The Unknown Poster Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 Just now, JCon said: Myers is worth more than Dano and Petan (or some 2nd round draft pick). If the Jets can't protect Myers, it's going to be expensive to for them to get Vegas to take anyone else. Maybe too expensive... Thats why its better to get Toby to waive because he's probably not super desirable for Vegas. But Vegas isnt going to win this year so getting assets is important too. If they get ONE asset from Winnipeg and it's Lowry or Perrault, thats good. Not spectacular but pretty darn good. If the Jets make moves to protect more forwards and the end result is offering Vegas a deal to take Dano, Petan and a draft pick, that's potentially better than Myers if the intent is to not let Myers be exposed anyway.
bb1 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said: That could be true. But Fleury did specifically say one of the reasons he waived was because it was the right thing to do for the Pens. I want Toby to put the Jets first too. But he has zero obligation to do so. He was given a contract. He's abiding by that contract. If he waives, its a favour he's doing for the Jets. If he over-performed we would not expect the Jets to give him a raise mid-contract. Yet how many players hold out when they do have a break out season.....Enstrom had a brutal year last year and wasn't great the year before...give back a little...no way Vegas takes him at 5 million...its not a big gamble for him??but would help the Jets who have stood by him the last couple of mediocre to brutal years.... Edited June 16, 2017 by bb1
Atomic Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 13 minutes ago, bb1 said: Yet how many players hold out when they do have a break out season.....Enstrom had a brutal year last year and wasn't great the year before...give back a little...no way Vegas takes him at 5 million...its not a big gamble for him??but would help the Jets who have stood by him the last couple of mediocre to brutal years.... For that to make sense, Toby would have to agree that he has been mediocre to brutal. Do you think that he feels that way?
bb1 Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Atomic said: For that to make sense, Toby would have to agree that he has been mediocre to brutal. Do you think that he feels that way? Do you think he would say he has had a great last 2 years?
Atomic Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 16 minutes ago, bb1 said: Do you think he would say he has had a great last 2 years? Yes probably. I would at least expect him to believe he has earned his salary.
FrostyWinnipeg Posted June 16, 2017 Report Posted June 16, 2017 (edited) 29 minutes ago, bb1 said: Do you think he would say he has had a great last 2 years? He had a great 15-16 imho...+8 Edited June 16, 2017 by FrostyWinnipeg
bb1 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 1 hour ago, Atomic said: Yes probably. I would at least expect him to believe he has earned his salary. Sad statement but probably true..
Atomic Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 So glad they decided they are going to release the protected lists. Goalie 1
Goalie Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 blue_gold_84, sweep the leg, Jimmy Pop and 5 others 8
bb1 Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 47 minutes ago, Goalie said: Good on Enstrom...was the right thing to do.☺
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 If they ever want GM's to make news just institute a movement freeze. They all go nuts and blow their brains out for a few hours and then see what their teams are left with.
bustamente Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 (edited) Enstroms agent say's he like's it in Winnipeg does not want to go to Vegas Edited June 17, 2017 by bustamente
The Unknown Poster Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 Toby doing that when he has zero reason to do so (other then some odd desire to go to Vegas) is a major character move. kelownabomberfan, Noeller, blue_gold_84 and 3 others 6
FrostyWinnipeg Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: Toby doing that when he has zero reason to do so (other then some odd desire to go to Vegas) is a major character move. Could also mean the Jets made deal with Vegas they dont draft Toby and they make odd trade like Vegas's 9th rounder for a 3rd rounder. Also just for clarification, no team can make trade for someone Vegas just took from them? Edited June 17, 2017 by FrostyWinnipeg
iHeart Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 so would this mean Enstrom is staying and Dano is going?
FrostyWinnipeg Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, iHeart said: so would this mean Enstrom is staying and Dano is going? Unless they want Matthias or Stuart.
The Unknown Poster Posted June 17, 2017 Report Posted June 17, 2017 Vegas wants picks. And is willing to negotiate a deal to let every team keep the players they want.
FrostyWinnipeg Posted June 18, 2017 Report Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) 32 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: Vegas wants picks. And is willing to negotiate a deal to let every team keep the players they want. Okay but they need 22/23 with the club and 8-10 for the A. They need that many guys and so far they have 2. Edited June 18, 2017 by FrostyWinnipeg
The Unknown Poster Posted June 18, 2017 Report Posted June 18, 2017 I imagine they will sign a lot of free agents.
JCon Posted June 18, 2017 Report Posted June 18, 2017 3 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Okay but they need 22/23 with the club and 8-10 for the A. They need that many guys and so far they have 2. They're still going to pick 30 players but they're giving the teams a chance to hold onto that one guy they couldn't fit into 7-3-1 or 4-4-1. sweep the leg, bustamente and Goalie 3
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 18, 2017 Report Posted June 18, 2017 That statement is bizarre. sweep the leg 1
sweep the leg Posted June 18, 2017 Report Posted June 18, 2017 41 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: That statement is bizarre. Agreed. I'm not sure what the point is.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now