Goalie
Members-
Posts
24,946 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Goalie
-
This is exactly what im saying. Its a red flag.. Yes we are winning and are 4 0. That's great. I just have yet to see a game where all 3 phases are going. Thats troubling. On the plus side... We are 4 and 0 and could be much better and more consistent on O.
-
Briggs = unlikely as he was in a sling on the sidelines
-
If i cant come to a fan forum to discuss aspects of the game.. Then whats the point of a fan forum? Ppl get their panties in a bunch over stating pure facts now? Im thrilled they won.. I just am not pleased with their 2nd half effort and play calling. I don't know what's so wrong about that.. Is everything rainbows and puppy dogs? Argos suck.. I would have liked to see our O put up more points. Did we have 100 yards in the 2nd half ?
-
No. Its not that at all. Its discussing an important aspect of the game.. The ability to consistently.. Ill say it again.. The ability to consistently move the ball through the air. We dont do that.
-
Nichols was good in the first half. I can admit that. Surely play calling plays a role.. Its the Lapo special.. We have all seen it over and over with a lead of 2 TDs plus.. But.. At the same time.. If you cant move the sticks through the air, which we dont really seem to be able to do consistently.. Minus Andrew Harris making 4 guys miss.. This will all catch up.. Eventually Harris wont put up 100 plus.. Then what? We cant move the ball through the air. This is what im talking about.. Its not about not liking Matt Nichols or being Anti Nichols.. Its facts. Our O is big play, Harris or 4 yard passes. Stats? Who cares but being able to get 1sts downs through the air is important in the CFL. Game managing to me means staying on the field... Killing the clock. We dont do that.
-
Why discuss aspects of a game when u can just insult people for stating facts.
-
**** you pretty much. Im talking facts. Its not my fault u can't accept it. You are on ignore now cuz for some reason talking facts with you... Yup witch hunt. 2 passes for 135.. 17 for 80 ish.. Yup.. Witch hunt.
-
No. How do u argue facts.. He did have 2 passes for 135 ish.. He did have 17 others for 80 ish. He was ok in the 1st half.. Altho 33 6 and having 10 1sts downs isn't exactly managing the game
-
IDGAF about BC or Mike Reilly.. Mike Reilly has nothing to do with Matt Nichols and PLAP. Phony narrative based on 2 plus seasons.. Yup.
-
Our QB or OC playcalling needs to improve. I will say i think Nichols Streveler whoever can only do so much when our OC decides to go ultra conservative. So i don't know how much is QB and how much is on Lapo Im guessing.. Nichols was great in 1st half so.. Tells me the 2nd half is mostly play calling
-
Its a fact. Its our O. Big play or nothing
-
Whats your ******* point.... And when Harris isnt going.. Nichols still puts up 2 big passes and a bunch for 3 yards. The real whining is ppl refusing to accept facts about our O play. Yup. Harris. Guess what tho.. There's been games where Harris has sucked also.. Nichols still puts up just over 200 yards
-
Yeah.. But this isnt just today exclusive. This is our O. Big plays or nothing.
-
Who TF said any of that... I was stating a fact... We dont move the ball through the air.. We either hit a deep ball or gain 4 yards.
-
I don't see it. He had 17 passes for a total of 80 85 yards.. That's not good.
-
He wasn't very good. 215 yards isnt good.. No matter how u slice it. It means we dont move the ball passing
-
I don't get the Nichols stuff today.. He had 2 huge passes and 17 or so totalling 80 yards.
-
1. Lucky - set the tone 2. Nelson - solid 3. Harris HH to the D for the goal line stand
-
Lost in all this.. Outside of 2 passes.. Nichols had about 70 yards passing on 16 other throws