Atomic Posted June 14, 2017 Report Posted June 14, 2017 1 hour ago, The Unknown Poster said: Im surprised because the president told us we didnt have to worry about guns since bad guys used knives and cars. Actually the argument is that guns are dangerous but in the absence of guns people will still find a way, using knives and cars. With guns present there is no need to use knives or cars.
The Unknown Poster Posted June 14, 2017 Report Posted June 14, 2017 9 minutes ago, Atomic said: Actually the argument is that guns are dangerous but in the absence of guns people will still find a way, using knives and cars. With guns present there is no need to use knives or cars. I was being sarcastic...
Atomic Posted June 14, 2017 Report Posted June 14, 2017 Just now, The Unknown Poster said: I was being sarcastic... I know. The Unknown Poster 1
Wideleft Posted June 14, 2017 Report Posted June 14, 2017 3 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Are we really surprised about the shooting in Virginia this morning??? Not when you consider how many mass shootings have already occurred in the U.S. this year. Today's shootings in #Alexandria & San Francisco bring the total # of mass shootings in 2017 to 195. -958 victims -675 injured -283 killed Mark F 1
Mark F Posted June 14, 2017 Report Posted June 14, 2017 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Wideleft said: Not when you consider how many mass shootings have already occurred in the U.S. this year. Today's shootings in #Alexandria & San Francisco bring the total # of mass shootings in 2017 to 195. -958 victims -675 injured -283 killed Met some people in Washington state, who told me about this incident. Their son was involved in an argument in a grocery store checkout line. a few minutes later, as their son drove off from the store, the other party sprayed their sons car with bullets, with some sort of automatic weapon. Gun was most likely legally purchased, legally carried into and around the grocery store, and legally taken out on the street, where it was used in an attempt to murder someone, over a disagreement in a grocery store checkout line. If the son was killed, gun owners see that as worth it. unfortunate, but necessary price. you need a license to drive, probably can't get a driver's license if you are mentally ill,, can't drink till your 21, but anyone can pack a gun. Glad we don't have a major gun manufacturing lobby in this country. Edited June 14, 2017 by Mark F SPuDS and Wideleft 2
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 trump "leaked" that he was considering firing the special counsel. Well Mueller trumped Trumped by revealing he is actively investigating Trump now And you just know Trump will want to fire him anyway in a near copy of the Saturday night massacre that led to Nixon's downfall. Wideleft 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 People weren't as gullible in 1973. Trump's base, Breitbart & Fox News will just say it's fake & that everything will be okay.
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 7 hours ago, Mark F said: Met some people in Washington state, who told me about this incident. Their son was involved in an argument in a grocery store checkout line. a few minutes later, as their son drove off from the store, the other party sprayed their sons car with bullets, with some sort of automatic weapon. Gun was most likely legally purchased, legally carried into and around the grocery store, and legally taken out on the street, where it was used in an attempt to murder someone, over a disagreement in a grocery store checkout line. If the son was killed, gun owners see that as worth it. unfortunate, but necessary price. you need a license to drive, probably can't get a driver's license if you are mentally ill,, can't drink till your 21, but anyone can pack a gun. Glad we don't have a major gun manufacturing lobby in this country. Come on. The problem isn't the guy with the legal assault rifle. That's his right. The problem is the victims didn't also have weapons to shoot back. I think that was an episode of Star Trek actually. Arm both sides. More guns is the answer! FrostyWinnipeg and Mark F 2
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 People die every day. Whether from guns or otherwise. The important part is that people are free to do as they please, and that's what makes America better than any country on Earth. True freedom, although the socialist left attempts to erode it constantly. It's sad really. If people want to live a libertarian lifestyle and accept the risks that come with it, why do socialists always want to take that away?
JCon Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 11 minutes ago, Atomic said: People die every day. Whether from guns or otherwise. The important part is that people are free to do as they please, and that's what makes America better than any country on Earth. True freedom, although the socialist left attempts to erode it constantly. It's sad really. If people want to live a libertarian lifestyle and accept the risks that come with it, why do socialists always want to take that away? Freedom to die at someone else's hand because proper controls are not in place is not the "freedom" I want. I want freedom from nut jobs with guns. That's not socialism. SPuDS and blue_gold_84 2
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, JCon said: Freedom to die at someone else's hand because proper controls are not in place is not the "freedom" I want. I want freedom from nut jobs with guns. That's not socialism. There's lots of countries where you can have exactly that. Why can't there be a place for the people who just want their freedom?
JCon Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, Atomic said: There's lots of countries where you can have exactly that. Why can't there be a place for the people who just want their freedom? There can and that can be the US. But you can't call it free country if you're going limit others freedoms. Also, we can't easily emigrate to other countries.
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, JCon said: There can and that can be the US. But you can't call it free country if you're going limit others freedoms. Also, we can't easily emigrate to other countries. That's exactly what you do when you take my tax money and distribute it to whomever rather than letting me decide what I want to do with it. Because let me tell you, if I had the choice I wouldn't be giving up half my paycheque to foreign aid for people in China or building gender-neutral washrooms at the legislature.
HardCoreBlue Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, Atomic said: There's lots of countries where you can have exactly that. Why can't there be a place for the people who just want their freedom? Too simple. The complexity here is freedom to do what? It will vary among us Human Beings and that's what gets us into a pickle at times. Some people are more equipped than others when it comes to self-regulation.
JCon Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 15 minutes ago, Atomic said: That's exactly what you do when you take my tax money and distribute it to whomever rather than letting me decide what I want to do with it. Because let me tell you, if I had the choice I wouldn't be giving up half my paycheque to foreign aid for people in China or building gender-neutral washrooms at the legislature. You don't. I assure you, very little of your paycheque goes to that. I would bet that most of your paycheque goes back to you through infrastructure and services. Wanna-B-Fanboy and blue_gold_84 2
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 We should be free to shoot people if we want to! If I cant kill someone then am I really free? Its interesting hearing how "rattled" Congress is. How they are taking this as a personal attack on all of them. I hope they spend some time with parents of kids killed at school or the survivors who were traumatized and they can commiserate together about it. There is simply no reason whatsoever for people to have free access to weapons like this. JCon 1
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 Republicans that still don't get it setting up Trump's witch hunt claims to discredit Mueller I believe Newt was fine with a special counsel probing Clinton's sex life though
blue_gold_84 Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 Newt Gingrich is an idiot. bustamente, Mark F, The Unknown Poster and 1 other 4
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 Does this clown not realize that his ridiculous hyperbole and baseless attacks only serve to undermine the credibility of the republicans?
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: Does this clown not realize that his ridiculous hyperbole and baseless attacks only serve to undermine the credibility of the republicans? If you think that any of that matters, you aren't paying attention. Republican supporters agree with him. This only makes Republicans look bad in the eyes of Democrats.... and do any Repubs actually care what Dem supporters think? The lines are drawn. It doesn't matter who says what on either side. Facts are meaningless. People have chosen their side and they're not changing now.
The Unknown Poster Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 I think its telling in the sense that it likely means whatever has been leaked among the power brokers about what Mueller has and what he's pursuing is scaring the hell out of Trump and his pals. For them to be on this much of an offensive against a special consul they all applauded a month ago is something. They should also be cognizant of history. Trump is mirroring Nixon in many ways. It wasn't Nixon's crimes that did him in, it was the cover up, especially when he tried to obstruct the special consul. I suspect things will get even wilder, especially if there is any sense the Dems might take control in the mid-terms. If they do, its house-cleaning time and the far right wont allow that and their wussy "moderates" who would rather keep power than morals will go along with it.
Mark F Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 I now worry about Trump becoming so desperate that he pulls off something really horrific, to avoid exposure of the truth about him. Together with his deep ignorance, and failure to understand the most basic things. nuclear launch for instance. He already said he didn't see why they can't be used. JCon 1
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Mark F said: I now worry about Trump becoming so desperate that he pulls off something really horrific, to avoid exposure of the truth about him. Together with his deep ignorance, and failure to understand the most basic things. nuclear launch for instance. He already said he didn't see why they can't be used. I'm more worried about Democratic supporters doing something insane like going out and shooting Republican congressmen
Mark F Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Atomic said: I'm more worried about Democratic supporters doing something insane like going out and shooting Republican congressmen tell me then, What's stopping Trump from a nuclear launch?
Atomic Posted June 15, 2017 Report Posted June 15, 2017 11 minutes ago, Mark F said: tell me then, What's stopping Trump from a nuclear launch? Same **** that stopped every other president so far. If you actually think he's going to launch a nuke, you're just buying into democrat/liberal hysteria. It's not going to happen.
Recommended Posts