Tracker Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 1 minute ago, TrueBlue4ever said: First SAG, now Costco. Who will Mr. “cancel culture is ruining America” cancel next? And will anyone ever care? The letters are good for a laugh, though. Trump has become lost in his fantasy world. There's enough material here to keep a convention of psychiatrists busy for awhile.
Rich Posted February 8, 2021 Author Report Posted February 8, 2021 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-quit-costco-letter/ One of the problems with Trump, is you never are really entirely sure if this is something he would do or not. HardCoreBlue, Tracker, JCon and 1 other 2 2
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 True or not it's funny as hell. Bravo.
17to85 Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 49 minutes ago, pigseye said: It's about the lawyers,especially Rudy, not the circumstantial evidence, try to keep up. No it's not. Rudy has been making an ass of himself trying to defend Trump for a long time now. Trying to shift focus onto how useless he is is just more of the distraction technique from the alt-right. The point is and always has been, where is the evidence that the election was stolen.
TrueBlue4ever Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 4 minutes ago, Rich said: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-quit-costco-letter/ One of the problems with Trump, is you never are really entirely sure if this is something he would do or not. Thank you for the correction.
bustamente Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Does anyone really believe that Trump has a Costco card and if he did does he use his ID when he buys cereal
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Just now, 17to85 said: No it's not. Rudy has been making an ass of himself trying to defend Trump for a long time now. Trying to shift focus onto how useless he is is just more of the distraction technique from the alt-right. The point is and always has been, where is the evidence that the election You don't understand and I'm not going to explain it to you. Read the link if you want to know what happened.
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 9 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Where is the evidence? The only evidence was circumstantial which is why Rudy had try to make a case out of a couple hundred dead people voting. But hey at 20 grand a day why not. Probably why he was juiced every day.
Mark H. Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 3 hours ago, pigseye said: You don't understand and I'm not going to explain it to you. Read the link if you want to know what happened. The link shows that there really wasn’t any evidence. blue_gold_84 1
do or die Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 44 minutes ago, Mark H. said: The link shows that there really wasn’t any evidence. I understand...
17to85 Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 10 hours ago, pigseye said: The only evidence was circumstantial which is why Rudy had try to make a case out of a couple hundred dead people voting. But hey at 20 grand a day why not. Probably why he was juiced every day. Aka it was all bullshit?
bustamente Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 According to Republicans lying is protected free speech, next inciting violence is a right to stay in power, lets just forget the whole thing until the next time
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 1 hour ago, 17to85 said: Aka it was all bullshit? Of course it was all bullshit.
Mark F Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 (edited) 14 hours ago, Rich said: One of the problems with Trump, is you never are really entirely sure if this is something he would do or Trump is not capable of composing a letter of that length. 1 hour ago, bustamente said: According to Republicans lying is protected free speech, next inciting violence is a right to stay in power, lets just forget the whole thing until the next time There was a court decision in the states ten or so years ago, that there is no legal obligation to be truthful in advertising. can not find it to post here. they have some very odd law in the States. Edited February 8, 2021 by Mark F Tracker 1
Mark F Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Third, the demographic profile of the suspected Capitol rioters is different from that of past right-wing extremists. The average age of the arrestees we studied is 40. Two-thirds are 35 or older, and 40 percent are business owners or hold white-collar jobs. Unlike the stereotypical extremist, many of the alleged participants in the Capitol riot have a lot to lose. They work as CEOs, shop owners, doctors, lawyers, IT specialists, and accountants. Strikingly, court documents indicate that only 9 percent are unemployed. Of the earlier far-right-extremist suspects we studied, 61 percent were under 35, 25 percent were unemployed, and almost none worked in white-collar occupations. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/the-capitol-rioters-arent-like-other-extremists/617895/ Wanna-B-Fanboy, HardCoreBlue and blue_gold_84 1 2
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 10 minutes ago, Mark F said: Third, the demographic profile of the suspected Capitol rioters is different from that of past right-wing extremists. The average age of the arrestees we studied is 40. Two-thirds are 35 or older, and 40 percent are business owners or hold white-collar jobs. Unlike the stereotypical extremist, many of the alleged participants in the Capitol riot have a lot to lose. They work as CEOs, shop owners, doctors, lawyers, IT specialists, and accountants. Strikingly, court documents indicate that only 9 percent are unemployed. Of the earlier far-right-extremist suspects we studied, 61 percent were under 35, 25 percent were unemployed, and almost none worked in white-collar occupations. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/the-capitol-rioters-arent-like-other-extremists/617895/ Sounds like fantasy to me, everyone knows that Trump supporters are uneducated red necks.
bustamente Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Mark F, Tracker, Wideleft and 1 other 1 3
bustamente Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 We all know how Senator impeachment trial will go, the evidence is damming, yet more Republican Senators will set precedence and will vote to acquit and will have their names forever associated with the worst POTUS in the history of the United States who lied about the results tried to change the election by trying to strong arm officials and when that didn't work lathered his crazed rubes to storm the Capitol looking for blood. After this vote Democrats should first get rid of the filibuster and then ram thru their agenda and pretend like the Republicans don't exist make them irrelevant. JCon 1
pigseye Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 Pot meet kettle N.Y. Rep. Brindisi concedes to Republican Claudia Tenney, ending country’s last open congressional race (msn.com) Quote Still, Brindisi issued a bitter lament about what he called a ballot-counting process “riddled with errors, inconsistencies and systematic violations of state and federal laws.”
Tracker Posted February 8, 2021 Report Posted February 8, 2021 18 minutes ago, bustamente said: We all know how Senator impeachment trial will go, the evidence is damming, yet more Republican Senators will set precedence and will vote to acquit and will have their names forever associated with the worst POTUS in the history of the United States who lied about the results tried to change the election by trying to strong arm officials and when that didn't work lathered his crazed rubes to storm the Capitol looking for blood. After this vote Democrats should first get rid of the filibuster and then ram thru their agenda and pretend like the Republicans don't exist make them irrelevant. There is a downside to the Democrats steamrolling the GOP. The GOP and their adherents have been wringing their hands and crying that they have been victimized for decades, even during the Trump ascendancy. They now can amplify their jeremiads and this will likely provoke their rabid followers to even more violence.
do or die Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 6 hours ago, Tracker said: There is a downside to the Democrats steamrolling the GOP. The GOP and their adherents have been wringing their hands and crying that they have been victimized for decades, even during the Trump ascendancy. They now can amplify their jeremiads and this will likely provoke their rabid followers to even more violence. Still beats having the previous President and his administration crapping all over every known democratic norm, though,......
Mark H. Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 I don’t this is going to happen: a) The Republicans won’t vote for it. b) The U.S. constitution has no provisions for impeaching a president, once he’s out of office.
TrueBlue4ever Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mark H. said: I don’t this is going to happen: a) The Republicans won’t vote for it. b) The U.S. constitution has no provisions for impeaching a president, once he’s out of office. Here is an article about the provisions of the Constitution about impeachment and the precedent for impeaching someone out of office. And as a matter of logic, every single outgoing President between losing the election and Inauguration Day could essentially break the law with reckless abandon and fear no consequence if impeachment were not allowed for someone out of office. That defies all common sense. https://www.justsecurity.org/74226/history-shows-the-senate-can-hold-an-impeachment-trial-after-trump-leaves-office/ Edited February 9, 2021 by TrueBlue4ever bustamente, Tracker, JCon and 1 other 4
Tracker Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 Republicans defend Trump ahead of impeachment trial by blaming Nancy Pelosi for Capitol riot GOP shifts blame to Democrats for Capitol riot, call impeachment a “diversionary operation” As Donald Trump's second impeachment trial looms near, bringing the former president's incitement of insurrection into greater focus once again, members of the GOP are –– in another ambitious act of baseless conspiracy –– deflecting blame onto their Democratic counterparts for the riot and framing impeachment as a "diversionary operation" meant to distract from Democratic culpability. The idea that Democrats, who were chiefly targeted by rioters themselves, are responsible for the riot, is not entirely novel. Shortly after the Jan. 6 riot, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-SC, tried to put House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, under scrutiny, asking in an interview with Fox News, "Where was Nancy Pelosi? It's her job to provide Capitol security." A month later, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Senator Ron Johnson, R-WI, are now taking Graham's cue, leading the charge to position their Democratic colleagues as enablers of the insurrection. Republicans defend Trump ahead of impeachment trial by blaming Nancy Pelosi for Capitol riot | Salon.com blue_gold_84, Mark F, bustamente and 1 other 4
Recommended Posts