IC Khari Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Looks a lot like last years defence but Edmonton does have a great offence.
Noeller Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 This D is beyond awful... Horrendous. Complete liability. captaincanuck12 1
captaincanuck12 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Gave up too many big plays. Couldn't stop the run. Why wouldn't you fake a blitz and drop into coverage? Or vice versa? Keep the offense guessing. Of course Reilly had all day to throw. No pressure. Just pathetic
Tracker Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Our D-line which was completely retooled in off-season has not lived up to its promise. Cummings and Shologan are ineffective and the rotating defensive end opposite Westerman is inconsistent as hell.
Guest J5V Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Can't play for 60 minutes, not ready to play at the start of the game, again, completely undisciplined, terrible on both sides of the ball, at home, in a game we absolutely had to have. O'Shea complaining about penalties, mistakes, and needing to play cleaner. How about challenging the PI, Mike? Almost 500 yds of offense and 30 first downs by Edm. Wow.
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 33 26 if he challenges the PI. Makes no difference. Bottom line.... our D wasn't good. Our O started slow. I don't get how lack of execution Is on the coaches
Noeller Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Disgusting... Embarrassed by the lack of effort and scheme.
pigseye Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 That's the first full 60 mins the D has stunk it out since the streak. I'd say Hall's been figured out pretty thoroughly now and unless he finds a way to adjust the Bombers are going to keep getting killed in man-to-man matchups. Goalie and Noeller 2
Noeller Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 This D has been so bad for so long... Holy ****. I'm gonna be so mad for so long... ****. What a pile of steaming **** this was.
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 4 minutes ago, pigseye said: That's the first full 60 mins the D has stunk it out since the streak. I'd say Hall's been figured out pretty thoroughly now and unless he finds a way to adjust the Bombers are going to keep getting killed in man-to-man matchups. I agree but they did shut edmonton down in the 2nd half outside of a couple fgs and a long td. But I agree with your main point for sure. Hall has been figured out
iso_55 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 51 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: Make that the last 5 games. The last 2 especially the D has really looked soft. Back to back games where we needed a stop by our D to win/potentially win the game and both times they've crumbled. Starting to come back to earth at the worst possible time. Our D looked like the Etch D in 2014. Couldn't stop anything to seal a win late in the game.
iso_55 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 10 minutes ago, Noeller said: This D has been so bad for so long... Holy ****. I'm gonna be so mad for so long... ****. What a pile of steaming **** this was. If we go 8-10 do we still keep MOS?
IC Khari Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 25 minutes ago, iso_55 said: Our D looked like the Etch D in 2014. Couldn't stop anything to seal a win late in the game. Do we have any spare D lineman to play cornerback?
Old Bomber Fan Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 While I agree the defense was not good tonight I also thought the offense wasn't very good either. Yes we had over 300 yards of offense and scored what 26 points but we couldn't maintain drives; and we constantly continue to throw those dinkie little passes. I wouldn't mind it too much if we had the game in hand or at least were controlling the clock but we do neither. Further why in the name of ....... are we throwing the ball to Dressler in double and triple coverage time and time again. Kohert dropped several balls tonight, Smith was a non event, Dressler had one good catch and run for a TD and then we have Denmark who continues to catch everything thrown his way but is seldom used. He gets behind coverage like Dressler, is not as often in double coverage as Dressler is but for some reason is not thrown the ball. I guess we were out coached in that our game plan both offense and defense wasn't good enough. We were out played as well and reality is Edmonton has a better team talent wise than we do. Can we get into the playoffs; well with a little help from others we can but if we continue to play as we did tonight we will not need a little help but rather a lot of help. Here's hoping without rose coloured glasses. Goalie 1
do or die Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Our D the last 5 games.......... Noeller 1
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 24 minutes ago, Old Bomber Fan said: While I agree the defense was not good tonight I also thought the offense wasn't very good either. Yes we had over 300 yards of offense and scored what 26 points but we couldn't maintain drives; and we constantly continue to throw those dinkie little passes. I wouldn't mind it too much if we had the game in hand or at least were controlling the clock but we do neither. Further why in the name of ....... are we throwing the ball to Dressler in double and triple coverage time and time again. Kohert dropped several balls tonight, Smith was a non event, Dressler had one good catch and run for a TD and then we have Denmark who continues to catch everything thrown his way but is seldom used. He gets behind coverage like Dressler, is not as often in double coverage as Dressler is but for some reason is not thrown the ball. I guess we were out coached in that our game plan both offense and defense wasn't good enough. We were out played as well and reality is Edmonton has a better team talent wise than we do. Can we get into the playoffs; well with a little help from others we can but if we continue to play as we did tonight we will not need a little help but rather a lot of help. Here's hoping without rose coloured glasses. Well said.
Fatty Liver Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 Meh, the D stood up when they needed to, made some big plays that gave the O a chance to win the game which they couldn't deliver. Not really impressed with either side tonight, they kind of deserve each other. Fair to middlin' team is what they are right now.
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 What was the time of possession in the first half after the dressler TD cuz it seemed like edmonton owned it and not just cuz the D couldn't get off the field but cuz our O couldn't stay on it. Really good field position for Edmonton most of the first half also.
White Out Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Meh, the D stood up when they needed to, made some big plays that gave the O a chance to win the game which they couldn't deliver. Not really impressed with either side tonight, they kind of deserve each other. Fair to middlin' team is what they are right now. Is this sarcasm? Reilly completed 32 of 38 passes for 355 yards. White rushed for 104 yards on 19 carries. The Eskimos scored 40 points. What game were you watching?? Judd and iso_55 2
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 1 minute ago, White Out said: Is this sarcasm? Reilly completed 32 of 38 passes for 355 yards. White rushed for 104 yards on 19 carries. The Eskimos scored 40 points. What game were you watching?? Stats. Don't tell the whole story.
White Out Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Goalie said: Stats. Don't tell the whole story. No I guess they don't but the Bombers D was just terrible all evening. Any time the offense managed to score the Eskimos just marched right back down the field and answered. Edited October 1, 2016 by White Out iso_55 1
Goalie Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 No doubt but it's not like our O was doing much for 3 quarters either
White Out Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Goalie said: No doubt but it's not like our O was doing much for 3 quarters either Dress fumble at the 2, and, a return for touchdown that was called back on a phantom penalty. the O and ST did enough to win, the D was as porous as a sponge. Edited October 1, 2016 by White Out
Fatty Liver Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 22 minutes ago, White Out said: Is this sarcasm? Reilly completed 32 of 38 passes for 355 yards. White rushed for 104 yards on 19 carries. The Eskimos scored 40 points. What game were you watching?? The game I watched had an inconsistent offensive attack with plenty of two and outs with a sporadic drive or two. Neither side played well enough to earn the victory and the ST game was about as sparky as a bowl of cold porridge.
iso_55 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Posted October 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: The game I watched had an inconsistent offensive attack with plenty of two and outs with a sporadic drive or two. Neither side played well enough to earn the victory and the ST game was about as sparky as a bowl of cold porridge. You can't hang this loss on the offense when the Esks O moved the ball downfield at will on our defense & the refs had a boner for the Eskimos all night.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now