Goalie

Eriksson is awful. I'd do buff for 1st 3rd the Russian and a D prospect. No to Eriksson. He Is a waste. The Russian is a pretty good player really. He's not ovechkin but honestly I think he's better than Burmi. Has higher upside at least

Not firing MB and now this apparently.... losing faith. Or #Idontbelieveinblue

Hopefully to the PR. Did Marcel have him in Hamilton?

Bombers will win still cuz really the riders D is awful and that can't be fixed in a week. Sask sucks. You will find out this week it's tge lack of talent that makes sask suck. Chamblin will be vindicated. Bombers in a blow out.

Can't defend a QB who can't throw the ball more than 7 yards with accuracy. Can't defend a QB who only looks for 2 guys. Can't defend a QB who throws the ball in to double coverage constantly when he does go deep. Marve isn't good and I don't think any sort of play calling could help him to be honest. MB sucks but Marve sucked even more. Ya 2 games isn't enough but it's enough to say he's not ready and might never be

I think you'd be taken more seriously if you didn't make **** up. For real. Trying to help you out. Your agenda pushing has gotten a bit out of control

Reilly could actually throw passes more than 7 yards

They have a funny way of showing it...... Or you watching on TV or in the stands just refuse to see it. Guys in the know and people around the cfl vs a fan on a message board. Hmm. Who to believe

Make room. Doubt they have too tho. Probably nowhere near the cap

Cut simmons and sign wild. Dude bleeds blue n gold.

Didn't post the tweet where Morley says January is better than all 5 guys on the oline eh?

That last paragraph about O'shea being a coach players want to play for should shut some people up... but won't

I'd rather give Lewis or Longo a chance. Not some stop gap.

96 yards of O after 3 quarters. Yeah I'd fold too. Why bother really. 2 and out 90 percent of the game. The D didn't fold tho. They just got no help from the O. At all. The O didn't fold. They sucked all game long. 135 or so net O yards. Think about it.

Brohm sucks but Marve isn't really better so far either.

Might mean they are shipping pav

Veltung J adams K Bass have all been good finds. Collins and Marshall too.

No.

A 3 4 d might not be terrible either

Dudes twitter pic is still of the bombers

NO. Marve to lots of people, who 17 is talking about really were proclaiming him to be the saviour and second coming, say he's gonna take Willys job and all this nonsense. I'm not sure where those people are anymore either. It's pretty obvious the guy either just doesn't get it, doesn't have the brains really, or just doesn't have the ability.. or both really. Seen it so many times, the 2nd or 3rd stringer getting all this fanfare, play him and he's not good and people just don't want to accept it. I'll be honest, I think Marve has some potential but only as a 3rd string short yardage guy, Justin Goltz 2.0 really.... I'm at the point where i'm not sure if it's worth it to keep trying Marve anymore, Definitely can't play Brohm but honestly, i dunno if he'd be any worse than Marve was.

Waggoner seems to be getting the HENOC Muamba treatment here, lots of people were shitting on Henoc his first year, perhaps some people put to high of expectations on guys and when they don't meet those ridiculously high expectations immediately, they are a waste really. Not comparing the 2 but... It's pretty similar the treatment waggoner is getting here. Is our Oline bad? part of me thinks not really, part of me thinks we have 3 solid pieces, 2 of those happens to be rookies in Goossen and Chungh and ofcourse Bryant... Part of me, a large part of me thinks our oline looks worse than they are because of our O schemes, MB really. I think if you fire MB, you will see that the oline while not dominating, that takes more than 9 games really, they aren't as bad as they appear to be. I think the olines biggest problem is MB, outside of the one guard and center position when Picard plays really... but for the most part, they aren't as bad as they appear to be. This MB in montreal in 2007 thing with a good oline and AC, made them look awful, fired and the next year, they looked very good. The oline has changed a bit from last year but the results are similar, it tells me it's not so much the talent as it is the Schemes they are running, that's on MB really.

Well, not to be that guy but apparently, you can base this on just a guess, but i think a pretty damn good guess at that... some other team obviously felt highly enough on Waggoner to offer their first round pick too, BC is my guess and they aren't much better than we are right now. If at all actually. Bombers only used their first round pick cuz some other team or even teams wanted to use theirs on waggoner too. and Honestly, this is kind of a moot point at the moment talking about next years draft.. who knows what happens between now and then... maybe we make a trade and get a first round pick, who really knows. Greaves and or Neufeld could very well get us a first round pick from somebody.

Can't build a house without a foundation. A good team builds from the O Line out as the foundation. We don't have it.. Thing is tho, there are tons of blocks out there to build a house out of, you just need to go down to the home depot or whatever to get them and they will send you all the blocks you need in bulk, even some extra. That's not how it works in the canadian draft... last game 2 of those blocks played tho, Goossen and Chungh, Bryant is good also so they have the start of this foundation... but unlike building a house, there is no home depot when it comes to the oline, you have to draft them, you don't have to draft them in round 1 either. Honestly, this was walters second draft... he took oline in the first round in both... both look to have some ability to play, I didn't think Goossen was that awful last game and i don't think Chungh has been terrible either but they are still rookies really and with rookies, come mistakes, it takes time. It's rare to find an oline who can step in and dominate right away, it really is. Labatte is the exception not the norm really. Honestly, you can talk of building a house all you want, but in my opinion... this is more like tearing down the old one and building a new one from scratch, that doesn't happen over night really. it takes time.

I'll tell you this much, you bring in higgins and you keep MB and the same stuff will happen next year. MB has a history of this crap, going back to Montreal... that team with a very good oline gave up the most sacks in the league, he was fired and next season with the same oline and the same AC, they gave up like 26 sacks all season long. People are so quick to point the blame at the head coach when in reality, a head coach who has lost the room looks like Chamblin in SASK, not O'shea in WPG. The depth and the Offensive play calling is killing this team right now. It's what killed it last year too... do we not see the pattern here?