Floyd Posted October 27, 2016 Report Posted October 27, 2016 Too much pressure picking first. I want second overall. Dascow 1
Dascow Posted October 30, 2016 Author Report Posted October 30, 2016 So now that Montreal has beaten Calgary, are the Bombers guaranteed at least the 2nd overall pick?
M.O.A.B. Posted October 30, 2016 Report Posted October 30, 2016 On 2016-10-30 at 11:09 PM, Dascow said: So now that Montreal has beaten Calgary, are the Bombers guaranteed at least the 2nd overall pick? Expand We'll get first overall Noeller and Tracker 2
kcin94 Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 (edited) On 2016-10-30 at 11:09 PM, Dascow said: So now that Montreal has beaten Calgary, are the Bombers guaranteed at least the 2nd overall pick? Expand Yes. That guarantees at worst 2nd overall. The only we don't get first is if Toronto wins, and not both of Montreal and Saskatchewan win. Edited October 31, 2016 by kcin94
bigg jay Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 What Montreal does is irrelevant, they can't finish lower than Toronto or Saskatchewan because of the tie breakers. The only way we end up with the 2nd pick is if the Riders lose and the Argos win.
M.O.A.B. Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 On 2016-10-31 at 2:40 AM, bigg jay said: What Montreal does is irrelevant, they can't finish lower than Toronto or Saskatchewan because of the tie breakers. The only way we end up with the 2nd pick is if the Riders lose and the Argos win. Expand It is relevant (for us) since if there's a 3 way tie Ssk will end up with the first overall. If only Ssk and Tor ends up with the tie, Tor (or Wpg) will end up with the first overall since Ssk holds the tie-breaker vs Tor.
bigg jay Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 Yep. Forgot that 3 way ties are broken differently. Montreal owns the tie breaker over both other teams individually but their head to head record is the 1st tie breaker if all 3 teams are tied. Sask is 1-3 while Toronto is 2-2. Probably irrelevant though. The chances of both Toronto and Saskatchewan winning are pretty slim.
M.O.A.B. Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 (edited) To add... IF WPG wins Friday... Both EDM (vs TOR) and BC (vs SSK) has still something to fight for so their games are not meaningless by any means. MTL vs HAM on the other hand could be a snooze fest since HAM is already secured to host the cross over team from the West. They will probably wont play Collaros the whole game and make sure he's healthy for the playoffs. Edited October 31, 2016 by M.O.A.B.
kcin94 Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-10-31 at 9:21 PM, M.O.A.B. said: To add... IF WPG wins Friday... Both EDM (vs TOR) and BC (vs SSK) has still something to fight for so their games are not meaningless by any means. MTL vs HAM on the other hand could be a snooze fest since HAM is already secured to host the cross over team from the West. They will probably wont play Collaros the whole game and make sure he's healthy for the playoffs. Expand If we win Friday, what does Edmonton have to play for?
Blueandgold Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 2:56 AM, kcin94 said: If we win Friday, what does Edmonton have to play for? Expand If we lose Edmonton might prefer to LOSE so they can go play in Hamilton for the ESF. I don't see any reason the Esks will actually want to beat the Argos, aside from maybe arrogance.
bearpants Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 3:12 AM, Blueandgold said: If we lose Edmonton might prefer to LOSE so they can go play in Hamilton for the ESF. I don't see any reason the Esks will actually want to beat the Argos, aside from maybe arrogance. Expand I think Edm will beat toronto just by showing up...
O2L Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 3:34 PM, bearpants said: I think Edm will beat toronto just by showing up... Expand I'm sure Calgary felt the same way about Montreal.
Goalie Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) On 2016-11-01 at 3:12 AM, Blueandgold said: If we lose Edmonton might prefer to LOSE so they can go play in Hamilton for the ESF. I don't see any reason the Esks will actually want to beat the Argos, aside from maybe arrogance. Expand They are defending Champs. I'd imagine they, like BC and WPG , want to be in the west semi because they all want to beat Calgary in the West Final. Edited November 1, 2016 by Goalie
Taynted_Fayth Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 6:31 PM, Goalie said: They are defending Champs. I'd imagine they, like BC and WPG , want to be in the west semi because they all want to beat Calgary in the West Final. Expand a caller on CJOB last night made a decent point, one way or another Calgary will need to get beat. I think we'd have a better chance beating them at BMO then McMahon Tracker 1
Jpan85 Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 Can you imagine if we beat BC Calgary and Edmonton to the cup. Would be one of the all time runs. Noeller, Tracker and wbbfan 3
Goalie Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 6:45 PM, Taynted_Fayth said: a caller on CJOB last night made a decent point, one way or another Calgary will need to get beat. I think we'd have a better chance beating them at BMO then McMahon Expand I'd rather beat them at Mcmahon Dr. Blue 1
Dascow Posted November 1, 2016 Author Report Posted November 1, 2016 (edited) When the Stamps play in the Western Final on Nov. 20, they will have had 20 days off and Bo Levi Mitchell will have not played in a game in 30 days. (Basically a month!) If any anyone is going to catch the Stamps on a bad day, the Western Final would be the most likely day. I think the Bombers would have their best chance if they played the Stamps after such a long layoff instead of in the biggest game of the year in the Grey Cup. Edited November 1, 2016 by Dascow Tracker and Dirty30 2
brett_c_b Posted November 5, 2016 Report Posted November 5, 2016 so back to the topic of the draft order, do we pick 1st? Toronto looking like they're about to lose and finish with 5 wins, Sask if they lose is also at 5. Week 2: Toronto 30 - Sask 17 Week 17: Sask 29 - Toronto 11 So they split the season series, but points are 46-41 for Sask, so in theory they finish ahead of Toronto in the overall standings, leaving Toronto last and us picking 1st?
bigg jay Posted November 5, 2016 Report Posted November 5, 2016 As long as Edmonton doesn't crap the bed late, then yes we pick 1st. Montreal eliminated the possibility of a 3 way tie with their win earlier today.
Eternal optimist Posted November 5, 2016 Report Posted November 5, 2016 On 2016-11-01 at 8:07 PM, Dascow said: When the Stamps play in the Western Final on Nov. 20, they will have had 20 days off and Bo Levi Mitchell will have not played in a game in 30 days. (Basically a month!) If any anyone is going to catch the Stamps on a bad day, the Western Final would be the most likely day. I think the Bombers would have their best chance if they played the Stamps after such a long layoff instead of in the biggest game of the year in the Grey Cup. Expand Add on top of that, it's well into November at that point - the weather could also play a factor as well. I think based on our D that might actually be an additional benefit to the Bombers. That said, B.C. first, whether it be at home or away.
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 6, 2016 Report Posted November 6, 2016 On 2016-10-27 at 2:48 PM, Floyd said: Too much pressure picking first. I want second overall. Expand Laine vs PoolParty
SpeedFlex27 Posted November 6, 2016 Report Posted November 6, 2016 On 2016-10-31 at 9:10 PM, Jpan85 said: Expand
SpeedFlex27 Posted November 6, 2016 Report Posted November 6, 2016 It's about time we got the #1 pick as it was taken from us in the 2014 Draft to give Ottawa the very first pick. It was Our Turn!!
M.O.A.B. Posted November 6, 2016 Report Posted November 6, 2016 (edited) #1 WPG (via TOR) #2 SSK #3 BC (via MTL) Edited November 6, 2016 by M.O.A.B.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now