Jump to content

Bombers acquire Mark Parenteau

kelownabomberfan

By kelownabomberfan
in Blue Bomber Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Atomic
Atomic

Damn you and your logic

Blueandgold
Blueandgold

I never want to see Boatman play another down again. We might as well as give Pencer a shot at this point. 

Mr. Perfect
Mr. Perfect

So does Morley stay as a 6th lineman, cut, traded? Walters keeps plugging away!

17to85 Grand Master

17to85

Posted
Posted

This is a good move. Woodson wasn't doing much and I assume anything he was doing can be done by Foster now, we get a better pick than we give and an olineman who at worst is a good depth guy just because of the multiple positions he can play. What's not to like?

kelownabomberfan Grand Master

kelownabomberfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This is a good move. Woodson wasn't doing much and I assume anything he was doing can be done by Foster now, we get a better pick than we give and an olineman who at worst is a good depth guy just because of the multiple positions he can play. What's not to like?

 

Parenteau is too old and his veteran experience is meaningless - Joe Mack.

TrueBlue Newbie

TrueBlue

Posted
Posted

Parenteau is a plug.  If he's still on our roster next season, that would be a concern.

 

 

Not sure if that would be a concern for me as long as we are addressing the need by way of the draft, free agency or what have you.  Rome wasn't built in a day, our o-line won't be revamped in an off-season.  

iso_55 Newbie

iso_55

Posted
Posted

 

This is a good move. Woodson wasn't doing much and I assume anything he was doing can be done by Foster now, we get a better pick than we give and an olineman who at worst is a good depth guy just because of the multiple positions he can play. What's not to like?

 

Parenteau is too old and his veteran experience is meaningless - Joe Mack.

 

LOL!!! ;) Wait, why  am I laughing???? Oh crap.... :(

Brandon Grand Master

Brandon

Posted
Posted

Is this the trade Burke alluded to last week?

Seems to be more wheeling and dealing in the last three weeks than I remember in a long time.

I can't think of any trades Mack ever did mid season....

JuranBoldenRules Grand Master

JuranBoldenRules

Posted
Posted

 

Parenteau is a plug.  If he's still on our roster next season, that would be a concern.

 

 

Not sure if that would be a concern for me as long as we are addressing the need by way of the draft, free agency or what have you.  Rome wasn't built in a day, our o-line won't be revamped in an off-season.  

 

 

Look at it this way.  If Parenteau is still on our roster (top 6) next season, that basically means none of our OL prospects panned out.

Atomic Experienced

Atomic

Posted
Posted

Tim Burke just said on the coaches' show that Swiston is likely to be out this week and probably longer.  On Parenteau: "He can play center and guard, so he gives us a chance to move some guys around".  Also says Pencer likely will be on the 42 this week.

sweep the leg Enthusiast

sweep the leg

Posted
Posted

 

 

Parenteau is a plug.  If he's still on our roster next season, that would be a concern.

 

 

Not sure if that would be a concern for me as long as we are addressing the need by way of the draft, free agency or what have you.  Rome wasn't built in a day, our o-line won't be revamped in an off-season.  

 

 

Look at it this way.  If Parenteau is still on our roster (top 6) next season, that basically means none of our OL prospects panned out.

 

Why couldn't Greaves, Swiston, & Pencer all be on the roster at the same time as Parenteau?

kelownabomberfan Grand Master

kelownabomberfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

 

Parenteau is a plug.  If he's still on our roster next season, that would be a concern.

 

 

Not sure if that would be a concern for me as long as we are addressing the need by way of the draft, free agency or what have you.  Rome wasn't built in a day, our o-line won't be revamped in an off-season.  

 

 

Look at it this way.  If Parenteau is still on our roster (top 6) next season, that basically means none of our OL prospects panned out.

 

 

This must be that new math that my nephew was talking about that they are teaching in school, because I don't get it.

braddman19 Newbie

braddman19

Posted
Posted

 

Is this the trade Burke alluded to last week?

Seems to be more wheeling and dealing in the last three weeks than I remember in a long time.

I can't think of any trades Mack ever did mid season....

 

 

I might have the blinders on here, but I seriously can't remember ANY trade that Mack did....

JuranBoldenRules Grand Master

JuranBoldenRules

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

Parenteau is a plug.  If he's still on our roster next season, that would be a concern.

 

 

Not sure if that would be a concern for me as long as we are addressing the need by way of the draft, free agency or what have you.  Rome wasn't built in a day, our o-line won't be revamped in an off-season.  

 

 

Look at it this way.  If Parenteau is still on our roster (top 6) next season, that basically means none of our OL prospects panned out.

 

Why couldn't Greaves, Swiston, & Pencer all be on the roster at the same time as Parenteau?

 

We need a starting guard, a RT, and an upgrade at C (likely difficult with Ottawa).  Parenteau is a very shaky centre in terms of snapping, Swiston and Pencer should fill the starting RT or G position and 6th OL depending on how we deploy our ratio.  That leaves a possible starting guard spot that we'll have to address through trade or free agency if we go with 4 NI's.  My assumption is that we'll go with 3 NI's and 2 IMPs with the talent spreading out 9 ways.  If Parenteau is starting for us in 2014, we're in trouble, he's a below average player, although many of those will exist on rosters next season with Ottawa coming in, I believe the addition of Parenteau was made to finish this season not for next season.

17to85 Grand Master

17to85

Posted
Posted

 

 

Is this the trade Burke alluded to last week?

Seems to be more wheeling and dealing in the last three weeks than I remember in a long time.

I can't think of any trades Mack ever did mid season....

 

 

I might have the blinders on here, but I seriously can't remember ANY trade that Mack did....

 

Jyles to Toronto, trading picks to move up in the draft 2 years ago, there were some others that I can't quite recall right now. Trades aren't commonplace in the CFL though so not sure that means a hell of a lot. 

Blueandgold Contributor

Blueandgold

Posted
Posted

 

Is there the potential now to start three Canadian receivers or is that asking too much.  And if you can add a non-import starter on the O line and at receive, what does that do for us?

 

So who do you sit then?  Denmark?  Edwards?  Sims-Walker?  Aaron Kelly?  I vote none of the above. Instead lets start an import at Safety.

 

Denmark had a good game, but I would still sit him or Sims-Walker to play Etienne, Kohlert and Watson together.

SPuDS Newbie

SPuDS

Posted
Posted

woodson never really got into a groove here... every offense we ran didnt seem to suit his skill set. trading him and landing any oliner PLUS moving up in the draft is pretty impressive in my books.. parenteau is solid.. not all world but flexible enough to play all interior spots and be a starter..

cant see how anyone finds fault in this... especially those who believe our oline is so pathetic as is..

Jacquie Newbie

Jacquie

Posted
Posted

 

I might have the blinders on here, but I seriously can't remember ANY trade that Mack did....

 

Jyles to Toronto, trading picks to move up in the draft 2 years ago, there were some others that I can't quite recall right now. Trades aren't commonplace in the CFL though so not sure that means a hell of a lot. 

 

IIRC he traded picks in every draft to get more picks, didn't he? There was also the trade with Edmonton where we got two late round draft picks for Taylor Inglis (one of the picks turned out to be Carl Volny). There was the Odell Willis trade with Saskatchewan.

Mr Dee Newbie

Mr Dee

Posted
Posted

 

Also, Burke said that Woodson is a free agent and he told him that they would be pursuing him again.

Couldn't believe he said that on the radio, and right after he said he doesn't want to get fined for talking about refs.  Heard of tampering?

 

Yes, that crossed my mind. I have to believe this was somewhere in their talks, either when they were trying to get him to re-sign or at a point at the actual trade but just before the confirmation/finalization. At this point it's only tempering.

 

Phew, i knew we were in the clear.

Atomic Experienced

Atomic

Posted
Posted

Most of Mack's trades were to gain or get rid of spare parts, or give us a better draft position.  He wasn't going to make a big splash mid-season like Walters has, but he definitely did a good job of getting a good return when he did pull the trigger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

×
×
  • Create New...