Shaq Murray Lawrence

[JuranBoldenRules]

3 hours ago, bearpants said:

Murray-Lawrence would not be replacing Normand... they are completely different players with mostly different skill sets... so we can eliminate that thought immediately... though I would be interested in having him as a back-up RB and returner if possible...

Only so many roster spots.  I think he'd be good depth but I'd rather have Flanders on the roster if possible.  Also need that H-Back type for run formations.  I think he'd have a tough time getting on our 44 right now.

[Goalie]

Probably Sask bound. They need all the National help they can get... 

I think i'd bring him in but nothing promised to him.. He would have to earn his spot. I actually really liked what Normand did last year in spot duty. Dude is a bull. Im not convinved SML is an upgrade. 

 

9 for 65 yards. Normand

 

17 for 51 yards. Shaq. 

 

 

Edited June 30, 2017 by Goalie

[JCon]

12 hours ago, Goalie said:

Probably Sask bound. They need all the National help they can get... 

I think i'd bring him in but nothing promised to him.. He would have to earn his spot. I actually really liked what Normand did last year in spot duty. Dude is a bull. Im not convinved SML is an upgrade. 

 

9 for 65 yards. Normand

 

17 for 51 yards. Shaq. 

 

 

Only helps Saskatchewan if they're prepared to start him and I don't see that happening.