Goalie
Members-
Posts
24,946 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Goalie
-
Ya. Raw just got a lot more interesting for sure. I personally loved the end of raw and being a long time "smart" fan... the moment hhh pedigreed reigns I knew he was gonna do the same to Rollins. I like it tho. Lots of interesting scenarios here. Owens and Hhh fan Favorites now? Could it be the start of a stable of sorts with nxt guys or hhh guys? Dunno but I liked it
-
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Well the main difference between lawless and Pederson Is lawless doesn't always try to blow smoke up people's asses where Pederson... yeah that's all he does. Lawless and I'm not the biggest fan of his ... is a respected Journalist if you will with quite a few sources around different leagues. Pederson is basically a hack blogger I guess ... lawless is bob Mckenzie and Pederson Is Eklund -
In my opinion what bomber teams of the past have or haven't done in Regina on labour day is irrelevant. Because how many guys on the current team was involved in those. Not many. Bombers are a better team with a better D and special teams. I honestly feel like the Bombers are not only gonna win this Sunday but I think that a blowout is very very very very very very very very very possible also. I think Sask has an awful D and I think putting up over 30 on teams who are better than Sask means Bombers could hit 50. Ya bold but 55 to 12 is my guess. Ass a wooping
-
Ya. He's a good ahl player. He will definitely play on the Moose. It's an ahl contract so it's his only option. It's a really nice signing actually for the moose. Cormier not getting an nhl contract is interesting. Didn't think he would. Didn't think he'd be back with the Moose tho but probably be captain.
-
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I think they are very high on Bennett but to throw a rookie pretty much in there if Nichols gets hurt is asking for problems... we are in a playoff battle right now... as much as some might not want to admit it, if Nichols got hurt, I'm sure most people here regardless, would feel a lot more Comfortable with Willy starting then Davis or Bennett at this point... and if not, well, then.... those people have an odd way of looking at things. -
Around The League Regular Season Discussion
Goalie replied to Noeller's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Well, guess, in the end... Duron Carters suspension is upheld and he will miss the als game vs Ottawa this week. Could have fooled me but i thought he didn't dress vs the Bombers.... (i know he did) but Adams pretty much shut him down completely. -
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I guess the real question is... what type of market is it? I mean, If you are going to move Willy, you'd definitely need a QB, and not some rookie coming back our way unless the Bombers feel confident Davis and Bennett can win some games if Nichols goes down... Which I'm not sure they are, Has Davis seen the field this season? more than once or twice? or at all even? I can't recall, maybe once or twice in short yardage earlier but not since. So the Bombers would need a QB coming back for sure... I'd agree with Mike here that the only way a Willy trade works for the Bombers is a 3 way involving another team and Montreal (or BC i guess) (Glenn/Lulay) -
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Yup. Harris and Collaros are definitely 2 Guys who say Hello for sure. -
Hmm... Vs SASK who has a poor run defence and has a history of struggling against him... Yup Andrew Harris.
-
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Yeah. Right... the other way around. BC has montreals First. Well, forget that then -
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
How about.. To Toronto : Drew Willy To Winnipeg: Glenn plus BC's first from Montreal To Montreal: I have no friggin clue lol -
Lawless says there is trade market for Willy
Goalie replied to Mike's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
We'd need a veteran back up qb coming back to us for sure. Montreal makes sense with Glenn, can "finish" his career where had his most success. -
Trump and Vince Mcmahon are good friends. Trump and Vince both agree that any publicity is good publicity. And Trump and Vince might be right because nobody is talking about Hillary... they are talking about Trump. Good or Bad.... his name is out there every day. Plus the one thing he has that Hillary will never have is the fact that he's not a career politician. I don't think trump will win... I hope he doesn't I should say but it wouldn't surprise me if he does
-
All of it happened. Jets have no interest in Crouse.
-
WWE Legend Mr Fuji dies at the age of 82 this morning
-
Dano is better than Crouse. It's not close. You can say what you want but if the Jets wanted Crouse instead of Dano they'd have made the deal with Florida instead
-
Ya. Not even close. Dano is the better player by far. I feel this has to be a troll post from you tho
-
Get Dressler and Smith back. I think that might help. I don't think you necessarily need a big huge receiver to do jump balls .... I think having a couple guys tho who can make people miss helps. Wonder if running a swing pass to a guy like McDuffie might work.
-
Very 2011 ish in my opinion so far. I guess the 1 thing I'll say about the O is... sure would be nice to see what they can do with dressler smith Denmark Mayo and Kohlert. Guess that might be playing a bit of a role right now also in terms of lack of O production. Starting a couple rookie receivers every week right so will be interesting to see what happens when dressler and smith are healthy
-
I'm not even just talking about last night tho. Our D is averaging like 5 turnovers a game the last 4 games. Ya montreal has a very good D but when you begin 3 drives inside the Montreal 35 pretty much and come away with 3 fgs.... that's not very good O production. Even 1 touchdown there would have made a difference. Gotta make teams pay for their mistakes with TDS. And no... I know there's another team on the field.... I mean Cmon I've watched for 20 years now.... Bombers need to be better in the red zone. Need more tds Did you know that mo Leggett has 3 pick 6 tds and No bomber receiver has 3. That's an issue. Need more production from the O. Most nights 1 td a game won't do it
-
So now there's not only positrons and negatrons but willy mavens and Nichols lovers I guess ?? Perhaps it's just me but I don't really give a crap who the qb is... it's irrelevant.... I don't know why pointing out flaws is considered hating Nichols and loving Willy. It's not about Nichols or Willy. It's about winning a game. Yeah they have done that 4 times in a row now but if you aren't winning when your D is forcing huge amounts of turnovers you have problems. It's great that we are winning but make no mistake about it.... it's 99 percent on the backs of our D and special teams. 6 turnovers and we win by what? 14? Should be winning by double that getting 6 turnovers a game and I get that's it's not all on the qb.
-
Fun fact: Jets were offered Crouse and Florida 1st for Ladd... said no. At the 2016 draft b4 trading pick 22 and 36 to Philly for pick 18 and the 3rd Rd pick... Florida offered Crouse for pick 22. Jets said No again. Crouse probably not as good as some think he will be. Pretty average player. Probably 3rd liner at best
-
And stafford and Lemieux lol. Stafford is RW. Sucks on the left. Lemieux is LW
-
You missed the point. Point being.... Nichols has been very average the last couple 3 games now. Very very average. That's enough right now. He's also had games where the other team should have more interceptions but has dropped them. Bottom line.. the D and special teams had 6 takeaways... just like the week b4 the bye and we won by what? 14 points both games.... the O is not doing enough. What the D and Special teams are doing is not sustainable. Eventually you need the O to put up more than 1 touchdown a game
-
Perfect example of why you don't ever lay off an opponent. Esks layed off. It almost cost them. The game wasn't as close as the score In my opinion if you can win 70 to nothing then you win 70 nothing. You don't lay off cuz you have a lead.