SPuDS Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 3:45 PM, Atomic said: Pretty restrained excitement... Expand yea I didn't really see anything beyond a textual golf clap in the possibility of signing him.. depth and having experience in the CFL game and not being totally inept is not really a bad thing.. not quite sure where he saw excitement... off-season cant end soon enough I suppose. JCon 1
JCon Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 Incremental improvements, whenever and however you can. That should be the Bombers goal each and every day. SPuDS 1
Bigblue204 Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 3:50 PM, Floyd said: Context is also 'coming off achilles injury'... Expand right but, it's not like we sign him and he's 100% going to be on the team. What are the options at CND Rec right now? You'd rather old man Getztlaf? No one is suggesting the bombers sign him for $240,000. There is zero harm in bringing him in and letting him compete.
Noeller Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 3:30 PM, wbbfan said: Watt would be nice. I also like vaughan. Wouldnt mind having him case one of our 2nd year guys take a step back. Imop watt would be the better WR while JFG the better teams, blocker etc. Expand I've always been curious...what does the P stand for in IMOP? I know IMO = In My Opinion, but what's the P for? wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:07 PM, Noeller said: I've always been curious...what does the P stand for in IMOP? I know IMO = In My Opinion, but what's the P for? Expand Its purpose is to make you ask why Noeller 1
TheAardvark Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:07 PM, Noeller said: I've always been curious...what does the P stand for in IMOP? I know IMO = In My Opinion, but what's the P for? Expand Its a silent P, like in swimming... wbbfan, Noeller, Mark F and 2 others 5
rebusrankin Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 Watt is worth a look. People say don't sign him but are happy with Richards who has done less than Jade his first two years and Coates who in his career has less yards than Watt last year? TBURGESS 1
Atomic Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:41 PM, rebusrankin said: Watt is worth a look. People say don't sign him but are happy with Richards who has done less than Jade his first two years and Coates who in his career has less yards than Watt last year? Expand Well, potential plays into it, of course. Richards and Coates are 23 and 25. You probably wouldn't say we should re-sign Jeff Keeping because he has way more starts than Michael Couture. sweep the leg, wbbfan, BigBlueFanatic and 1 other 4
rebusrankin Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:44 PM, Atomic said: Well, potential plays into it, of course. Richards and Coates are 23 and 25. You probably wouldn't say we should re-sign Jeff Keeping because he has way more starts than Michael Couture. Expand Oh, I like Richards potential and hope he breaks out. Just saying can't always hope it happens. Coates, I don't see the upside.
wbbfan Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:44 PM, Atomic said: Well, potential plays into it, of course. Richards and Coates are 23 and 25. You probably wouldn't say we should re-sign Jeff Keeping because he has way more starts than Michael Couture. Expand I think the argument against would be Richards up side plus JFG for a steady guy means we dont need watt. But with cfl vet deals not being guaranteed and watt not being a guy whose gonna get a monster bonus to come the cost difference is moot. We arent in a position even with watt of having too much competition at a spot (see montreal and qbs last year) and its our lowest production spot so certainly a push would be good. I think richards needs a big push this year any way.
WBBFanWest Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 Is anyone else thrilled by the fact that we're this close to training camp and the most contentious issue is who our 5th receiver is going to be? BigBlueFanatic, CodyT, SPuDS and 3 others 6
GCn20 Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 I see zero downside to bringing in any NAT WR/SB until we find one that can play and produce. Do we need Watt..nope,,,would he be a bad signing? Absolutely not. SPuDS and TBURGESS 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:59 PM, wbbfan said: I think the argument against would be Richards up side plus JFG for a steady guy means we dont need watt. But with cfl vet deals not being guaranteed and watt not being a guy whose gonna get a monster bonus to come the cost difference is moot. We arent in a position even with watt of having too much competition at a spot (see montreal and qbs last year) and its our lowest production spot so certainly a push would be good. I think richards needs a big push this year any way. Expand Well Richards has barely been able to play and is again returning from significant surgeries. We probably need to have 2 NI receivers on the roster to fulfill the one starting spot, otherwise you're looking at making a ratio change on the OL or playing Normand every down if there's an in-game injury. We only have 3 to choose from as of today, plus 2017 picks (pick really as BTP is not really a receiver prospect). Also a bit of a reach to think that whoever makes the team lasts all 18 games, chances are we'll end up dressing 3-4 by the end of the year. IMO they need to add someone for training camp and if they don't will more than likely need to add someone during the season. Mark F 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 11:15 AM, BBlink said: Watt would be a decent pickup. Don't think his salary demands would be outrageous. Expand Apparently salary was one of the reasons he was let go in Hamilton.
TheAardvark Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 5:00 PM, WBBFanWest said: Is anyone else thrilled by the fact that we're this close to training camp and the most contentious issue is who our 5th receiver is going to be? Expand I think the question mark at MLB might be a little more contentious, but yes, it is awesome that we are no longer worried about if we have enough starters, rather that we are going to have to make some decisions about backups who may be too good to be backups... Mark F and Floyd 2
JCon Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 5:12 PM, SpeedFlex27 said: Apparently salary was one of the reasons he was let go in Hamilton. Expand His salary, yes, that makes sense, but not necessarily his salary demands. He was signed two years ago, coming off a big year in Toronto. It makes sense his contract was big. Then he got hurt and had low production last year. If I were the Ti-Cats, I wouldn't be excited to pay him what he was worth two years ago when he signed as a FA.
TrueBlue Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 5:12 PM, SpeedFlex27 said: Apparently salary was one of the reasons he was let go in Hamilton. Expand Because Hamilton didn't want to pay him one. Floyd 1
Floyd Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 4:41 PM, rebusrankin said: Watt is worth a look. People say don't sign him but are happy with Richards who has done less than Jade his first two years and Coates who in his career has less yards than Watt last year? Expand I'd love to see another NI Rec in camp... but again a 28 year old REC with bad knees and ACL surgery is not that guy
Fatty Liver Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:32 PM, Floyd said: I'd love to see another NI Rec in camp... but again a 28 year old REC with bad knees and ACL surgery is not that guy Expand Exactly, better options could present themselves once teams begin to cut down their rosters after TC.
Atomic Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:32 PM, Floyd said: I'd love to see another NI Rec in camp... but again a 28 year old REC with bad knees and ACL surgery is not that guy Expand Why do you hate Spencer Watt so much? I find him electrifying SPuDS, Floyd, MOBomberFan and 1 other 4
BBlink Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:32 PM, Floyd said: I'd love to see another NI Rec in camp... but again a 28 year old REC with bad knees and ACL surgery is not that guy Expand If you define him by his age and injury history... But if you can get him on a "last chance in football" contract it's probably worth the "chance". You have the incumbent, the high draft pick, the safe depth guy. Why not go for the home run? At worst you cut him in training camp. At best he's better than JFG. Besides, who else is out there? JCon and bearpants 2
BBlink Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:36 PM, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Exactly, better options could present themselves once teams begin to cut down their rosters after TC. Expand Sure. So you cross that bridge when you get there. Waiting and hoping is not a great strategy for a CFL GM SPuDS, JCon and sweep the leg 3
Atomic Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:53 PM, BBlink said: Sure. So you cross that bridge when you get there. Waiting and hoping is not a great strategy for a CFL GM Expand Also nothing stopping us from cutting Watt after TC and picking up one of these awesome Canadian players that other teams are cutting for some reason CodyT, SPuDS, BBlink and 2 others 5
WBBFanWest Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 6:51 PM, Atomic said: Why do you hate Spencer Watt so much? I find him electrifying Expand Ha! I'm all amped up by the current talk about Watt bearpants, SPuDS, JCon and 1 other 4
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted May 16, 2017 Report Posted May 16, 2017 On 2017-05-16 at 7:04 PM, WBBFanWest said: Ha! I'm all amped up by the current talk about Watt Expand He's only electrifying when he runs the right circuit. Floyd and bearpants 2
Recommended Posts