Mark F Posted September 26, 2019 Report Posted September 26, 2019 the formerly loyal Trump underlings are in open warfare. It has literally gotten to the point of "If I'm goin down, I'm takin you with me" No doubt they all have something on each other. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Zontar Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 Best take so far "What if the Steele Dossier and the Blasey-Ford allegation had a baby? "
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, Zontar said: Best take so far "What if the Steele Dossier and the Blasey-Ford allegation had a baby? " How much of the Steele dossier is verified? How much of it has been discredited? Who is a more credible person? Blaisey-ford or Kavanaugh? Stick to football- your team is going to get stomped. Edited September 27, 2019 by wanna-b-fanboy Mark F and Wideleft 2
The Unknown Poster Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 1 hour ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: How much of the Steele dossier is verified? How much of it has been discredited? Who is a more credible person? Blaisey-ford or Kavanaugh? Stick to football- your team is going to stomped. 1. Most of it 2. None of it. 3. Ford. 4. Yup Wanna-B-Fanboy and Mark F 2
do or die Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 (edited) Rudy sees trouble over the hill. Now throwing people (State Dept.) under that bus, right and left: https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/463340-giuliani-state-department-official-should-step-forward-i-wasnt The wheels on the bus, go round and round. Edited September 27, 2019 by do or die Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 21 minutes ago, do or die said: Rudy sees trouble over the hill. Now throwing people (State Dept.) under that bus, right and left: https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/463340-giuliani-state-department-official-should-step-forward-i-wasnt The wheels on the bus, go round and round. He's about to go full Rudy! “I’m the legitimate whistleblower,” Giuliani responded. “I have uncovered corruption that this Washington swamp has been covering up effectively for years and his State Department, you know, asked me to do this. So Mike, if you’re unhappy with me, I’m sorry but I accomplished my mission.” “I have no idea if he is unhappy with me or not,” Giuliani added. “Frankly, I don’t care. I’m the president’s lawyer!” Mark F 1
bustamente Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 Crazy bugged eyes fool Giuliani is calling himself a hero, well of course he is and he can keep telling himself that went put in a cell next to Trump and any of his other cronies who may have taken part with the cover up that has supposedly taken place in the WH.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 I wonder if these calls were buried like the Ukraine one..
Mark F Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 15 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: I wonder if these calls were buried like the Ukraine one.. "Russia hopes the U.S. doesn’t release transcripts of President Donald Trump’s conversations with Vladimir Putin as it did this week with his talks with the Ukrainian leader, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday." Translation " I can't stand stand squealers. Hit that guy!" Albert Anastasia Vladimir Putin Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Wideleft Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 NRA Was 'Foreign Asset' To Russia Ahead of 2016, New Senate Report Reveals September 27, 201910:01 AM ET "The National Rifle Association acted as a "foreign asset" for Russia in the period leading up to the 2016 election, according to a new investigation unveiled Friday by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. Drawing on contemporaneous emails and private interviews, an 18-month probe by the Senate Finance Committee's Democratic staff found that the NRA underwrote political access for Russian nationals Maria Butina and Alexander Torshin more than previously known — even though the two had declared their ties to the Kremlin. The report, available here, also describes how closely the gun rights group was involved with organizing a 2015 visit by some of its leaders to Moscow. Then-NRA vice president Pete Brownell, who would later become NRA president, was enticed to visit Russia with the promise of personal business opportunities — and the NRA covered a portion of the trip's costs. The conclusions of the Senate investigation could have legal implications for the NRA, Wyden says. Tax-exempt organizations are barred from using funds for the personal benefit of its officials or for actions significantly outside their stated missions. The revelations in the Senate report raise questions about whether the NRA could face civil penalties or lose its tax-exempt status." https://www.npr.org/2019/09/27/764879242/nra-was-foreign-asset-to-russia-ahead-of-2016-new-senate-report-reveals?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_term=nprnews Wanna-B-Fanboy and Mark F 2
do or die Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 NRA underwrote political access for Foxy Butina and that other guy....in return for funnelling a bunch of dough, 30M which ended up in the Trump campaign coffers. Keep following that money.... Wideleft, Mark F and Wanna-B-Fanboy 3
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 Now if only the Democrats have the stones to actually compel a testimony from them... we shall see. I foresee a lot of this:
bustamente Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 If they show up and claim absolute immunity, ,make then plead the 5th, if not hold them in contempt. If Giuiliani claims executive privilege just throw him in jail.😁
JCon Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 4 minutes ago, bustamente said: If they show up and claim absolute immunity, ,make then plead the 5th, if not hold them in contempt. If Giuiliani claims executive privilege just throw him in jail.😁 You really don't want to give Giuliani and Barr immunity. Mark F 1
johnzo Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 I suspect questioning Rudy would be complicated given that he can claim attorney-client privilege. But the dude is such a random shitshow that who knows if he'll be able to keep a lid on it when he's under questioning. For federal criminal trials in the US where attorneys are effectively co-conspirators, like in organized crime scenarios, there are ways to compel attorney testimony. Don't know how it would work for Congress.
bustamente Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 There has to be a way to get answers instead of witnesses dodging and claiming executive immunity, whats the use of a subpoena if they don't show up and nothing happens, isn't opening an impeachment inquiry supposed to open more doors and get answers?
Mark F Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 (edited) Find out why quatar loaned Kushner one half billion. Any calls on that ? any calls on what stocks to buy or sell cause trump is issuing a threat next day? it should all be in play. Edited September 27, 2019 by Mark F Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 17 minutes ago, Mark F said: Find out why quatar loaned Kushner one half billion. Any calls on that ? any calls on what stocks to buy or sell cause trump is issuing a threat next day? it should all be in play. Shorting stock that trump **** talks the following day could be very lucrative. Mark F 1
The Unknown Poster Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 How soon will this guy be in front of Congress Mark F 1
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 43 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: How soon will this guy be in front of Congress As early as next week it seems.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 Wow- that is some serious lobbying- like Hardcore lobbying with leverage...
The Unknown Poster Posted September 27, 2019 Report Posted September 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: Wow- that is some serious lobbying- like Hardcore lobbying with leverage... He might want to think twice Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
TrueBlue4ever Posted September 28, 2019 Report Posted September 28, 2019 16 hours ago, johnzo said: I suspect questioning Rudy would be complicated given that he can claim attorney-client privilege. But the dude is such a random shitshow that who knows if he'll be able to keep a lid on it when he's under questioning. For federal criminal trials in the US where attorneys are effectively co-conspirators, like in organized crime scenarios, there are ways to compel attorney testimony. Don't know how it would work for Congress. He's already setting himself up for that, throwing out suggestions for Trump to follow in the media. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/27/politics/giuliani-testimony-protected-interview/index.html The most disgusting part of Guliani's statement is his open contempt for the process: Asked if he was concerned he would be subpoenaed by the House, Giuliani laughed. "I consider them a joke. A sad joke. They have no legitimacy. I would think of challenging their subpoena on the grounds that they're not a legitimate committee," Giuliani said. These are the duly elected representatives doing the duty the US public put them in office for. So I guess Rudy thinks democracy is a sad joke with no legitimacy. As a lawyer, if he said that about a sitting judge he was in front of, he'd be cited for contempt and held in jail. Pathetic. Mark F and Wanna-B-Fanboy 2
Recommended Posts