Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, mbrg said:

Serious answer.  We went 11-7 last season.  It's February 14th already.  What do you think?

 

(maybe if Steinauer hadn't gone south, but he did)

I think what you're saying is this would be an very hurtful day to break up with a coach...

Posted (edited)

I know it shouldn't surprise me anymore, but too many people in this thread fail to understand

a) There is a salary cap, and

b)We can't force players to sign here.

 

Edited by yogi
Posted
7 minutes ago, Atomic said:

Who is signing players in Toronto?  The COO or President or something?

One of the fry-cooks from Wendy's.  They run this league now.

Posted

Just love it...this following a quote from Dennis saying "TO have the chance to compete for a Grey Cup this year and next, Saskatchewan just made sense"....................................................lol.

Posted
Just now, Noeller said:

Just love it...this following a quote from Dennis saying "TO have the chance to compete for a Grey Cup this year and next, Saskatchewan just made sense"....................................................lol.

dollars and sense, they soo often go hand in hand. As in the hand full of money covers up the sense.

Posted

lafrance to ssk is supposed to be done. Seems like they are spending like drunk sailors again. I would like to see him have the chance to start. Too bad he wont have a chance to play on a good offense. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

lafrance to ssk is supposed to be done. Seems like they are spending like drunk sailors again. I would like to see him have the chance to start. Too bad he wont have a chance to play on a good offense. 

That's what people said about our signings last year...

LaFrance makes a lot of sense for Sask, wish we could have got him here...  love to see two Cdn backs

Posted
2 minutes ago, Floyd said:

That's what people said about our signings last year...

LaFrance makes a lot of sense for Sask, wish we could have got him here...  love to see two Cdn backs

yes but we went in with a lot of expired salary and a low cap the previous year. Thats the difference. 

Posted

not proven...overpayed...big upfront money and cap hit and truly doubt he can be a premiere back in an offence. If plans are for him to be a ratio breaking spot on starting roster then they just got weaker as an offence, and if he can't produce is going to be a expensive back up.

Glad we "missed out" on this one

Posted
1 minute ago, Booch said:

not proven...overpayed...big upfront money and cap hit and truly doubt he can be a premiere back in an offence. If plans are for him to be a ratio breaking spot on starting roster then they just got weaker as an offence, and if he can't produce is going to be a expensive back up.

Glad we "missed out" on this one

Coates and Hurl $$ probably equal LaFrance...  I would have overpaid for ratio insurance

Posted

normand is a better back than LaFrance...so we set there no worries if Harris needs a breather or goes down in game, and truthfully I would start him in place of if we couldn't alter the ratio to allow for Flanders, or another American back

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...