great uniter of the CPC or even all of Canada 😄 I'm sure there's some positive ways to describe him, but you absolutely can't paint him as a someone that unites people.

This was my thoughts with the obnoxious anti-vax/mask protests. Why are there so many people loudly willing to self-identify as idiots? Answer - there are people that have realized they can make personal gains(money/power/fame) by emboldening these people and their ignorant views (Trump/PP/Levant/Bernier) The dumbest of the dumb are now a known commodity. And to think these are often the same people who tag people who disagree with them as sheep...

They have been provided with an excuse to raise profits and have a ton of backing to increase profits more by eliminating taxes on their products in addition to benefitting from massive subsidies. O&G companies are raising dividends on stock as they see massive profits continuing into the future despite talks of phasing out O&G.

He's also Minister of Natural Resources and Northern Development and the province has said the mining sector is open for business. I'd honestly be more shocked if his new job is not from connections made through politics. And then its just a matter of connecting the dots and seeing how the corporation has benefitted from this government in the past. I have worked some jobs when I sign a term contract. If I ever decided to leave before my contract was up, I would likely be blacklisted or at the very least that would be a big stain on my resume. It seems odd to me when politicians were elected to serve a term and then just leave, especially if their party is in power.

That's true. There is personal accountability, but governments also have a responsibility to enact regulations that shape what individuals can do and the benefits/consequences they receive from their actions. For example, a carbon tax rewards those who choose to live a less carbon-intensive lifestyle. Subsidies for oil & gas encourage development and use of fossil fuels by lowering extraction costs and consumer costs. Government policy consistently alters how individuals act within a society and therefore have considerable power to enact change. There should be tremendous pressure on governments to do something about climate change, just as there is pressure on them to prevent violent crime or maintain infrastructure. Governments, as a group, have been failing humanity in this regard.

I don't think it is stupidity, but rather complacency or indifference. Most come from ridings and surround themselves with people that will hail anyone wearing PC colours regardless of what they do. They know they have little need to be responsible to the voters and have an apathetic attitude towards regular Manitobans. With a majority, there is little that can be done to stop them, but most will still keep their job after next election because they come from places that would never vote anything except Conservative. You know, socialism, the apocalypse, stuff like that might happen if those areas didn't elect a Conservative. Would this include things they have said/done where they refused to apologize? Pallister basically defended the genocide of indigenous people saying that there were "good intentions" behind what they did and then refused to apologize about it. I can only imagine what the conversations in the party are like behind closed doors. The instances where they have apologized or should, have basically been because they forgot to filter their true beliefs when comments are for public consumption.

I don't think many critiques of her or her party are based on gender, but this party royally stinks. A lot of significant roles in the party are filled by horrid politicians. This government seems like a satire: Minister of Indigenous Reconciliation and Northern Relations immediately comes to the defense of residential schools upon his appointment. Former Health Minster Friesen attacking doctors saying they are attempting to create chaos by warning that measures should be taken to prevent waves of Covid. Former Education Minister (Goertzen) participates in webinar advocating for home school while education minister "Education isn't simply a state activity — maybe shouldn't even be primarily a state activity," Current health minister belongs to a church that has routinely publicly disobeyed public health orders, sued the government over health orders and Audrey Gordon herself was caught numerous times in violation of health orders. It almost feels like they are intentionally mocking Manitobans sometimes. At the very least don't put people in charge of the very roles they obviously are completely unsuited for. This includes the current premier who was abysmal as the health minister during the worst wave of Covid and failed her way up to leader of the province.

Even as a gun owner, I like this legislation. Not really sure why anyone would need handguns or assault-style weapons. I support shooting centres having these guns available for people to try and use in a safely, controlled environment if they would like. From what I understand, most research points to 'guns for self-defense' as unhelpful or even harmful, not to mention the likelihood of accidents happening in situations outside of self-defence. - Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault - PMC (nih.gov) Of course any opposition to this will say that they are targeting legal gun owners and doing nothing about illegal guns in Canada, but I'm not sure why both can't be done at the same time. I frequently see law enforcement taking illegal guns off the street and I haven't seen any people opposed to legislation like this propose any better ways to target illegal firearms.

I have and I do. I also have many friends who are small business owners and they agree the minimum wage should be raised. If I only relied on personal experience this would tell me all small business owners want to minimum wage to be raised. Like JCon, I'm done. It is clear that fact and legitimate research won't sway your opinion. No point in continuing.

Yes! As a business owner I'd like my customers to have more money in their pockets. If businesses are relying on employees to work below the poverty line, that indicates a problem. Trickle down economics has been thoroughly disproven and we are realizing that a race to the bottom only helps the very few at the top. Recent policy by international agreements to raise the minimum corporate income tax demonstrates this. The London School of Economics, along with a number of studies have destroyed any credibility of trickle down economics. I'd provide links, but really, it will obviously be cast aside as academic hogwash. I'm sure your personal experience is much more valid than the opinion of distinguished economists. Justinflation, right? The issue with this is not that member on this forum are biased against your opinion, the issue is that you disregard highly credible information in favour of biased sources and personal anecdotes. It is hard to persuade someone when you disregard evidence and only offer personal experience and biased sources to back up your arguments.

Could be revamping it, its not really clear. Having a position for a manager would indicate something different is in the works. Still wondering how the $500,000 has been spent and how much of that went into Obby's pockets or his campaign. Coulda, woulda, shoulda I guess. PC party is fortunately making some rumblings of increasing the minimum wage, currently scheduled to bump up to $12.35 an hour in October I believe. With Sask raising their minimum wage we will be the lowest in Canada.

So it looks like Obby Khan has shut down Good Local. Timeline - Obby considers running in provincial politics, but unsure of what party - PC party gives his business $500,000 (More than all other businesses received from the program combined) - Obby declares he will run for PC party to replace Pallister - Obby wins election - Obby shuts down Good Local Would love to know how that money was spent. There have also been reports that Obby was using Good Local staff for his campaign in Fort Whyte.

Possibly. It could also lead to the team willing to develop Canadians the most getting access to more developmental Canadians. Other Canadians that are already developed and past their rookie contracts are free to sign with another team after. I'm not a fan of the quirkiness of the new deal, but something which benefits teams that put effort into developing and playing Canadians could be good. And its likely something needed to push the deal through. Still wish there was no push to change the ratio at all and the negotiations from the start were just about finances, insurance, etc. I don't see much of a risk of tanking and fielding random CIS'ers. Not too many teams way out of playoff contention in the CFL the way we see in the NHL. And tanking for a 2nd round pick.... don't see that as likely.