HardCoreBlue

What’s the downside of bringing in Strev for a couple of sets even if it doesn’t work? I love Zac always have and always will but changing the pace when things aren’t happening is okay. See how Strev can deal with the o’s injuries. If he doesn’t produce after a couple of sets put Zac back on.

THAT was a gross game. But a win is a win. We need to be comfortable in bringing in Strev to run his packages when the O is faltering.

ST’s please to end this game.

A replay would be nice TSN ffs

Going for the kill shot on the first play

Not taking it on the 40 to take time off the clock

Push off and tug. Both guilty.

Okay almost.

Not yet.

What’s the downside of bringing in Strev to run his package sets? A two and out? I would assume Strev allowed to throw?

I don’t know about coming out. Take the knee and get field position.

And they took little time to review it. Unbelievable.

Nope CC disagrees. lol

Yup not a barn burner.

I don’t understand this salary argument of keeping a player on. If that’s a reason coaches keep players on when they should come out then the coach should be shown the door. If management is pressuring coaches because of salary then they should be shown the door.

Not to mention n the energy to the O if he can bring if he strings a few 1st downs together.

Need a two and out please and thank you.

Bombers have no energy.

Trap game potentially coming to fruition. Ffs. Need someone to step up. Giving old man Levi some confidence.

Ruh roh.

I would submit that on those particular plays we are missing Prukop.

Is that the impact of being down two lineman not bringing in Strev to get the short yardage? I know we are on our own 21 but wow that’s yardage we can get usually.

Collaros can not take too many hits like that. Yuck.

Yup not a happy man. I think Lui was probably thinking I better keep my distance.

I’m hoping they are doing it to pump the tires of the CFL to help with viewership and really nothing to do with Rourke himself.