Jesse

That's why they're keeping so many guys around, I guess. Every gets a chance to show their stuff. The one thing MOS did say about the receivers, is that everyone is having good and bad moments. Just waiting for someone to take the job.

When it comes to Rutledge (or other examples of guys staying in depth roles or bouncing back and forth from the PR), and I’ve mentioned this a couple of times now, we can’t take the onus off of the player. I know we get excited when we see a guy make plays in game, but we also don’t know if he’s not where he should be on the field within the scheme, is he playing selfishly, is he dogging it in practice or in meetings? There’s so much that we don’t see. And we’ve been far too successful to think guys are losing snaps for no reason. As to competitions in training camp, obviously there are guys who walk in to TC safe. But we also saw with Andrew Harris that when they lose their stuff, they’re gone. We brought in Daley when we weren’t getting enough at SAM, eventually replaced him. We acknowledged our kicking game wasn’t enough and kept bringing back Castillio, brought Lawler back into the fold. We are capable of recognizing weaknesses. And again, I am all on board with some of MOS’s roster management decisions. I’m just also acknowledging that there’s a lot we don’t see.

It’s funny that you list the examples of the coaches doing exactly what you want them to do. We bring in LBs and DTs and QBs every year. But they have to prove that they can hang in there first, and then they have to stick around to show that they know the play book, are culture fits, etc. And I do agree with you in principle, but I really think you’re banging the drum too hard. It’s almost like arguing with aards on the other forum. Even when I agree with him, he just takes it so far in one direction that I feel the need to disagree with him.

Absolutely. But I’m solely talking about the on field performance.

I brought this up earlier too. The onus is on the players to prove themselves.

Yup. Our first game came really early. Haven't a lot of practice time with anyone to make cut down decisions.

I honestly don't think Chad Kelly is that good. Toronto is a stacked team and I think Dukes will carry them just fine.

Starting is such a dumb term for DT though. It doesn’t matter how he’s listed on the DC, it’s what percentage of snaps he gets.

I think you're talking in circles here, man. Of course they earned their spots. There are always circumstances which dictate when guys are given their first opportunities.

I'm honestly not sure the point you're trying to make here, Booch. There's always a path to where a guy gets his opportunity. You explaining each guy's history doesn't make it a moot point. These are examples of Americans earning roster spots. This year, we'll see even more. I'm just pointing out that there' more that goes into it than the couple splash plays we see in games.

Now the problem with this line of thinking is guys like Alexander, Holm, Lawler, Nichols, Parker, Schoen, Streveler... who all came in and earned significant roles from Day 1. Obviously the process isn't and can't be perfect. But it's not like we have zero examples of it. Even with a veteran heavy team, there are examples every year of Americans coming in and earning spots.

MOS has to wear those mistakes you discuss. 100%. PR usage, designated Americans, The F'ing FB usage, letting players dictate too much. The things I give him the benefit of the doubt on are some roster decisions around new players coming in. A lot is discussed about MOS's loyalty to guys, but we also have examples of rookies coming in and playing right away. When we have players that look good in limited action and they can't seem to stay on the field, everyone gets all on MOS for staying loyal to whatever vet is in the guts way, but no one asks what the player is or is not doing to get on the field. There is so much we don't see. When are they getting to practice, are the putting in the work off the field, in the meeting rooms, are they where they are supposed to be on the field on the plays we don't see? We know the formula for becoming one of the favourites. Steal snaps, be a hard worker, get in early, stay late, be a good teammate, know your role, etc, etc, etc. The one thing we can all agree on is the culture reset that has happened under the current regime. MOS is loyal to the guys who are good examples and set that culture. When a guy can't get on the field, we have to put some of the onus on the player too. Not just blame MOS for keeping a guy down.

Well, this is just a terrible post. He's infallible now? No critical analysis allowed?

As long as our key guys who have been absent in camp get healthy, no worries from me. Some exciting rookies and sophomores to root for.

Is this real?

Let’s see Wilson first

It took a second to line up the audio with cjob guys. Stop the madness,

I’ve been saying it in regards to Haba, but it applies to Garbutt too. DE’s in their second year. That’s when they take off (if they got the stuff).

Doug Brown on the Garbutt train now.

Nailed it

Can’t figure out how to line it up

Gotta let him practice the way he plays or there’s no point.

For now. We’ll see how long they play guys.

Their starters are going to beat the roster we brought.

I would douchenozzle the hell out of your podcast.