LeBird Posted June 8, 2017 Report Posted June 8, 2017 21 hours ago, rebusrankin said: Mr. and Mrs. Goodman's boy. Actually Ms Brown's son. (really)
the watcher Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 (edited) A big thanks to everyone for the camp reports and other general info.I rarely check the papers now,I just read Tate's stuff and here. Edited June 9, 2017 by the watcher CodyT, Nickthesizz, voodoochylde and 3 others 6
ddanger Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 On 2017-06-06 at 0:33 PM, Mike said: Nichols and Medlock want to play to get used to the field. I'm good with it. speaking of Medlock.....how's the kicker that we just drafted looking??
bigg jay Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Depth chart for tomorrow is up. Mike, Tracker, blue_gold_84 and 1 other 4
bigg jay Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 No Hurl listed so Knox & Stone will get ample time to show what thy can do at MLB. wbbfan 1
Mike Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Immediately I'm nervous that Hurl isn't going. Rich, CodyT, Bigblue204 and 7 others 10
bigg jay Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Had the same initial reaction but I'm hoping it's only because they want to give one of these guys a legit shot at the #1 spot. They know what we'll get from Hurl so let's see what these guys can do when the lights come on. I also think it's fitting we're playing the Riders because that receiving core (outside of Stafford) is very green!
sweep the leg Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Just now, Mike said: Immediately I'm nervous that Hurl isn't going. I'm not. We know basically as fact that he'll be on the team, and the coaches already know what he brings. Let the other two guys get all the reps tomorrow. I find it interesting that Temple is starting at wil. That doesn't seem like a great sign for him in the mlb battle. Stone must be impressing. He definitely has the prototypical mlb build.
Booch Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 yeah me too. Hoping that isn't an indication that he is the projected starter at the moment. But on the flip side, if that Johnson is the real deal at DT, or another impact import we could actually have Hurl out there with not a lot of issues I think with our D-line with Wety, Nevis and Oko and another strong dominant tackle they could cause so much havoc and eliminate a lot of the untouched runs until the second level that a guy like Hurl wouldn't get washed out and actually be in his gap as they claimed and become support more than the center of the attack. Rotate in a Corney, Ekakite, Butcher, Thomas to spell off an import and u could sub out Hurl as well in those packages and still maintain the ratio. Still would prefer an Amerk Thumper up the gut, but this could be adequate initially Noeller 1
Jpan85 Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 16 minutes ago, Mike said: Immediately I'm nervous that Hurl isn't going. No Thomas Miles either.
Booch Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 but this is what pre-season is for...get a feel for the guys who are new and you are not sure about...the knowns are just that known...they can knock of the rust in game 2, and show they are better than un upstart that showed well in game 1 and may get a second chance in game 2 to cement it... and really...sask will be filled with a lot of nobodies as well, and as foe established quality veterans, they prob only have about 12 tops anyway
Noeller Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Best case scenario is one of the new guys jumps off the page and stakes a claim. Get it done, Knox!! Bigblue204, Atomic, rebusrankin and 3 others 6
Jpan85 Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Think it's more of a special teams thing get that Hurl Miller and Miles were left at home. They know they can play there give opportunity to young guys to get few more reps.
Fatty Liver Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 23 minutes ago, Booch said: yeah me too. Hoping that isn't an indication that he is the projected starter at the moment. But on the flip side, if that Johnson is the real deal at DT, or another impact import we could actually have Hurl out there with not a lot of issues I think with our D-line with Wety, Nevis and Oko and another strong dominant tackle they could cause so much havoc and eliminate a lot of the untouched runs until the second level that a guy like Hurl wouldn't get washed out and actually be in his gap as they claimed and become support more than the center of the attack. Rotate in a Corney, Ekakite, Butcher, Thomas to spell off an import and u could sub out Hurl as well in those packages and still maintain the ratio. Still would prefer an Amerk Thumper up the gut, but this could be adequate initially Playing 3 import D-lineman and 3 import O-lineman just doesn't seem like a sustainable approach, I'd rather play Thomas/Butcher/Ekakitie than roll with mediocrity in Hurl, who is a cut below Bass in performance. If they really want to keep "Poop" to backup Nevis, replace Scott who has been virtually invisible since his arrival. Tracker 1
Nickthesizz Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Playing 3 import D-lineman and 3 import O-lineman just doesn't seem like a sustainable approach, I'd rather play Thomas/Butcher/Ekakitie than roll with mediocrity in Hurl, who is a cut below Bass in performance. If they really want to keep "Poop" to backup Nevis, replace Scott who has been virtually invisible since his arrival. i don't know, Bass was pretty bad last night if you watched the game. Just watching Ekakitie move I'm liking him more and more , guy seems like a professional and dedicated to improving. I'm willing to give Hurl a chance, don't think he'll be a typical starter on every play but could be useful. Jake Thomas looks a little weak but is pretty quick and has good feet. Butcher is just the opposite, this dude is probably the second or third biggest guy on the team behind Hardrick and Bond. Edited June 9, 2017 by Gotmilt
rebusrankin Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Curious that there's no Neufeld. Does that mean he's on the team or is he going to be the Vet cut? Jesse and Atomic 2
Mike Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Curious that there's no Neufeld. Does that mean he's on the team or is he going to be the Vet cut? didn't even notice that but nice catch, that's definitely interesting!
SPuDS Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 3 hours ago, bigg jay said: Depth chart for tomorrow is up. why cant I see the depth chart. All I get is ""
bearpants Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Playing 3 import D-lineman and 3 import O-lineman just doesn't seem like a sustainable approach, I'd rather play Thomas/Butcher/Ekakitie than roll with mediocrity in Hurl, who is a cut below Bass in performance. If they really want to keep "Poop" to backup Nevis, replace Scott who has been virtually invisible since his arrival. interesting point... not that you were trying to start this debate... but what is the better sum of parts?.... 2 dominant* import DTs with Hurl (or Miles) at MLB or a better import MLB with the Canadian rotating in at DT... If the D-line can mitigate runners getting to the next level, it reduces the need for a major thumper at MLB... just some food for thought/conversation... *to be determined Fatty Liver 1
Fatty Liver Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, bearpants said: interesting point... not that you were trying to start this debate... but what is the better sum of parts?.... 2 dominant* import DTs with Hurl (or Miles) at MLB or a better import MLB with the Canadian rotating in at DT... If the D-line can mitigate runners getting to the next level, it reduces the need for a major thumper at MLB... just some food for thought/conversation... *to be determined I'm also biased, I really want to see how Corney, Butcher and Ekakitie work out on the D-Line. If they can't create pressure then okay, 3 imports gives them another path to pursue. kelownabomberfan and rebusrankin 2
Tracker Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Come on now. This is a whole new level of competition for Ekakitie, so it may take a game or two for him to get used to things. If he pancakes Bennett, that would be a good ego-boo for him.
Nickthesizz Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 Real question, who on this board would trade any of our qbs for any of the riders qbs? Personally I think it's a wash so far between Apocada and Bennett but Davis and Lefevour are far more promising than Glenn and Brandon Bridge
Fatty Liver Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Gotmilt said: Real question, who on this board would trade any of our qbs for any of the riders qbs? Personally I think it's a wash so far between Apocada and Bennett but Davis and Lefevour are far more promising than Glenn and Brandon Bridge I think the competition is between Bennett and Davis at this point to see which one eventually morphs into a starter. Apodaca is still in kindergarten. Edited June 9, 2017 by Throw Long Bannatyne
Nickthesizz Posted June 9, 2017 Report Posted June 9, 2017 23 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: I think the competition is between Bennett and Davis at this point to see which one eventually morphs into a starter. Apodaca is still in kindergarten. I agree, however I said which would you rather have not who is better. Obviously if you needed to win a game you're not sticking in Apodaca over Glenn but in the long term I'd rather have our guys.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now