rebusrankin Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 26 minutes ago, SPuDS said: wish granted. I knew I should have wished for $$$. Mark F 1
SPuDS Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 Just now, rebusrankin said: I knew I should have wished for $$$. lotto numbers woulda been best lol.
mbrg Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Noeller said: Should make some people happy that it appears Lankford is out of the offense and back to KR only... I'd wait on those two game-time scratches before popping any corks but Lankford has exclusively played wideout from what I remember, so if Givens is practising at slot then he's very likely playing unless Washington doesn't nail down the WR spot, and they decide to move him into the slot (I thought he's played both) and keep Lankford outside and Just to make it an extra-spicy meatball, from what I recall, Givens did kick returns in the NFL. SPuDS 1
shadybob Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 For all the **** that's said about Lankford, I think I would rather have him line up as a WR over Washington. Sometimes you gotta choose between a ****** and a turd sandwich though I guess. SPuDS 1
Goalie Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 Washington last game contributed more on O than Lankford has in like the last oh i dunno... However many games since his first play TD. SPuDS 1
Blueandgold Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, shadybob said: For all the **** that's said about Lankford, I think I would rather have him line up as a WR over Washington. Sometimes you gotta choose between a ****** and a turd sandwich though I guess. Washington made a few decent catches against the Lions, that’s more than I can say for Lankford who provides literally nothing. SPuDS and Goalie 2
Blueandgold Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 What are the chances we can coax Ryan Smith to come play these last few games for us? That’s how desperate we are. SPuDS 1
Goalie Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Blueandgold said: Washington made a few decent catches against the Lions, that’s more than I can say for Lankford who provides literally nothing. Last catch lankford made was like against Ottawa. I truly dont recall any recent ones.
blue_gold_84 Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 Just now, Blueandgold said: What are the chances we can coax Ryan Smith to come play these last few games for us? That’s how desperate we are. Considering Dressler is back and Givens will get a look this week, not really. It makes absolutely no sense to try and "coax" a guy out of retirement who probably hasn't done anything football-related in months. Goalie and SPuDS 1 1
blue_gold_84 Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Goalie said: Last catch lankford made was like against Ottawa. I truly dont recall any recent ones. He didn't have a reception vs. OTT a few weeks back. He had 2 @ EDM and 3 vs. BC, though. Goalie and SPuDS 2
SPuDS Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Goalie said: Washington last game contributed more on O than Lankford has in like the last oh i dunno... However many games since his first play TD. still hasn't looked good but I agree, looked more capable on offense then Lankford has.
Blueandgold Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: Considering Dressler is back and Givens will get a look this week, not really. It makes absolutely no sense to try and "coax" a guy out of retirement who probably hasn't done anything football-related in months. I was being facetious, but with Denmark’s disappearing act, Lankfords inability, and Washington being meh we still have a need. I hope Givens looks good, but it’s his first CFL game. SPuDS 1
Goalie Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: He didn't have a reception vs. OTT a few weeks back. He had 2 @ EDM and 3 vs. BC, though. I meant the big play TD... Thats his only memorable play.. Think that was Ottawa weeks ago..
blue_gold_84 Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 Just now, Goalie said: I meant the big play TD... Thats his only memorable play.. Think that was Ottawa weeks ago.. That was vs. OTT... But back in early August. Goalie 1
Goalie Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: That was vs. OTT... But back in early August. Exactly. Says all u need to know doesnt it lol. August. SPuDS 1
Mr Dee Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 RECEIVING against BC PLAYER REC YDS YAC AVG LG TD FEOLI GUDINO, Julian 6 48 14 8.0 13 0 WASHINGTON, L'Damian 4 36 4 9.0 16 0 HARRIS, Andrew 6 33 13 5.5 15 0 LANKFORD, Ryan 3 22 3 7.3 9 0 ADAMS, Darvin 1 20 0 20.0 20 0 DENMARK, Clarence 1 9 2 9.0 9 0 NORMAND, Christophe 2 4 4 2.0 6 0
Goalie Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 3 for 22? Wow the production. I believe someone should show his entire season stats.. 15 GP 20 catches 260 yards... Thats not good. SPuDS 1
SPuDS Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 for our outside speeder/burner.. those ain't stats i'm loving.
Noeller Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) @DarrinBauming Super fluid situation as we watch the reps amongst linebackers at #Bombers practice. Knox, Santos-Knox, Wild, Hurl all involved at mack&will. The #Bombers D found success vs BC by bringing multiple looks and different personnel packages to throw off their opponent. @DarrinBauming Kevin Fogg is getting the lion's share of work at Moe Leggett's vacated dimeback spot today. #Bombers @DarrinBauming Mike O'Shea says they would like to get Ian Wild into the lineup this week. Sounds like it is a likelihood. #Bombers visit #Argos Saturday. Edited October 18, 2017 by Noeller Mark F, SPuDS, Fatty Liver and 2 others 4 1
Fatty Liver Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 53 minutes ago, SPuDS said: still hasn't looked good but I agree, looked more capable on offense then Lankford has. I still prefer Lankford over Washington just for those sweeps they run once or twice per game, Lankford is better with YAC. SPuDS, Mr Dee and blue_gold_84 3
BomberBall Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: I still prefer Lankford over Washington just for those sweeps they run once or twice per game, Lankford is better with YAC. Only if there's a clearly blocked path for him. Both of them have speed, but neither seems to have much shiftiness. SPuDS 1
Noeller Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 they'll be using Dress for that, now, I'd reckon... SPuDS 1
Fatty Liver Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, BomberBall said: Only if there's a clearly blocked path for him. Both of them have speed, but neither seems to have much shiftiness. I think O'Shea beat the shiftiness out of Lankford and convinced him to run straight ahead, I recall early season games when he returned kickoffs like "a car without a steering wheel" to quote D.O.D. SPuDS 1
Floyd Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 1 hour ago, mbrg said: I'd wait on those two game-time scratches before popping any corks but Lankford has exclusively played wideout from what I remember, so if Givens is practising at slot then he's very likely playing unless Washington doesn't nail down the WR spot, and they decide to move him into the slot (I thought he's played both) and keep Lankford outside and Just to make it an extra-spicy meatball, from what I recall, Givens did kick returns in the NFL. You're writing very dramatically today. BigBlueFanatic 1
BBlink Posted October 18, 2017 Report Posted October 18, 2017 As great a player as Moe Leggett is (probably my favourite Bomber), we've got pretty good depth behind him. Fogg has already shown that he can step up and make some plays on defense. The concern is of course our offense. A QB with a busted up hand (I saw a difference), and virtually no receiving depth. We need one of our new receivers to step up big time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now