Jesse

I thought it was just kind of accepted that it was BC's turn. Probably Montreal in '26.

It matters to the players beyond bonuses.

It’s data mining for Genius.

The next HC doesn't need to be someone who has already been an HC.

How do they even hire an OC with the HC and GM on expiring contracts? Unless the guy is being hired to take over as the HC in a year…but man would that seemingly cause problems.

Shows the voters don’t watch the games. Also, Andrew Harris, wtf?

I personally hate it when they use the MOC to mean "most improved" rather than best.

They should.

Yeah, never heard that. We had an in with the Packers at the time and were told that Mulumba was a long shot, iirc.

Still has an OC.

100% - he has many things to prove. I'm just of the opinion you can't take away what he has done. Printers won MOP - he was absolutely the best QB in the league that year and BC dicked around trying to put Dickenson back in when Printers was their best option.

Yup, got tired of that too. Especially near the end. Totally different situation here. As Strev has already player here, and won, so now we're just wishing him the best.

Always thought this was super cheesy. And no way in hell MOS has ever done anything close to this. There are all kinds of ways to lead. Lapo just has too much of an ego to let the OC duties go. And, league-wide, that's been shown as an indicator of failure.

Suiter has no clue.

Collaros is locked up for the next 3 years. We're just following his career and hoping he qualifies for his NFL pension.

I can see Bo on any of the Eastern teams. There are a couple of coaching situations to work out first, then we may see some player movement. Imagine if MOS had all this locker room drama happening on his team and Walters didn't draft OL with every 1st round pick he had.

Did he sign onto TSN or something?

I think they’re American based. Talk about usfl, etc.

We haven’t seen 9 games like that for decades. I’m never seen it. I’m sorry, that does prove something. He still has to prove he can stay healthy and adjust to teams planning around him - but he’s destroyed pretty much every test he’s faced so far (and yes, I understand we crushed him - this isn’t a BC vs Winnipeg debate - We are clearly the superior team).

Respectfully, TB, no one agrees that he’s ahead of schedule - as you suggest. Most are in agreement that’s he’s right where he’s expected to be, but is playing on it anyway. And, frankly, his play and needing to keep it elevated to prevent swelling suggests that’s the correct take.

And I couldn’t care less where Rourke is from (though I understand that the Canadian bit adds to his marketability). It was just legit exciting to have a potential new starter in the league who is young. He was on pace to break records as a first year starter. That is a good thing. Without him, Zach is literally the only good QB in the entire league. The league needs new QBs. That’s all. If a random American guy comes up and is on pace to break Flutie’s yards and TD records, he’d get a butt kid of press too. And no one needs to act like Farhan around here, but suggesting Rourke sucks or other crap trying to lessen his accomplishments is something I’d expect to see on riderfans.

Literally no one would argue with you about any of that.

I don’t even think he’ll get there, he clearly shouldn’t be playing. So, you’re obviously a ****. But what about my comment indicated I was upset or offended?

You want me to explain why a sports league needs more superstars?

I like the idea of sportsmanship and helping up an opponent - especially since we don't have a trashy reputation. That said, there's something to be said for "welcoming a 'rookie' into the play-offs". You really need to get over yourself with the Rourke hate though. His success is nothing but good for the league. A rising tide raises all ships, ya know?