Jump to content

Fatty Liver

Members
  • Posts

    10,741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Fatty Liver

  1. I think yer supposed to wear them under your pants.
  2. As long as I don't have to fill out the damn thing again. Took forever and I didn't like some of the questions. I feel the same way about doing my tax returns.
  3. That says more about the quality of our receiving corps behind Moore than a compliment to Moore. I would say that the lack of production overall this year by the receivers is more due to the lack of a quality OC and having to use back-up QB's for most of the season. If you were to extrapolate Moore’s numbers for a full 18 games, he would have close to 1100 yards for the season. That would be good enough for 6th overall in the CFL. Moore is not worth the money he is currently getting, but to say that he is not a #1 receiver is just not accurate. Does he deserve #1 money in spite of the fact that he gets injured way too often? That’s another question all together. But I am sure that in his mind and his agents mind, the answer would be yes. Agreed, I don't see anything terribly wrong with the Bombers receivers or RB's, the problems lie elsewhere in the Bombers O.
  4. This is progress. Return of long-form census a win for science, rationality. According to The Toronto Star, Liberal party sources have confirmed that one of the first things the new Justin Trudeau-led federal government will do after being sworn in Wednesday is reinstate the mandatory long-form census. Doing so quickly would mean Statistics Canada could use the long-form questionnaire next spring as part of its 2016 census efforts, thankfully dumping the vastly inferior yet more expensive National Household Survey. The NHS, a bit of ideological idiocy that undermined fact-based decision-making in government, business, health and many other sectors, especially in smaller communities where reliable 2011 data was simply not available, was foisted on the nation by the Tories in 2011. Business leaders, health care professionals, economists, lawyers, educators, provincial and municipal government officials, along with many other groups, decried the former Conservative government’s bizarre 2010 decision to axe the long-form census. The federal auditor general noted that using the voluntary National Household Survey (NHS) in 2011 led to StatsCan being unable to provide reliable data for 25 per cent of communities across Canada. To top it off, the Conservatives, who argued they were better stewards of taxpayers’ money, spent $22 million more on distributing the NHS than it would have cost to simply keep the long-form census. But enough of reasons for why killing the long-form census was a regressive move, a decision defended only by wilfully blind, diehard Harper Conservative backers. In my experience, it’s a waste of time trying to explain to that group why, based on statistical science, voluntary surveys produce inferior, unreliable data compared to a mandatory questionnaire. (Yes, even with the inevitable small percentage of people who purposefully lie when they fill them out). Though the threat of jail time was also often held out as a terrible injustice, it never seems to matter to Harper supporters that, in fact, no one had ever been jailed for refusing to fill out the census. In any case, I imagine there were quite a few people who had voted Conservative in past elections who parted ways with Harper’s party on Oct. 19 over their anti-science, in fact at times anti-rationality, track record — and I’m talking about more than just the census. It always struck me that one of the root meanings of conservatism is being cautious about change. A small “c” conservative is someone who wants solid, rational evidence before accepting the need to disrupt a status quo that seems to work. Someone who wants to carefully weigh what could be lost before plunging ahead. There was nothing small “c” conservative about killing the long-form census. If the reports are true and the Liberals do quickly reinstate the long-form census, it’ll be a welcome signal that rational, science-based decision-making is back in favour in government circles. And, to be fair, I’ll note the NDP have also long called for the reinstatement of the mandatory extended survey. Another thing to watch for will be if, and how fast, the Liberals move on an equally important promise made during the campaign — making Statistics Canada “fully independent,” i.e., operating at arm’s length from government. Again, it should be obvious why it’s vital that the national agency gathering data on a vast range of aspects of Canada, including the economy, unemployment, health and justice conditions, is not perceived as having to “report” to, or follow the dictates of, any particular minister or government. The power of data is strongest when it’s consistent and untainted by perceptions it could be manipulated by the government of the day, regardless of the party is in power. Assuming StatsCan does become an agency of Parliament, that status should provide at least some protection against future governments monkeying around with the census again. Governments yet to be elected could try to take back that independence. But that would require legislation, a step they’d have to take in the open. They’d also have to explain why Canada’s national statistician should revert to reporting to a government minister and not the House of Commons. Paul Schneidereit is an editorial writer and columnis
  5. TO would be dumb to let both Ray and Harris make it to free-agency and it wouldn't be wise for them to choose Ray over Harris at this point. I think Ray's big contract days are over, would like to see the Bombers ink Ray as a backup QB/OC assistant and work his way up the coaching ranks like Dickenson did in CGY. Ray's experience and assistance with play-calling behind Willy's physical talent could be the ladder the Bombers need to reach the next level of competence. I would be absolutely shocked if Ray is signed as a back up anywhere aside from Toronto... I'm pretty sure Montreal would easily throw money at Ray to start for them. I don't know....maybe Ray will strengthen over the off-season and be fully recovered for next year but I wouldn't be surprised if he never regained his form and the same goes for Lulay.
  6. TO would be dumb to let both Ray and Harris make it to free-agency and it wouldn't be wise for them to choose Ray over Harris at this point. I think Ray's big contract days are over, would like to see the Bombers ink Ray as a backup QB/OC assistant and work his way up the coaching ranks like Dickenson did in CGY. Ray's experience and assistance with play-calling behind Willy's physical talent could be the ladder the Bombers need to reach the next level of competence.
  7. Unless it's a typo and Cole's name was never removed from the PR, it looks like he's back with the Bombers.
  8. Man that's a halftime show you can get reved about ... Maybe so, but the highlight of my halftime was always taking a 10 minute long piss in the old "trough of champions".
  9. List, please. Probably six from Mtl. but who else will be available?
  10. I wouldn't blame you if you've never heard of Chris Normand but he is on the Bombers roster. Pontbriand will be 33 next year, time for him to hang it up and give the new guy a shot.
  11. I was hoping for the Shriners and their little cars.
  12. I think the rules already encourage form tackling and the officials can certainly apply rough play and unnecessary roughness penalties to both high (above the shoulders) and low (knees) hits. It's a change in approach for the officials that needs to happen. The rules are there. The game is derived from rugby and if you don't form tackle in that sport it's an automatic foul. A good example was that hit on Banks yesterday where he literally was clubbed in the head. They made the right call on review, but any clubbing of the head whether or not grasping facemask should see the flags flying from any official with a view of the ballcarrier. I agree, the promotion of form tackling is necessary for the good of the game, take the notion of using excessive force and punishment right out of football before medical science does it for them. Hockey allows body-checking but they penalize any hits that are excessive with boarding or charging penalties. They need to do the same thing in football and not only for the QB but for the RB's and receivers as well. Every game there are at least a couple of missile launch "hits" were the defender leads with his helmet with the sole intention of punishing the ball-carrier. Rugby got it right from the start, a return to arm tackling is needed.
  13. Bands not a band unless they're cool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZHWy6W00oM
  14. Even two years ago Edm. swept the Bombers, so they were never quite as bad.
  15. Sorry, I'm busy that weekend. Built my house top heavy and she's beginning to list badly and might roll, had to put a line on the floor that my wife and kids are not allowed to cross. Safety first.
  16. I like this idea. Would like to see them play Marcel at QB for a Q just so he gets an idea of how much fun it is to play within his own offence.
  17. Anyone happen to have Marcel's e-mail address?
  18. I was wondering the same thing last week, this guy is virtually invisible. I wonder if he actually spends anytime in Canada. What?!? Orridge is an American who just got his Canadian citizenship. He made sure he was seen on television at one of the Liberal candidate's soiree's election night in Toronto. Interviewed on CBC that night. I know that. He's lived in Canada for around 10 years which is why I said "what?!?" to the ridiculous comment I bolder. You can't bolder me, I have bigger boulders.
  19. Yeah I have a point, Bucko. I am saying you don't have a clue what security costs, and your entire opinion is politically biased. I am basing that on all of the bullshit you've posted about Harper in the past. But really who cares. The election is over, and I would hate to sound "pissy". Well, you're wrong..again.Just a simple statement on my part about the expense of transporting the vehicles. That's it. Doesn't matter who was the PM. You just want to spin something, wrong or not. But you're still pissed that your boy lost the election and that he lost because all that "bullshit" was true. Oh well. I'm sure when the PM or President or other world leaders travel abroad they'd be able to rent or borrow armoured limos. But there is a reason they always prefer to use their own. And it's pretty obvious. Begrudging a leader his full security detail because it's not the party you support is small minded and petty. I'm sure the prince will fly coach and insist on driving his own smart car when he travels. You use the word "always" as if it is standard procedure. I challenge you to find another instance were they transported a limo for a previous PM to use in a foreign country.
  20. It sure sounds like he knows what he's talking about. Why would Walters fire him? Could have come down to money. With his team scouting approach Walters may have offered Mol a huge cut in pay compared to what he was paid under Mack when it was basically a one-man show.
  21. Good point.
  22. Except that it wasn't true, and you made a complete fool of yourself, by posting such utter bullshit. That's the point. Harper deserved to lose, and he's not "my boy". I will be just as adamant if next election, you post a bunch of total bullshit about Trudeau. Speaking of which: Here's Trudeau trick or treating yesterday with his wife and kids. I think it's pretty cool, that we have a leader who dresses up and goes out with his kids, even though this was no doubt a staged photo-op. How cool would it be to go to your door to give out candy, and there's the prime minister with this kids? Now, if I was a partisan jack-arse like you, I'd complain about how it cost the taxpayers money for him to go trick or treating, because they would have had to have an RCMP detail following, and probably clearing houses in advance to ensure that the new PM wasn't going into some sort of security risk. But I won't do that, because I think it's important that he and his kids get to live a normal life, and the parents get to enjoy their kids at this age, including participating in Halloween fun. Anything else would be un-Canadian. Looks like Mrs. Trudeau's is set to disintegrate some interloper with some kind of fancy lazer weapon. Either that or it's an equally dangerous portable glue-gun.
×
×
  • Create New...