Atomic Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Demski and Coates start, Simonise and Wolitarsky backup. Petermann starts on the PR. Looks good. Goalie, MOBomberFan, rebusrankin and 1 other 4
Goalie Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, Atomic said: Demski and Coates start, Simonise and Wolitarsky backup. Petermann starts on the PR. Looks good. Depth is good. wbbfan and rebusrankin 2
TBURGESS Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 4 minutes ago, wbbfan said: two guys with good and great size and fantastic athletic ability at a position we havent had a strong contributor in years, and may start two nis at. Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot.
Bigblue204 Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 1 minute ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Wasn't Henry cut at mini camp?
wbbfan Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Henry and plamondon were TCF last year. This is how you build depth though. pile up talent and let the best fight to the top. like we did on the OL.
Goalie Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. Just curious.. Who would you have taken and why.
Goalie Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, Bigblue204 said: Wasn't Henry cut at mini camp? Baines was. Bigblue204 1
Atomic Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 (edited) 7 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. So you acknowledge we're shaky at receiver but upset we drafted two receivers. Edited May 4, 2018 by Atomic JCon, BigBlueFanatic, wbbfan and 1 other 1 3
Floyd Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 1 minute ago, TBURGESS said: Our Canuck receivers now include Demski (Good when he's healthy, but not healthy often enough and very expensive), Coates (1 good game), Blazko, Henry, Thera-Plamondon, Wolitarsky (1 catch career), Simonise and Petermann for 2 starting spots, 2 backups and a PR spot. When I start thinking you’re being unnecessarily negative... umm... just sayin ha bearpants 1
rebusrankin Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Blazko may soon be released and Henry and Thera-Plamondon are going to be in tough to make the team. Its like as Atomic stated earlier: Demski and Coates start, Wolitarsky and Simonise backup, Peterman on the PR. Maybe one other NI WR on the PR. wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 1 minute ago, rebusrankin said: Blazko may soon be released and Henry and Thera-Plamondon are going to be in tough to make the team. Its like as Atomic stated earlier: Demski and Coates start, Wolitarsky and Simonise backup, Peterman on the PR. Maybe one other NI WR on the PR. Simonise, wolitarsky and petermann have star potential. TP henry dont. blazko has some potential but not as much.
JuranBoldenRules Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Edmonton scooped us with Tanner Green too. Not a fan of AGD.
JuranBoldenRules Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Thera-Plamandon could be moving to H-back. Can long snap too. Floyd 1
Floyd Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 I really like the dumouchel pick... Great move not the draft I would have done but I don’t hate it Atomic 1
wbbfan Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Edmonton scooped us with Tanner Green too. Not a fan of AGD. green would have been nice yeah. Hes a gigantic man with decent feet. I dont like the idea of him at guard. Just now, Floyd said: I really like the dumouchel pick... Great move not the draft I would have done but I don’t hate it Upside for days. Big and nasty. And he is going back to college.
TBURGESS Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Atomic said: So you acknowledge we're shaky at reveiver but upset we drafted two receivers. I don't mind 1. I don't like 2, especially with our first 2 picks. Not really hard to comprehend.
Mike Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Imagine TBURGESS being negative, I for one am shocked Albertabomberguy, kelownabomberfan, Jpan85 and 1 other 4
WBBFanWest Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Mike said: Imagine TBURGESS being negative, I for one am shocked Been saving it up for a few months now. It's got to feel good to be back at it. Mark F 1
Floyd Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 I’m bummed out because I was fully prepared to make fun of sask for picking simonise... wbbfan 1
Atomic Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Dumouchel has tackle potential but he is a project for sure. 6'9". wbbfan 1
TBURGESS Posted May 4, 2018 Report Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, Mike said: Imagine TBURGESS being negative, I for one am shocked I wasn't negative about the first receiver. I became negative about 2 with the top 2 picks. Imagine having a different opinion than the Bombers and then having to watch the cheerleaders around here complain about it. We've now got 8 NI receivers, only 2 of which have even a little bit of CFL experience. Well 3 if you include Wolo's catch. LOL
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now