Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, bearpants said:

I was gonna say this stat is almost amazing... but, I think @Atomic summed it up better!

Goes to show you can't win much without a capable/durable starting QB. 2012-2015 for the Bombers demonstrates just that. And looking back on it... All kinds of ugly.

Posted
17 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said:

Goes to show you can't win much without a capable/durable starting QB. 2012-2015 for the Bombers demonstrates just that. And looking back on it... All kinds of ugly.

OL needs to be capable/durable just as importantly as the QB. Nichols success came from a solid OL. This year when the OL has bought him time (like the 3rd quarter vs sask) he lights it up,  when they falter,  so does Nichols. 

this message has been brought to us by

Related image

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Taynted_Fayth said:

OL needs to be capable/durable just as importantly as the QB. Nichols success came from a solid OL. This year when the OL has bought him time (like the 3rd quarter vs sask) he lights it up,  when they falter,  so does Nichols.

No question a solid O-line is important in maximizing a QB's chance at success. However, you can win with a middle of the pack O-line permitted your QB has the talent. The Eskimos in 2015 demonstrated just that. Perhaps even the same argument could be made for the Lions last season.

From 2012-2015, the Bombers had neither. On second thought, from about 2009 they had neither.

Edited by blue_gold_84

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...