Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, bryan35 said:

Sask could have claimed him from our practice roster but I guess they didn't want to activate him?

He'll probably end up on their PR anyway, I think Bailey may have been inured against the Stamps.

Posted

regardless a pick for a guy that most likely would never have seen the field for us is a good return. Possibly making space for a new addition??

Add a Mulumba and and place a Banning or something on the PR?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Booch said:

regardless a pick for a guy that most likely would never have seen the field for us is a good return. Possibly making space for a new addition??

Add a Mulumba and and place a Banning or something on the PR?

We still have space in the PR plus will be expanding to 15 in Oct 1.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Booch said:

regardless a pick for a guy that most likely would never have seen the field for us is a good return. Possibly making space for a new addition??

Add a Mulumba and and place a Banning or something on the PR?

Are you referring to Kahlen Branning Nat DB? Isn't he already on the PR? Or are you referring to someone else?

Posted
4 hours ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

Clear sign Wolitarsky is superior.  Pretty ridiculous how many players the Riders are taking on at this time, it's like TC 2.0 for them.

What they need is a QB ;)

Posted
4 hours ago, nate007 said:

If he was on our PR, why would they give us a pick for him? Couldn't they just sign him to their active roster?

Maybe they tried that and he refused...

We could still have activated him to our active roster and blocked them from taking him.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...