Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, blue_gold_84 said:

If Heath were that selfish and only cared about making INTs, he wouldn't be a back-to-back All-Star, much less a highly prized potential free agent.

OMG! It's almost as if voters only look at stats........ 

Posted

Interesting Tweet from Travis Bond.... 

“Bond not mobile to play T” but when I did play it in 2016 and 2017 I don’t recall giving up a sack... better check the film again and not look at the outlook buddy?. But I get it it’s your job to stir up something??... thanks for the motivation?

Posted

I love Bond and he deserves to be paid but in our current cap situation I don't think it's plausible to be paying big money for an American Guard. If he was a tackle he would be locked up by now.. but regardless he's going to get paid and he's going to be a huge upgrade to what ever team he goes to. 

Posted (edited)

I'd be in the sign Randle camp for certain. He's been the most reliable corner we've possibly ever had as long as I've been a Bomber fan. Travis Bond is an exceptional American playing a traditionally Canadian position. I can see us getting by without Bond, but being lost in the desert without Randle. Simply put, Bond is a luxury; Randle is a necessity.

Edited by MOBomberFan
Posted
2 minutes ago, Atomic said:

Would have rather let Hardrick walk and roll the dice on Bond as our RT.  I'm quite sure he can do it.

would we want to be without our starting RT (possibly for good) if he lands a gig down south tho?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Atomic said:

Would have rather let Hardrick walk and roll the dice on Bond as our RT.  I'm quite sure he can do it.

I think there will be takers for a CFL All Star RT in a trade.

Posted
3 minutes ago, SPuDS said:

would we want to be without our starting RT (possibly for good) if he lands a gig down south tho?

I have a tough time envisioning Bond getting another NFL shot at nearly 28 years old.  But you're right that is a risk.

Posted
Just now, Atomic said:

I have a tough time envisioning Bond getting another NFL shot at nearly 28 years old.  But you're right that is a risk.

oh me too.. but he could end up on a PR and that team could injure 2 guards in a PS game then boom, hes rostered, possiby for a year and we would have to start considering Neufeld back at tackle if bryant or Hardrick went down. *shudder*

Posted

I'd take Bond over Hardrick and Foketi...

It doesn't have to be a choice between Randle and Bond - other teams can afford to keep their core together.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Floyd said:

I'd take Bond over Hardrick and Foketi...

It doesn't have to be a choice between Randle and Bond - other teams can afford to keep their core together.

Calgary's been the best team in the league since forever, and they lose good players in FA every year. The key to their success is being able to replace good players, not necessarily bringing all the same players back every season.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Floyd said:

I'd take Bond over Hardrick and Foketi...

It doesn't have to be a choice between Randle and Bond - other teams can afford to keep their core together.

No offence at all to Bond, but I'd argue Randle is more of the "core" of this team than Bond. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, TrueBlue said:

No offence at all to Bond, but I'd argue Randle is more of the "core" of this team than Bond. 

Our OL solidified once Bond was inserted at LG...  we are quickly forgetting how average the OL was before that

1 hour ago, sweep the leg said:

Calgary's been the best team in the league since forever, and they lose good players in FA every year. The key to their success is being able to replace good players, not necessarily bringing all the same players back every season.

Totally agree... but we are likely replacing Bond with Neufeld - we're just bringing back the wrong guys imo (Neufeld, Hardrick, Foketi instead of Bond...)

Posted

How many players can the Bombers truly say we have the best at their position in the league?

Probably just Stanley Bryant and Travis Bond.  And it looks like we're going to let one walk.  That's too bad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...