HardCoreBlue

So I'm reading that Dannielle Smith/Rob Anderson have said Rachel Notley has banned certain media outlets from her scrums. If true, need to hear more on this. If they are recognized media outlets (no matter how slimy) all need access and all need to be allowed to ask follow-up questions to people vying for office.

Take back Alberta . . . Hmmmmmmm. Sounds similar to something I’ve heard.

Yup and when Matthews scores his first goal in the post season we will once again be met with Matthews can actually walk on water as well as McJesus. This talk will carry over to other games as well. For example, Winnipeg will score and at the intermission replaying the goal they will reference Matthews and McJesus talents to describe the goal scored by the Winnipeg player. The only saving grace to this is when TO gets punched out, their tears will taste delicious.

And she’s not a conservative. She is no where near the sanity of the good true conservatism platforms. Hey I like some things conservative offer in how to govern but that’s not what she represents. She’s a wingnut, articulate, but still a wingnut that has probably felt emboldened the day fucknuts came down that escalator in 2016.

Here's hoping.

Exact reason why it would be so nice to see Tampa, LA and Winnipeg head off into the second round as a big FU.

When you think about it, her handlers probably suggested muzzling the media by only allowing only one question per journalist with no follow-ups to help minimize her knuckle dragging absurdness that seeps out of her mouth. In effect, her handlers are muzzling her as the primary target with the media being secondary.

Regardless of the party they represent, I hope you all grill them with specific questions, concerns you may have as a Manitoban and where they specifically stand on them and not just what their brochure says.

Danielle Smith sets limits on media questions cause ‘it’s election time’. Knuckle draggers here and everywhere will explain this away with their usual yes buts, everyone’s bad nonsensical absurd drivel while attaching a national post link that reports DS is the best option to lead Alberta.

Prolly woke socialist Commie libtards the governmentally controlled radical left CBC interviewed. Fake news.

An sentence that caught my attention taken from a piece by Bryan Murphy Sporting News: 'There's no debate about who the Jets starter is. Like he has done all season, (and let's face it, most of his career), Connor Hellebuyck is going to be putting Winnipeg on his back, trying to nearly single-handedly get the team wins in the postseason'. Ummmmmmm sure I get the we go as Helle goes and sometimes this team fails miserably in supporting him (i.e., offensive and defensive support) but to me the bolded parts especially are a bit over the top. Last time I checked we do have other talent on the team. Don't know who Bryan Murphy is and what his background is but don't like him. 🙂

I have a new found hate for the Wild almost as much, or even more right now, than for the Leafs/Oilers. I hope they get obliterated in the first round.

Large numbers of human beings continue to die everyday in this invasion while I muse about and joke around in other threads. What a weird Fing world we live in.

These facts don't fit your narrative. Wait, what? I'm confusing myself.

For some reason every year, especially this one re Bedard, I hope a team with 1 or 2 percentage chance wins. 🙂

My normal predictable self of course: The Jets aren't going to make the playoffs, what the hell is happening to this team to meh even if they do make the playoffs it will be short lived to wow they actually made it in to lessssssssssssssss gooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

If Obby was shoved then he should file assault charges but no takes it thru the speaker. Interesting.

The saying 'history tends to repeat itself' is ringing true once again.

That's the current NHL perfectly summed up.

Here's hoping (knowing the very very limited odds of it happening)

This video should be moved to the RIP 2023 thread.

If F'ing Ehlers isn't available to go first round, my level of frustration will rise. Any scenario we can meet the the F'ing Wild if we win the first round?

Here’s hoping the Argo’s slogan for 2024 reads something like ‘2023 forgotten, 2024 will be our year’. Argos suck and occasionally blow.

These aren't your words nor your subjective interpretations. This is what they said and tried to do caught all on video. Thank goodness for stupidity, it does actually serve a needed purpose. What fascinates me is how some who claim 'moderate, centrist, lean a bit here or there, everyone's equally bad' completely glosses over serious stuff here with a yea but and than get pissy and posture themselves when called on it by saying Don't lecture me, everyone's equally bad and that's a fact, FULL STOP blah blah blah It's F'ing annoying. I'd rather engage in a discussion with someone who is upfront with who they really are than someone who bobs and weaves behind labels to remain slippery.

Help me understand why this wouldn't always be? It should be a mandatory consequence regardless of who you are and regardless of the case being investigated. If a subpoena is legally issued and I don't comply, I (regardless of who I am and where I fit along the continuum of power and status) need to feel hurt quickly and swiftly.