Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, Blueandgold said:

Durant has to be a better backup than Glenn. We know that Glenn is going to fold when the weather gets cold, Durant has played some of the best games of his career in November.

Can Durant even win games in August and September anymore?

Posted
42 minutes ago, MOBomberFan said:

It's happening...

That would be a good move by the Esks IMO.  With that O, KG5 could definitely win games from the bullpen if needed.

 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, DR. CFL said:

Edm will likely take Glenn over LeFleour or Davis wouldn’t you think. Wpg needs a better back up plain and simple.

Durant will be available after next Monday (Jan15). There will be less options left for him to go to - Winnipeg is high on the list, then maybe Ham, BC and/or Calgary. 

Edited by M.O.A.B.
Posted
3 hours ago, M.O.A.B. said:

Durant will be available after next Monday (Jan15). There will be less options left for him to go to - Winnipeg is high on the list, then maybe Ham, BC and/or Calgary. 

How you know?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Brandon said:

I'd assume if the money was the same Durant would want Winnipeg because of familiarity with LaPo.

Not that important, if he comes to WPG.  his main priority should be familiarizing himself with the bench way off in the far corner of the field and how it feels to be glued to his ass.  Doesn't say much about this regime's ability to scout and recruit QB prospects if after 4 years all we have to look forward to is the possibility of acquiring Glenn or Durant.   Wherefore art though Danny Mac?

Edited by Throw Long Bannatyne
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

Doesn't say much about this regime's ability to scout and recruit QB prospects if

look at some of the guys playing in the NFL. Saw some pretty good dirt balls over the last little while.

Aside from playing qb, finding someone who can play QB must be the hardest job in football. 

 

Edited by Mark F
Posted

To be (a pretentious ELA nerd) or not be be (a pretentious ELA nerd), that is the question.

Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of misuse of the word wherefore,

Or takes arms against misinterpretation and point out' wherefore' actually means 'why'

:P

I agree it is a bummer that the we are constantly picking through the leftovers to bolster our bullpen, and that trend doesn't appear to be changing.

Posted
18 minutes ago, MOBomberFan said:

To be (a pretentious ELA nerd) or not be be (a pretentious ELA nerd), that is the question.

Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of misuse of the word wherefore,

Or takes arms against misinterpretation and point out' wherefore' actually means 'why'

:P

I agree it is a bummer that the we are constantly picking through the leftovers to bolster our bullpen, and that trend doesn't appear to be changing.

"To be or not be be"

Auto-fail.  Better luck next year.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Mark F said:

look at some of the guys playing in the NFL. Saw some pretty good dirt balls over the last little while.

Aside from playing qb, finding someone who can play QB must be the hardest job in football. 

 

Couple that with convincing people to give up on their NFL aspirations for a bit as well.. take a much lower pay as well.. its a tough gig.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...