wbbfan Posted August 23, 2017 Report Posted August 23, 2017 5 hours ago, bearpants said: I completely agree... all I, and a few others, were saying is that he was believed to be pro-ready when he was drafted... the fact that he's not playing much is no big deal at all... Corney and couture still arent ready. Though corney is looking better and better. He imo, is a better prospect then ekakitie. It was a heavy futures draft for us.
Tracker Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 2 hours ago, Blueandgold said: Flanders is too good to not play. He deserves to be on the game day roster all year long. What I'd like to see, is Santo-Knox get a shot at starting and benching Kyle Knox. Kyle Knox has to be the biggest disappointment of the year. He has the athleticism and aggressive attitude but is clueless.
Nickthesizz Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 4 hours ago, Mike said: To me, and I don't mean to simplify this ... Ekakitie at TC looked like an out of shape, sloppy mess. When I've seen him in practice lately, he looks WAY better. Yup like I said in nicer terms.
mbrg Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 4 hours ago, Mike said: Since we played them 3 weeks ago, they've lost Keith Shologan, Chris Ackie, Philip Blake and J-C Beaulieu for Canadian starters / rotational pieces. They've literally got probably one Canadian starter that would start in other lineups in the league (Westerman) Hey, just hold on now. Sam Giguere wouldn't just be a starter, he'd be the MOP as far as the RodBlacks are concerned.
M.O.A.B. Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 (edited) Edited August 24, 2017 by M.O.A.B.
Rod Black Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 10 hours ago, mbrg said: Hey, just hold on now. Sam Giguere wouldn't just be a starter, he'd be the MOP as far as the RodBlacks are concerned. Of course. I mean, just look at the guy. Judd 1
GCJenks Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 11 hours ago, mbrg said: Hey, just hold on now. Sam Giguere wouldn't just be a starter, he'd be the MOP as far as the RodBlacks are concerned. Having to start Sam Giguere ahead of Nik Lewis because of ratio issues speaks volumes about what they have to work with right now. Atomic and Fred C Dobbs 1 1
Fred C Dobbs Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 Yeah, it's crazy that Thick Nik needs 9 receptions to become the All-Time Leader and they can't afford to start him.
bearpants Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 27 minutes ago, GCJenks said: Having to start Sam Giguere ahead of Nik Lewis because of ratio issues speaks volumes about what they have to work with right now. You can bet Lewis will be on the field for much of the game... but that also means there will be a fullback in play or one of Cunningham/Jackson will be on the bench... both situations play well for us... GCJenks, Fred C Dobbs and blue_gold_84 3
Booch Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 YEAH thats some pretty poor Canadian depth...we gotta be so grateful now how Walters has constructed the Bombers...never much of a worry as of late in regards to ratio and depth and being hand-cuffed with who we can start rebusrankin, Tracker and GCJenks 3
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, Booch said: YEAH thats some pretty poor Canadian depth...we gotta be so grateful now how Walters has constructed the Bombers...never much of a worry as of late in regards to ratio and depth and being hand-cuffed with who we can start I think he's done well but we aren't out of the woods. A significant injury to any of our NI D starters would be tough to manage while maintaining this level of play. Harris, Hurl or Loffler get hurt and we are in big trouble IMO. rebusrankin and Atomic 2
Booch Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 I don't think so really, as Oshea says and I agree, Jones could easily step in and start at either wide side corner or safety, and I'm sure a rotation of Westerman, Corney, Thomas on the d-line would keep us just as we are and producing just fine. As it stands now at times we have 4, sometimes 5 nationals in on plays in defense anyway, so basically we would just switch who technically is the actual starter on the game day depth chart, but in actuality just continue to rotate and roll our guys as usual.
WBBFanWest Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 20 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: I think he's done well but we aren't out of the woods. A significant injury to any of our NI D starters would be tough to manage while maintaining this level of play. Harris, Hurl or Loffler get hurt and we are in big trouble IMO. Big trouble? No, I don't think so. Will there be a drop off? Well, anytime you lose a starter and have to play a backup, you should expect that there will be some drop off. I think that National depth wise, we are in a position where we can absorb a hit and still be more than competitive. sweep the leg, Blueandgold and blue_gold_84 2 1
Tracker Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 48 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: I think he's done well but we aren't out of the woods. A significant injury to any of our NI D starters would be tough to manage while maintaining this level of play. Harris, Hurl or Loffler get hurt and we are in big trouble IMO. Hurl would not be missed all that much. We could just put up one of those yellow signs you see on wet floors in commercial buildings and it would serve equally well. The opposing running backs could trip over that. JCon, blue_gold_84, Blueandgold and 1 other 1 1 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 3 hours ago, Booch said: I don't think so really, as Oshea says and I agree, Jones could easily step in and start at either wide side corner or safety, and I'm sure a rotation of Westerman, Corney, Thomas on the d-line would keep us just as we are and producing just fine. As it stands now at times we have 4, sometimes 5 nationals in on plays in defense anyway, so basically we would just switch who technically is the actual starter on the game day depth chart, but in actuality just continue to rotate and roll our guys as usual. And way less flexibility which basically renders your DIs moot. IMO we are short a DB/LB guy who can reliably play 70% or more of downs in case we have an injury. I don't mind Jones but I personally haven't seen him play safety and he really hasn't at any length even in his preseasons. You'd have to hope practice reps translate to good instincts. Most likely any lengthy D injuries of NIs is going to require a ratio change on the OL or at receiver to maintain the ability to run good sub packages on D. Knock on wood. rebusrankin 1
Jimmy Pop Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 20 hours ago, Mike said: Montreal's 7 Canadian starters: Luc Brodeur-Jordain, Kristian Matte, George Johnson, Samuel Giguere, Jabar Westerman, Jesse Joseph and Dondre Wright That is ugly ugly ugly Holy heck I guess I don't know this league at all! I haven't heard of half those guys. 20 hours ago, Mike said: Since we played them 3 weeks ago, they've lost Keith Shologan, Chris Ackie, Philip Blake and J-C Beaulieu for Canadian starters / rotational pieces. They've literally got probably one Canadian starter that would start in other lineups in the league (Westerman) Oh....well that explains that. GCJenks 1
Jimmy Pop Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 (edited) . Edited August 24, 2017 by Jimmy Pop dbl post :/
M.O.A.B. Posted August 24, 2017 Report Posted August 24, 2017 #IsIt6:30yet GCJenks, Jimmy Pop and bigg jay 2 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now