Atomic Posted October 13, 2017 Report Posted October 13, 2017 Well you know the old saying, Liberals are entitled to their entitlements
blue_gold_84 Posted October 17, 2017 Report Posted October 17, 2017 Nenshi re-elected as Mayor of Calgary: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-election-2017-results-victor-1.4357873 Wideleft and StevetheClub 2
The Unknown Poster Posted October 17, 2017 Author Report Posted October 17, 2017 5 hours ago, blue_gold_84 said: Nenshi re-elected as Mayor of Calgary: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-election-2017-results-victor-1.4357873 Part of me is glad because the efforts of the Calgary Flames were really inappropriate in my mind. sweep the leg, FrostyWinnipeg, blue_gold_84 and 3 others 6
blue_gold_84 Posted October 19, 2017 Report Posted October 19, 2017 http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/morneau-tax-reform-farmers-fishers-1.4361746 Quote Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau is climbing down from another controversial tax proposal to address the concerns of farmers and fishers. Morneau said the government is abandoning the proposed tax reform that would have restricted the conversion of income into capital gains. "We're going to take a step back and reconsider that aspect of our tax proposal," he said.
Wideleft Posted October 20, 2017 Report Posted October 20, 2017 On 10/19/2017 at 11:54 AM, blue_gold_84 said: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/morneau-tax-reform-farmers-fishers-1.4361746 This only makes sense. They clearly didn't see the implications that it would cost more to sell to your own family than to a complete stranger. I do think there has to be a "happy" medium here, though. First of all, the "traditional" (unincorporated) farm wouldn't have been effected by these changes at all - so we are generally talking about some pretty wealthy (in terms of capital, land and possibly income) farm operations. While it shouldn't cost more to hand the farm down, it shouldn't be tax-free either. A fair middle ground would be to exempt "heritage" land. By that I mean land that was owned by the family when the following generation reached a certain age, or even when they were born. As it stands, an old, wealthy incorporated farmer could go on a land-buying binge right before he "sells" the land to his kid(s) and we'd all be subsidizing the cost of his new fleet of 500K combines with the taxes he avoids.
The Unknown Poster Posted January 26, 2018 Author Report Posted January 26, 2018 Ah yes. This thread. blue_gold_84 1
Mark H. Posted January 26, 2018 Report Posted January 26, 2018 A.K.A give them a majority and let do what they want. Lather, rinse, repeat.
17to85 Posted January 26, 2018 Report Posted January 26, 2018 Liberals acting like Liberals, well I for one am shocked, no one could have predicted this!
Atomic Posted January 26, 2018 Report Posted January 26, 2018 http://calgaryherald.com/news/politics/provincial-liberals-harassment-investigation-under-wraps https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-kent-hehr-resigns-over-sexual-harassment-allegations/article37733581/ http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-davos-costs-trump-1.4503355 Bad behaviour by Liberals getting exposed on a daily basis
FrostyWinnipeg Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-announcement-etobicoke-ontario-pc-leader-1.4508622
do or die Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 I know it can be boring, but anyone ever watch Justin speaking in the House. What a empty vessel. rebusrankin 1
FrostyWinnipeg Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 Just now, do or die said: I know it can be boring, but anyone ever watch Justin speaking in the House. What a empty vessel. Reminds me of Paul Martin in that he's not a great speaker but can't beat those ratings. Guaranteed for another win. Then Scheer gets tossed and Maxime takes the next one.
do or die Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 At least we get a platitude for every pot....
Mark F Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) Thing I don't understand about Justin is why Albertans hate him. He's given them (or tried to) everything Harper gave. Quote Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau received an unusually warm reception of his keynote address at an energy industry conference in Texas on Thursday evening. "No country would find 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground and just leave them there," Trudeau said in his address to oil and gas industry executives at Houston's CERAWeek conference, discussing Alberta's vast oil sands reserves. Trudeau's speech was met with a standing ovation from the more than 1,200 attendees — an unordinary reaction to a keynote speaker, conference-goers told the CBC Edited January 29, 2018 by Mark F
17to85 Posted January 29, 2018 Report Posted January 29, 2018 3 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Reminds me of Paul Martin in that he's not a great speaker but can't beat those ratings. Guaranteed for another win. Then Scheer gets tossed and Maxime takes the next one. Oh god please no.
johnzo Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 Bill to replace "in all thy Son's command" with "in all of us command" in O Canada passes the Senate, just needs royal assent. This oughta cause some fireworks.
SPuDS Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 5 minutes ago, johnzo said: Bill to replace "in all thy Son's command" with "in all of us command" in O Canada passes the Senate, just needs royal assent. This oughta cause some fireworks. so dumb.
blue_gold_84 Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, johnzo said: Bill to replace "in all thy Son's command" with "in all of us command" in O Canada passes the Senate, just needs royal assent. This oughta cause some fireworks. Oh, I'm sure that's already the case. This is not without a ton of controversy.
The Unknown Poster Posted February 1, 2018 Author Report Posted February 1, 2018 My initial reaction was "really? This is important?" However, the original lyrics were: "thou dost in us command" It was changed in 1908. I saw it noted somewhere the change was to appeal to young men going to war. This change simply reverts it back to the original (with modern language) and removes a change that was made specifically for gender reasons. Im perfectly fine with it now. FrostyWinnipeg, Brandon Blue&Gold and blue_gold_84 2 1
FrostyWinnipeg Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 35 minutes ago, johnzo said: This oughta cause some fireworks. I'm good with it, now get the religious figures out.
johnzo Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 It's interesting that the change of a religious bit is being portrayed as a gender change instead of a religious change.
johnzo Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 (tho I guess "thy sons" is meant to be "Canada's sons" instead of Jesus. Learn a new thing every day.) JCon and The Unknown Poster 2
JCon Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 1 hour ago, johnzo said: (tho I guess "thy sons" is meant to be "Canada's sons" instead of Jesus. Learn a new thing every day.) Interesting take. So, you saw the national anthem as being song to God? God was the audience? I've always seen the national anthem being sung one-another.
johnzo Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 I always understood "in all thy Son's command" to mean that the country was in obedience to Christ. But all the other references to thee and thou in the song are clearly about Canada and not about God. Six year old me saw "thy Son" and also "see thee rise" and figured biblically loaded language meant biblical intent, and then I just didn't think about it for forty years, until today. JCon 1
JCon Posted February 1, 2018 Report Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, johnzo said: I always understood "in all thy Son's command" to mean that the country was in obedience to Christ. But all the other references to thee and thou in the song are clearly about Canada and not about God. Six year old me saw "thy Son" and also "see thee rise" and figured biblically loaded language meant biblical intent, and then I just didn't think about it for forty years, until today. That's cool. I think my view was shaped by French immersion. The anthem is sung to the country (as if it were a person) or at least that's how I interpreted it. Here are the French lyrics, translated to English (from Wikipedia): O Canada! Land of our ancestors Glorious deeds circle your brow For your arm knows how to wield the sword Your arm knows how to carry the cross; Your history is an epic Of brilliant deeds And your valour steeped in faith Will protect our homes and our rights, Will protect our homes and our rights. blue_gold_84 1
Recommended Posts