Canadian Politics

[Tracker]

14 hours ago, Tracker said:

Sorry- cannot recall but will look for that tomorrow.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/vern-white-nsicop-china-poilievre-1.6774671

[Mark H.]

3 hours ago, Tracker said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/vern-white-nsicop-china-poilievre-1.6774671

Ok, so it was a senator.  I couldn't quite imagine a currently sitting MP calling out their leader. 

That's an excellent article - maybe someone could read it to Pollievere

[HardCoreBlue]

27 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

Ok, so it was a senator.  I couldn't quite imagine a currently sitting MP calling out their leader. 

That's an excellent article - maybe someone could read it to Pollievere

That wouldn't make a lick of difference in the current environment he continues to fuel.

It's no match for soundbites, half-truths, lies that fuel angertainment.

[Mark H.]

39 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

That wouldn't make a lick of difference in the current environment he continues to fuel.

It's no match for soundbites, half-truths, lies that fuel angertainment.

I am just surprised to hear similar rhetoric from Singh and the NDP (public inquiry, cover up, blah, blah, blah)

Their points in QP are not much different from the Conservative talking points

And yes, both parties must be aware that QP is not a place where such questions can legally be answered

 

[Mark H.]

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/03/14/poilievre-lawsuit-big-pharma-opioid-crisis/

Pollievere plans on being a very busy PM

Latest: he's going to sue Big Pharma, in order to raise funds - which HE will use to fight the opiod crisis

I mean, he could save time and just start the lawsuit immediately (sarcasm)

 

[blue_gold_84]

5 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/03/14/poilievre-lawsuit-big-pharma-opioid-crisis/

Pollievere plans on being a very busy PM

Latest: he's going to sue Big Pharma, in order to raise funds - which HE will use to fight the opiod crisis

I mean, he could save time and just start the lawsuit immediately (sarcasm)

 

He's nothing more than a manufactured outrage mouthpiece at this point.

The whiny posterchild of conservativism* in this country.

* not even sure what that is or stands for anymore

[Wanna-B-Fanboy]

44 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/03/14/poilievre-lawsuit-big-pharma-opioid-crisis/

Pollievere plans on being a very busy PM

Latest: he's going to sue Big Pharma, in order to raise funds - which HE will use to fight the opiod crisis

I mean, he could save time and just start the lawsuit immediately (sarcasm)

 

The best part of that strategy- we say buh-bye to our low cost pharmaceuticals.  

[WildPath]

4 hours ago, blue_gold_84 said:

He's nothing more than a manufactured outrage mouthpiece at this point.

The whiny posterchild of conservativism* in this country.

* not even sure what that is or stands for anymore

 

Quote

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Tuesday the Liberal government's inaction on alleged election meddling by China has some Canadian voters wondering whether recent election results can be trusted.

Trudeau has 'inspired a lot of suspicion' about election results, Poilievre says | CBC News

Yup, you got it. Alluding to the idea that the election was fraudulent and the wrong party is in power. I've seen this show somewhere before. I wonder if he'll play the Trump card if the next election doesn't go his way.

[blue_gold_84]

To the surprise of no one.

[Wideleft]

28 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said:

To the surprise of no one.

The Cult of Moe defies explanation.  Must be his extraordinary charisma.

[Noeller]

25 minutes ago, Wideleft said:

The Cult of Moe defies explanation.  Must be his extraordinary charisma.

Every time I see a list like this and how high he is ON that list......it just tells me so much about the population of Saskatchewan. They really are just garbage. 

[HardCoreBlue]

1 minute ago, Noeller said:

Every time I see a list like this and how high he is ON that list......it just tells me so much about the population of Saskatchewan. They really are just garbage. 

Living in Alberta eyeing that 46% I don't think we can talk to loudly about people who populate the never was province.

[Noeller]

4 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Living in Alberta eyeing that 46% I don't think we can talk to loudly about people who populate the never was province.

hey man - at least you get to live up around Edmonton where things are relatively sane...... I'm out in the boonies where **** gets WEIRD. On my way in to work today there was a jacked up rig-truck with the usual stickers across the back window and two huge Alberta flags on hockey sticks flying in the bed..... still......in 2023........sigh. 

But yes, rural AB and all of Sask are just the absolute worst....

[blue_gold_84]

8 minutes ago, Noeller said:

hey man - at least you get to live up around Edmonton where things are relatively sane...... I'm out in the boonies where **** gets WEIRD. On my way in to work today there was a jacked up rig-truck with the usual stickers across the back window and two huge Alberta flags on hockey sticks flying in the bed..... still......in 2023........sigh. 

But yes, rural AB and all of Sask are just the absolute worst....

You got to see a free-thinking, pureblood, patriot freedom fighter in real life...?!

[17to85]

50 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Living in Alberta eyeing that 46% I don't think we can talk to loudly about people who populate the never was province.

How the hell is she at 46%? Everything she's done has been immediately followed up with either a retraction or "clarification " about how she didn't really mean that stupid **** she totally meant but was unpopular. 

 

 

People are ******* morons.

[Brandon]

1 hour ago, Noeller said:

Every time I see a list like this and how high he is ON that list......it just tells me so much about the population of Saskatchewan. They really are just garbage. 

I have no opinion on the person but have you ever considered that if the majority of people disagrees with what you feel that you may be the one in the wrong?  

[Noeller]

sigh.......

 

[MOBomberFan]

1 hour ago, Brandon said:

I have no opinion on the person but have you ever considered that if the majority of people disagrees with what you feel that you may be the one in the wrong?  

So if enough people feel strongly enough about something it is right? That makes for a fun stroll through history

[Wanna-B-Fanboy]

1 hour ago, Brandon said:

I have no opinion on the person but have you ever considered that if the majority of people disagrees with what you feel that you may be the one in the wrong?  

 

 

 

I swear, you MUST be trolling at this point...

[HardCoreBlue]

3 minutes ago, Noeller said:

sigh.......

 

 

2 hours ago, 17to85 said:

How the hell is she at 46%? Everything she's done has been immediately followed up with either a retraction or "clarification " about how she didn't really mean that stupid **** she totally meant but was unpopular. 

 

 

People are ******* morons.

For some, she emulates who they are as people.

For some its not about them being stupid or gullible, it's about 'I'm wired the same way, I like you'.

That's more scary and depressing to me than simply being dumb and ignorant.

[SpeedFlex27]

12 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

 

For some, she emulates who they are as people.

For some its not about them being stupid or gullible, it's about 'I'm wired the same way, I like you'.

That's more scary and depressing to me than simply being dumb and ignorant.

People would rather have Danielle Smith than Rachel Notley answering to Jagmeet Singh who would be calling the shots. Simple as that. The NDP in Alberta take their marching orders from the Champagne Socialist Singh at the HO in Ottawa. 

[HardCoreBlue]

2 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

People would rather have Danielle Smith than Rachel Notley answering to Jagmeet Singh who would be calling the shots. Simple as that. The NDP in Alberta take their marching orders from the Champagne Socialist Singh at the HO in Ottawa. 

Unpack that for me.

[Mark H.]

5 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

People would rather have Danielle Smith than Rachel Notley answering to Jagmeet Singh who would be calling the shots. Simple as that. The NDP in Alberta take their marching orders from the Champagne Socialist Singh at the HO in Ottawa. 

I am curious about this.  I see few similarities between Singh's school of thought (I hear plenty of it in QP) and the way provincial NDP governments do business.  

 

[Noeller]

11 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

People would rather have Danielle Smith than Rachel Notley answering to Jagmeet Singh who would be calling the shots. Simple as that. The NDP in Alberta take their marching orders from the Champagne Socialist Singh at the HO in Ottawa. 

this is completely insane and perfect encapsulates why people vote for the UCP.......good......lord. 

[17to85]

30 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said:

People would rather have Danielle Smith than Rachel Notley answering to Jagmeet Singh who would be calling the shots. Simple as that. The NDP in Alberta take their marching orders from the Champagne Socialist Singh at the HO in Ottawa. 

It wasn't that long ago you were bitching about the UCP and got mad that I pointed a finger at you for electing them... why the change of heart? Danielle Smith is many times more dangerous than Jason Kenney was so why support a batshit insane lobbyist? 

Also get ****** with the talking points about Singh. Notley is the least NDP ndp leader in this country. 

God people like you make me sick. You recognize the damage these conservative whack jobs do but then forget all about it because of their stupid commercials.