bearpants Posted September 28, 2017 Report Posted September 28, 2017 38 minutes ago, pigseye said: The magnitude of this game is only now starting to sink in. Win and they all but lock up second place and a home playoff game, lose and it will be a dog fight to the end. If my math is correct... the magic number to clinch a home playoff game (if we beat Edm) will be 2...
TrueBlue4ever Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 4 hours ago, bearpants said: If my math is correct... the magic number to clinch a home playoff game (if we beat Edm) will be 2... If we beat the Eskimos, then yes the number to clinch a home game is 2. And the number to clinch a playoff spot will be one, provided there are no more ties in the CFL season. Mark F 1
BigBlue Posted September 29, 2017 Author Report Posted September 29, 2017 Anybody seen a depth chart yet? If so can you post it please, pretty please ...
do or die Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 What will it take? More ball control.
BBlink Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 Looks like they are going with an additional DB (Porter) to replace Dressler. Some anti aircraft artillery against the potent Eskimo air attack.
Fatty Liver Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 7 hours ago, BigBlue said: Anybody seen a depth chart yet? If so can you post it please, pretty please ... blue_gold_84 1
Mark F Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) Has Sam Hurl ever missed a game due to injury? I don't think so. insert joke here : _______________________________ My theory is the defensive backfield has improved quite a bit. Guess we're about to find out. Heath/Randall going to get some picks methinks. Maybe Alexander too. In addition to a win, I hope to see some headphone throwing, or kicking something over on the Edmonton sideline. Might be good to see a player pull that, to see what happens. maybe a baseball style coach screaming in referee face incident. Edited September 29, 2017 by Mark F
17to85 Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 The Esks DL is much healthier and their secondary much improved since last we faced them. Good thing their linebackers still look iffy. SPuDS 1
Mark H. Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 48 minutes ago, Noeller said: What an unbelievable receiving corps. Watson should be open almost by default. SPuDS 1
USABomberfan Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 On 9/28/2017 at 10:16 AM, bearpants said: We can still lose this game and win the season series... as long as we lose by 6 or less... so really a loss potentially isn't the end of the world... that being said, a win would just be much simpler! Obviously not considering we got Hamilton next week and a two full game lead on them. But it would be the first time we actually swept these villains in a long time, and it'd be great to see this team go 14-4 this season. bearpants 1
TBURGESS Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 A win and we're still in the hunt for 1st overall. A loss, especially by more than a TD and we're in a fight for 2nd place. SPuDS 1
17to85 Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 9 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: A loss, especially by more than a TD and we're in a fight for 2nd place. Why does it matter how much they lose by?
Mark H. Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 5 hours ago, do or die said: What will it take? More ball control. Indeed - keep Reilly & his Hail Mary threats off the field
Atomic Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 21 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Why does it matter how much they lose by? If we lose, the season series is tied with Edmonton... but if we lose by less than a TD, we still win the tiebreaker.
TBURGESS Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) 32 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Why does it matter how much they lose by? Cuz we beat em by a TD. If they win by more than a TD, they get the series. Edited September 29, 2017 by TBURGESS
17to85 Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 OK that at least makes sense, though I am not worried about being tied with any teams to be honest. Just don't think it's in the cards. We will either finish ahead of them or we won't.
HardCoreBlue Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 6 hours ago, do or die said: What will it take? More ball control. That and Loffler staying healthy so Jones doesn't see the field at safety. He's been horrendous imho. Tracker 1
bearpants Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 yikes... that's an impressive receiving group Edm has...
TBURGESS Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 Grymes back is big for Edmonton's D. Jesse 1
SPuDS Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 Just now, TBURGESS said: Grymes back is big for Edmonton's D. yes and no. He may still be feeling the woes from the NFL and getting cut. He also will have to adjust to the field again and the new schemes but ya, its gonna be a boost.. just not huge imo right off the hop.
mbrg Posted September 29, 2017 Report Posted September 29, 2017 6 hours ago, do or die said: What will it take? More ball control. That might be a bit chicken and egg - the Bombers had success against Edmonton in the last game by running the hurry-up offence as much as possible, but one of the statistical consequences was losing the time of possession battle. I'd argue losing that battle is what helped them win the game. If we slow the offence down to hang on to the ball for more of the game, we don't take advantage of their defensive weaknesses like we did last time. blue_gold_84, SPuDS and shadybob 1 2
BigBlueFanatic Posted September 30, 2017 Report Posted September 30, 2017 Just to be clear - according to the depth chart Nevis starts while poop is a healthy scratch (again)??
Guest J5V Posted September 30, 2017 Report Posted September 30, 2017 8 minutes ago, BigBlueFanatic said: Just to be clear - according to the depth chart Nevis starts while poop is a healthy scratch (again)?? Sigh. Poop is the new Thorpe.
BBlink Posted September 30, 2017 Report Posted September 30, 2017 3 hours ago, J5V said: Sigh. Poop is the new Thorpe. Nope. Poop is getting paid BigBlueFanatic 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now