Booch Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 doesn't look like it...we have 21 Canadians on the depth chart...and with deletion of Foketti and Bryant that leaves us our 20 imports...
Blueandgold Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 Fogg is at Corner and Alexander is at HB or is that just a misprint? Did Flanders get hurt?
Floyd Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 48 minutes ago, JCon said: Yeah we'll know after one game and couple weeks of practice with a new player whether or not a whole scheme will work. Why not? Rest of the D hasn't really changed - Gaitor replaces Heath and Fenner replaces Leggett - lateral moves... Bighill is the only major upgrade Bighill isn't exactly a raw rookie - we'll see very quickly if Hall's MLB was actually meant to fill gaps or if we spent all last season compensating for Hurl's lack of speed... shadybob 1
JCon Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Floyd said: Why not? Rest of the D hasn't really changed - Gaitor replaces Heath and Fenner replaces Leggett - lateral moves... Bighill is the only major upgrade Bighill isn't exactly a raw rookie - we'll see very quickly if Hall's MLB was actually meant to fill gaps or if we spent all last season compensating for Hurl's lack of speed... Bighill the "QB" of the D. It's not plug and play. There are plenty of variables that go into having a cohesive defence. Just like the o-line, you can have all the talent but they need to learn to work together. SPuDS, blue_gold_84, Bigblue204 and 3 others 6
blue_gold_84 Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 Just now, JCon said: Bighill the "QB" of the D. It's not plug and play. There are plenty of variables that go into having a cohesive defence. Just like the o-line, you can have all the talent but they need to learn to work together. Bighill could be the general the defense needs. He just seems like a natural "lead by example" type and consistently puts his money where his mouth is. And I anticipate he'll be amped tomorrow. Floyd, shadybob, SPuDS and 1 other 4
JCon Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 1 minute ago, blue_gold_84 said: Bighill could be the general the defense needs. He just seems like a natural "lead by example" type and consistently puts his money where his mouth is. And I anticipate he'll be amped tomorrow. Absolutely, I just don't think we can determine the success or failure of the Hall defence on one game. I would say by game 4, we'll know for sure. blue_gold_84 1
sweep the leg Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, Floyd said: Why not? Rest of the D hasn't really changed - Gaitor replaces Heath and Fenner replaces Leggett - lateral moves... Bighill is the only major upgrade Roh replaced Ekakatie as the 7th DL on the roster. Floyd and JuranBoldenRules 1 1
blue_gold_84 Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, JCon said: Absolutely, I just don't think we can determine the success or failure of the Hall defence on one game. I would say by game 4, we'll know for sure. Couldn't agree more. One game is not usually a reasonable measuring stick (maybe a playoff game could be the exception), but that's especially the case with a week 1 season opener. JCon 1
Floyd Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, JCon said: Bighill the "QB" of the D. It's not plug and play. There are plenty of variables that go into having a cohesive defence. Just like the o-line, you can have all the talent but they need to learn to work together. Not sure what you're arguing here... we'll know in the first quarter if Bighill is 'crashing' the DL and plugging 'gaps'... Loffler should actually play safety not hybrid S/MLB We'll see this in Game 1 - I'm definitely not saying it will be a cohesive unit asap but there 'should' absolutely be a difference in Hall's use of the MLB and Safety...
Fatty Liver Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, JCon said: Absolutely, I just don't think we can determine the success or failure of the Hall defence on one game. I would say by game 4, we'll know for sure. Still expect to see a few hiccups until they get accustomed to playing alongside of each other, hopefully this doesn't translate into giving up easy TD's, like in the WSF. JCon 1
JCon Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Floyd said: Not sure what you're arguing here... we'll know in the first quarter if Bighill is 'crashing' the DL and plugging 'gaps'... Loffler should actually play safety not hybrid S/MLB We'll see this in Game 1 - I'm definitely not saying it will be a cohesive unit asap but there 'should' absolutely be a difference in Hall's use of the MLB and Safety... I'm saying that trying to determine how success an entire scheme is based on whether Bighill is in the right place at the right time in his first game is ludicrous. It will take a few games before they function as a cohesive group. We already know that Bighill can tackle and CAN be the MLB based on previous experience. blue_gold_84 1
Booch Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 Have Fenner and Bighill not already have played together in B.C...Gaitor too....I don't think cohesion on defense will be an issue to be honest Floyd, Mark F and rebusrankin 3
Tracker Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Floyd said: Not sure what you're arguing here... we'll know in the first quarter if Bighill is 'crashing' the DL and plugging 'gaps'... Loffler should actually play safety not hybrid S/MLB. We'll see this in Game 1 - I'm definitely not saying it will be a cohesive unit asap but there 'should' absolutely be a difference in Hall's use of the MLB and Safety... There damned well better be. Hall will merit a game or two because of the changes in the defensive personnel, but that's it.
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 I might have dressed another DB over Lankford. TBH I’d probably dress Bryant over him. A fresh DL vs Reilly could be huge. BomberBall 1
Booch Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 and we may still do that....seeing as Fogg is listed as the Kick Returner I am thinking Lankford may sit....and really Demski and Augustine can return kicks too...as well as Dressler but he doesn't need to be taking any unnecessary shots outside of his receiver role
sweep the leg Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: I might have dressed another DB over Lankford. TBH I’d probably dress Bryant over him. A fresh DL vs Reilly could be huge. 8 DL seems like overkill, no?
Mike Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 I’d personally like to see Bryant in and Lankford out. blue85gold and Goalie 2
JCon Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, Booch said: and we may still do that....seeing as Fogg is listed as the Kick Returner I am thinking Lankford may sit....and really Demski and Augustine can return kicks too...as well as Dressler but he doesn't need to be taking any unnecessary shots outside of his receiver role I would have Demski backing up Fogg on return duties. SPuDS 1
Booch Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 Demski and Fogg would both be back together...Usually you have 2 guys there JCon 1
sweep the leg Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, Mike said: I’d personally like to see Bryant in and Lankford out. I wouldn't, because I don't want Fogg doing all returns without an American backup for his spot on D. Fatty Liver, MC and Atomic 2 1
Floyd Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 24 minutes ago, JCon said: I'm saying that trying to determine how success an entire scheme is based on whether Bighill is in the right place at the right time in his first game is ludicrous. It will take a few games before they function as a cohesive group. We already know that Bighill can tackle and CAN be the MLB based on previous experience. You're kind of making my point... he doesn't have to be in the right place all the time but we'll see if he's playing right up against the DL in the first quarter If Bighill is still lining up as a DL/MLB hybrid like Hurl did, we'll see if it was Hurl's speed that hampered Hall... or if Hall was scheming to compensate for Hurl's lack of talent JCon 1
Booch Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 there are other options to do returns on the 46 man other than Lankford
nate007 Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 Esks have 9 Canadians listed as starters. Given that they list three import backups on the DL, I don't expect that Boateng will actually be a 'starter'. if he is, the Bombers should send a tot of runs over to that side.
Floyd Posted June 13, 2018 Report Posted June 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, nate007 said: Esks have 9 Canadians listed as starters. Given that they list three import backups on the DL, I don't expect that Boateng will actually be a 'starter'. if he is, the Bombers should send a tot of runs over to that side. Boateng is not a weak point on that DL...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now