Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 So as much as we railed on Walters and co. for their poor US scouting and apparent lack of depth on the team during our poor start, based on the last few weeks we maybe have to revisit that idea. Here is the game 1 starting lineup and now the depth behind the starters (in some cases former starters): QB: Willy/Nichols HB: Harris WR: Davis WR: Dressler/K. Adams SB: Smith/Denmark SB: Davis SB: D. Adams/Mayo WR: Kohlert LT: Bryant LG: Hardrick/Bond C: Goossen RG: Chungh RT: Neufeld/Hardrick DE: Green/Cole DE: Westerman/Corney DT: Shologan DT: Cummings WIL: Bass/Wild MLB: Wild/Bass/Knox SAM: Leggett/Burnett CB: J. Adams/Frederick CB: Randle/Roberts HB: Posey/Fogg HB: B. Johnson S: M. Harris/Loffler I included guys like Knox and Burnett due to their work on teams, you could also add guys like Waggoner and D. Jones as well as they were Walters guys as well. Obviously it's only 2 games but based on the supposed issues we had with depth when we were 1-4 I think we need to acknowledge the fact that these depth guys have been integral to our success over the last 2 weeks. blitzmore, Tracker, ddanger and 1 other 4
Mike Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 I said all along we were a pretty good football team, we just needed a quarterback. Oddly enough, looks like for the time being, we've got one. ddanger, Nash00, Doublezero and 1 other 4
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 As an addendum, how nice was it to see Denmark back making plays for us out there. He was always such a class act here, I'm glad that there were no hard feelings from the offseason and he was able to come back. Our team is better with him in than without. Doublezero, Wanna-B-Fanboy, blitzmore and 7 others 10
Doublezero Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Good recruiting and roster management has been obvious last few games. That 6 game injured list is scary long and some of the so-called replacements look like they belong. In fact many of them are playing at a higher level than the team-mates they are replacing. D backfield is a case in point. You've got Randle out and Johnny Adams has yet to play - who do you sit to make room for them? Or do you? Nash00 and Wanna-B-Fanboy 2
Mike Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 At this point, our secondary when entirely healthy has got to be ... Randle/Fogg/Loffler/Johnson/Adams with Frederick as the 6th (but I think they usually shove a Canadian in that spot, so maybe not) But basically NFW does Macho get his spot back. Fogg is suddenly a stud now too. BigBlueFanatic, TBURGESS, Nash00 and 2 others 5
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 8 minutes ago, Doublezero said: Good recruiting and roster management has been obvious last few games. That 6 game injured list is scary long and some of the so-called replacements look like they belong. In fact many of them are playing at a higher level than the team-mates they are replacing. D backfield is a case in point. You've got Randle out and Johnny Adams has yet to play - who do you sit to make room for them? Or do you? I think at this point you have to let Adams back in there, but only when he is 110% ready. No need to rush him at this point. Randle needs to go back in, he's our best player back there. It's just nice to know that if an injury occurs, we have the guys ready to step in and make plays. A bonus is when the offseason rolls around if we need to shed salary (or a guy like Adams heads to the NFL) we don't need to look to a washed-up FA to backfill.
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 5 minutes ago, Mike said: At this point, our secondary when entirely healthy has got to be ... Randle/Fogg/Loffler/Johnson/Adams with Frederick as the 6th (but I think they usually shove a Canadian in that spot, so maybe not) But basically NFW does Macho get his spot back. Fogg is suddenly a stud now too. Ditto on Fogg. I wasn't sold on him in Week1 but man is he a keeper. His return skills are an extra asset but his coverage has been excellent. GCJenks 1
bearpants Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Jace Davis was considered the cream of the new WR crop this year... but I really like what we've seen from Mayo and Kris Adams (in limited action).... really loved that catch he made on the sidelines late in the game... it feels like so long since we've seen a receiver make a big catch to seal a game... Nash00 1
Mike Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Mayo should replace Davis when the little guys and Adams come back.
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 7 minutes ago, bearpants said: Jace Davis was considered the cream of the new WR crop this year... but I really like what we've seen from Mayo and Kris Adams (in limited action).... really loved that catch he made on the sidelines late in the game... it feels like so long since we've seen a receiver make a big catch to seal a game... He sure can go up and get it. Reminds me of Chris Matthews. 5 minutes ago, Mike said: Mayo should replace Davis when the little guys and Adams come back. The one thing I will give Davis is he is good at the LOS when he comes in to block. I saw a couple instances where he was able to crack down on the edge and open it up but for whatever reason we don't feel inclined to throw the ball his way. The first few weeks he was making plays and I saw one play last night where if Nichols had a second longer in the pocket Davis was open on the post and it would have been 6. Worked out OK though, he hit Mayo underneath and then hit Mayo again for that beautiful TD throw.
Arnold_Palmer Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 I haven't seen a Blue Bombers team with this much depth front to end in years. In years previously once a guy who was performing went down we were in trouble. We've had a lot of players stepping up and showing they below once they get their chance.
TBURGESS Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Depth certainly doesn't appear to be our problem. Some of the new guys are better than the guys they replaced and it will become a good problem for management when the injured get healthy. Their sure were a lot of complaints about our scouting in the off season, which seem to be completely wrong. MOBomberFan, ddanger, blitzmore and 1 other 4
pigseye Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 I think people were complaining because of who they chose to start instead of who deserved to start coming out of camp.
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 Sometimes it takes reps for guys to get a feel for the system and for the coaches to put them in a position to succeed. Far too often we write off players after one or two games saying that they don't have it but these things take time. Every now and then you find a guy who is plug and play right away but more often a player needs a few weeks to get his feet wet and really get acclimated. The problem with that is, and it was mentioned on TSN1290 yesterday, that it's better to learn and win at the same time as opposed to racking up L's as the guys get settled.
pigseye Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 That Kris Adams guy looks like he has some scary potential. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 3 minutes ago, pigseye said: That Kris Adams guy looks like he has some scary potential. His movement looks extremely laboured. I doubt his body holds up, mostly his lower body with that awful broken leg he's taken 3 years to come back from. Doublezero 1
Mr Dee Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Quote really loved that catch he made on the sidelines late in the game... it feels like so long since we've seen a receiver make a big catch to seal a game... I have to give credit where credit is due. Props to P.Lop for going back to K. Adams after a couple of difficult non-catches by Adams. I think Adams should/could have had the 1st sideline catch, but we had to have proof that he could make those...and now we have it. Great to see.
pigseye Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 6 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: His movement looks extremely laboured. I doubt his body holds up, mostly his lower body with that awful broken leg he's taken 3 years to come back from. I hope it's just mental because we need a wr who can out jump the defender for the ball.
rebusrankin Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 I have complained about Walters but he is proving me wrong.
Blueandgold Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 1 hour ago, Mike said: At this point, our secondary when entirely healthy has got to be ... Randle/Fogg/Loffler/Johnson/Adams with Frederick as the 6th (but I think they usually shove a Canadian in that spot, so maybe not) But basically NFW does Macho get his spot back. Fogg is suddenly a stud now too. I'm a big fan of Loffler, but even if we do go back to an all import secondary(which I don't expect to see) I'd like to see us move Leggett to safety, Randle to SAM and keep Frederick at corner. I believe that lineup would be the best secondary we can assemble with our talent. Macho should never play another down for this team.
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 5 minutes ago, pigseye said: I hope it's just mental because we need a wr who can out jump the defender for the ball. A couple of factors could play into that. First game in 3+ years and he did get banged up during the game. His injury history is concerning though but hopefully going forward they are just minor and he can continue to ball. Those jump balls could come in handy in situations like last night where he gets 1-on-1 against a smaller DB and it's just a case of going up the ladder.
Blueandgold Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 Does Mcduffie even get back on the roster? Fogg is a better returner than he is.
Mike Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 4 minutes ago, Blueandgold said: I'm a big fan of Loffler, but even if we do go back to an all import secondary(which I don't expect to see) I'd like to see us move Leggett to safety, Randle to SAM and keep Frederick at corner. I believe that lineup would be the best secondary we can assemble with our talent. Macho should never play another down for this team. Need Loffler for ratio purposes to keep three import OL though, which they better do. johnzo, Chaosmonkey and bb1 3
M.O.A.B. Posted August 4, 2016 Report Posted August 4, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Blueandgold said: Does Mcduffie even get back on the roster? Fogg is a better returner than he is. It wouldnt surprise if he will not. At this point I would rather have the Bombers carry another DB to give Fogg some rest after his run. Although with the way Nicholls & co is playing Fogg will get his rest from the sidelines. Edited August 4, 2016 by M.O.A.B.
Nash00 Posted August 4, 2016 Author Report Posted August 4, 2016 Just now, M.O.A.B. said: It wouldnt surprise if he will not. At this point I would rather have the Bombers carry another DB to give Fogg some rest after his run. McDuffie has been just fine back there. I would be cautious with using a full time DB as a returner on both punts and kickoffs. McDuffie also gives us an option on offense if we run into injuries there (unlikely I know) blitzmore, Bigblue204 and ddanger 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now