Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Taynted_Fayth said:

Bridge played well considering, but our D wasn't exactly our starters.. No Westerman, Leggett, Loffler, Wild, Thomas, Randle and a whole lot of rotating going on. 

It's kind of why I'm not really worried about Nichols performance. If we didn't play the riders so soon again when it counts, I doubt he even sees the field tonight. But not having Adams, Dressler and Harris in his offense certainly has a big impact on his play too

Thats true. The way he beat them is the way you beat our starters though. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

This is the Lankford fumble, if that was off a punt than the Rider player was definitely within 5 yds.

 

 

How did they not call no yards on that?  The Sask cover guy was literally in the air as Lankford was catching the ball...

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

Thats true. The way he beat them is the way you beat our starters though. 

By kicking 6 field goals? Riders had 1 TD 

Edited by Goalie
Posted
Just now, Goalie said:

By kicking 6 field goals? Riders had 1 TD 

thats the exact same way we made the play offs last year remember? By beating any pressure, taking what the D gives you and YAC. If you try to force passes against against our D you risk a pick. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

I'm not known for my blue colored glasses, but it certainly looks like the Riders were within 5 yards meaning no fumble and Bomber ball 15 yards up the field.

is that challengeable?

review on turnover cannot correct error?

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BigBlue said:

is that challengeable?

review on turnover cannot correct error?

We challenged it and lost the challenge and a timeout. My guess is that there wasn't any more than the one angle so they went with the call on the field.

Posted (edited)

I thought the whole "eye in the sky" thing was to be used to remedy close or iffy calls/non-calls but it's been much of the same old, same old. It looked like a flag should've been thrown on that play.

Then again, it is pre-season.

Edited by blue_gold_84
Posted (edited)

It's good Lankford redeemed himself later in the game, though. It's just too bad the nice TD return he had was negated on an offside penalty.

Edited by blue_gold_84
Posted
2 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

Wonder if the Tabbies try to nab Quinn Van Glyswyk from the Riders?

Just signed a scrapheaper named Anthony Fera. A rough first day of camp reportedly

Posted
18 minutes ago, Floyd said:

HOW did you guys lose out on Maher?

 

19 minutes ago, Floyd said:

HOW did you guys lose out on Maher?

He wanted a signig bonus for what amounted mediocre kicking overall and often brutal punting. Austin probably thinks he can get that for less from someone else. I think he,s right

Posted
1 hour ago, blue_gold_84 said:

It's good Lankford redeemed himself later in the game, though. It's just too bad the nice TD return he had was negated on an offside penalty.

He looked very "McDuffiesque" on that return, I don't know if Lankford is the best new receiver option because of his size but I'd like to see them keep him around for awhile to find out.

Posted
2 hours ago, Zontar said:

 

He wanted a signig bonus for what amounted mediocre kicking overall and often brutal punting. Austin probably thinks he can get that for less from someone else. I think he,s right

Is sergio castillo a FA still? He looked bloody good for us last preseason / camp. 

1 hour ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

He looked very "McDuffiesque" on that return, I don't know if Lankford is the best new receiver option because of his size but I'd like to see them keep him around for awhile to find out.

Yeah he did. Liggins catch looked pretty dang good on the replay. Washington iirc had a couple called back and has looked good in camp. The tier of WRs on the bubble all have some pretty interesting skill/size/athleticism. They are gonna have some tough choices on that last wr spot. Being able to return and a legit threat to score is really gonna help lankford. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

Is sergio castillo a FA still? He looked bloody good for us last preseason / camp. 

Yeah he did. Liggins catch looked pretty dang good on the replay. Washington iirc had a couple called back and has looked good in camp. The tier of WRs on the bubble all have some pretty interesting skill/size/athleticism. They are gonna have some tough choices on that last wr spot. Being able to return and a legit threat to score is really gonna help lankford. 

he's in Ottawa, watched him miss a convert in the televised Ott/Ham game the other night

Posted
Just now, Taynted_Fayth said:

he's in Ottawa, watched him miss a convert in the televised Ott/Ham game the other night

:lol: Thanks i couldnt recall if he got picked up some place or not. 

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Is sergio castillo a FA still? He looked bloody good for us last preseason / camp. 

Yeah he did. Liggins catch looked pretty dang good on the replay. Washington iirc had a couple called back and has looked good in camp. The tier of WRs on the bubble all have some pretty interesting skill/size/athleticism. They are gonna have some tough choices on that last wr spot. Being able to return and a legit threat to score is really gonna help lankford. 

The wild card is Daniel Williams, he arrived in camp late so they will have to take a bit more time to have a better look at him.  He's the rookie receiver that carries the most hype imo.  I expect he will be on the PR or IR when the season begins but if he pans out another receiver may have to be cut to accommodate him.

So they have Dressler, Adams, Denmark and JFG or another Canuck locked in positions.  That leaves all of the following competing for one starting import receiver job plus a couple of backups or development guys.

Davis, Lankford, Liggins, Lowder, Peterson, Raper, Sheppard, Stafford, Thorpe, Washington, Williams.

 

Edited by Throw Long Bannatyne

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...