Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The reason they sent Tanev down was because Matthias and Armia came back. I'd rather see him on the Jets. Makes me wonder why they are keeping that spot open if Myers isn't going to play though.

Posted
6 minutes ago, bustamente said:

Think Stafford can see that he just doesn't fit on this team anymore, suspect at the deadline he will elsewhere for whatever the Jets can get back, which won't be much. 

Not as much as Stempy for sure.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Goalie said:

Why not let Tanev develop in the A for a bit and just play Thor instead of Stafford 

Agreed on Tanev think that Connor gets next call up, Thor might play against Buffalo they are physical team and he's been sharpening up his fighting skills ;)

Posted

Another win with all forwards playing under 20 minutes.

Chiarot playing almost 3 minutes more than Postma.

Lotsa good games out there and Scheif is looking better the last two games, isn't he?

Little was strong, Laine takes the goal and points scoring lead for rookies and Matthias continues to be the hottest goal scorer on the Jets. I read some crazy stats on him yesterday.

You're right. I'd rather see Connor called up as well. Thing is, where do you put him? Connor Petan and Copp?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ducky said:

Another win with all forwards playing under 20 minutes.

Chiarot playing almost 3 minutes more than Postma.

Lotsa good games out there and Scheif is looking better the last two games, isn't he?

Little was strong, Laine takes the goal and points scoring lead for rookies and Matthias continues to be the hottest goal scorer on the Jets. I read some crazy stats on him yesterday.

You're right. I'd rather see Connor called up as well. Thing is, where do you put him? Connor Petan and Copp?

Chariot does pk duty, Scheif does look better but his line mates are something special, as for Connor he needs to play top six but i dont think he is ready for that yet maybe next year. If they call him up he will get 4th line minutes unless Matty P get injured. 

Posted

4th line doesn't get much ice and have actually been pretty lackluster the last couple of games when they do get ice. 

I think at this point I'd sit Stafford... took a really lazy penalty late last night in the Tampa zone away way away from the play and play thorburn 

I'd strongly consider sending 1 ot both of petan and Copp down to Manitoba and bringing up Howden and someone else cuz I honestly don't see how playing 4th line minutes is good for 2 young guys who still could be developing and playing a lot more minutes with Manitoba 

Posted

I thought you said the other day Tanev was a perfect 4th line player and Thorbs didn't belong in the NHL?

I'd play Tanev WAY before Thorbs but that's me. Knowing Maurice, Staf will get 8-9 minutes of 4th line time and drag that line down. I wonder if he plays better against his old team? I'd love to see Armia get a couple of goals and against his old team is a good place to start.

Posted

I just don't think I want Thorbs on the ice unless it is absolutely necessary. We have a healthy enough roster that it isn't necessary. Tanev has averaged 12 minutes a game and deserves and needs the ice time more than Thorbs but I don't think either is going to sway the outcome of a game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...