Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Morning Big Blue

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Goalie

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Goalie

  1. Kreider made one hell of a move, BUFF did not have him defended, buff got owned really. It was a nice move and nice goal by Kreider, Blaming Pavelec on that one is just crazy and obviously from someone who has never played hockey, or if so, was a terrible teammate. Sometimes, the other guy just makes a nice move, that's what that goal by Kreider was, he beat Buff to the puck and made a nice move on the goalie, the only move he could really have made to beat him and did it in a split second really, Pav had him but, Kreider made a great move. Why always looking to blame Pavelec? Why can't it just be the ranger player made a nice move and scored?
  2. Honestly thought most questions asked including the ones by the media were ridiculous. Gbill had a good one asking if wylie would be full time and coach said he would be. That's about the most interesting thing I got from it.
  3. Never heard of it or seen it ever so one has to wonder how real it is but if real makes one question the character and integrity of a backup Canadian rb who if wasn't Canadian wouldn't be in the league
  4. Can't be more than 5 with a phone hearing
  5. Oh. Yeah. 2 or less then it is but still a dumb play by a leader
  6. In person? If so means 3 for sure maybe 5 games even. Pretty vicious and had intent for sure. Think he's done for the regular season
  7. That one at the end of the game? Doubtful. No injury and was he even assessed a double minor or major? Didn't look all that vicious tbh
  8. Jets need a legit sniper. Paging nik ehlers really
  9. Team out played the Rangers all game long. Out played Chicago too but just can't capitalize on their chances and they had tons of chances
  10. Buff gonna be suspended for his vicious cheap shot crosscheck on miller
  11. Buff gonna be suspended for his very vicious cross check on miller. Bad buff
  12. They can still win out and get 100 points and they did outplay the Rangers big time
  13. Not even close to being just about it. Will come down to last game of season probably
  14. We dominated but lost because of breakdowns and penalties
  15. Bad buff tonight that's for sure. Not a good game by 33
  16. You serious? Had no chance on all 3. Hutch plays and we lose too
  17. Then don't read it. Really that simple no? Some of you guys crap on pointless stuff
  18. They say 97 points should get you in. 6 games to get 7 points. Not must win but would be nice
  19. Henrik has struggled since being back and the last time these 2 teams played each other. Jets won 1-0 and that goal was scored in the shootout. Pav shut them out and stood on his head
  20. Lawless said it. Not Chevy
  21. Who said it would take 5 years?
  22. T bay event center apparently not going to happen
  23. We aren't re-building really, to re-build means you get rid of the older core, that's why toronto's rebuild don't start until they move on from kessel and or phaneuf even, There was no rebuild going on here, they were restocking the depth shelves but in order to rebuild, guys like Lad,Buff,Wheeler,Little, Toby,Slater,etc would all have to be long gone by now. I don't get this year 4 stuff, it's not year 4, it's year 4 of the Jets but for the most part, this core group of players outside of Scheif,Trouba,Lowry,Myers and the rentals like Stafford,Frolik even and Stempniak, have been together for 5 even 6 years now. To re-build means you have to get rid of what you had before, we didn't, we just tried to add to it and for 3 4 seasons now, they have been close but not close enough. EVENTUALLY, if this keeps going, you do have to re-build and that means building around the younger guys like the scheifs,troubas,lowrys,myers etc. You know, there are only 3 guys the Jets have drafted that are on this roster right now? Scheif,Lowry,Trouba. That's it, That's not a re-build, that's just the team had no depth when they came here and now they kind of do.
  24. Mateas didn't even compete at the combine did he? Not sure he's going 1st overall to be honest, could see a guy like Chung going first, from what i've read, he seemed to have had a very strong showing. Really, i think the draft is a crap shoot, I still kind of get the feeling that teams in the first round will take non OL guys knowing that several will still be there in round 2, obviously some teams will take OL, BC i think is a team that will take an OLINE, probably SASK too but outside of that, i could see the first round being a bunch of WR'S, LB's and DB's and then OL going in round 2. I've also seen some suggest that they think Walters will trade pick 2, or is wanting too, Reading the new blog by cameron the bomber site, i don't think that's very likely but why would you trade down? I mean, if there is a guy there at 2, Let's just say It's Demski, why not just take him? Why do you have to trade down to take him? If he is the guy you want, why not just take him at 2, Does it really matter where the guy is picked? I don't get this trading down stuff in the CFL draft, I get trading up, i don't get trading down, If there is a guy you want at 2, it's likely he's going to be there so why wouldn't you just take him and avoid the risk of someone else taking him. If he is the guy they want that is?

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.