johnzo Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 Noticed last night that when Couture is in for tight end sets, Bowman is the guy subbing out. So Bowman is not only getting fewer targets, he's getting fewer snaps. (love that TSN over-the-huddle camera, makes it so much easier to track lineup changes on O)
Brandon Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 Streveler was distributing the ball to everyone and Bowman still wasn't getting much his way... something is off. wbbfan 1
Fraser Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 I gave up on Bowman when he was open in the end zone but was 2 steps behind the ball because he gave up on his route. I think it was Nichols first game back. Noeller, Tracker, Bigblue204 and 1 other 1 1 2
M.O.A.B. Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 (edited) 0-0 in 3 games now i believe and I dont think he is being double-teamed. Need to put somebody in, Flanders, Thompkins or whoever. Heck, Bakari Grant will be a better pickup right now, if we need a 3rd vet receiver. Put up a quiet 1000+ receiving yards last year. https://www.cfl.ca/players/bakari-grant/158240/ Edited July 22, 2018 by M.O.A.B. Tracker 1
do or die Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 Put me in....I may not do much, but can provide explanations..... Mark H. and M.O.A.B. 2
wbbfan Posted July 22, 2018 Author Report Posted July 22, 2018 1 hour ago, M.O.A.B. said: 0-0 in 3 games now i believe and I dont think he is being double-teamed. Need to put somebody in, Flanders, Thompkins or whoever. Heck, Bakari Grant will be a better pickup right now, if we need a 3rd vet receiver. Put up a quiet 1000+ receiving yards last year. https://www.cfl.ca/players/bakari-grant/158240/ Flanders practiced last week iirc. Would love to see thompkins. And yeah using grant to start an extra NI would be great.
rebusrankin Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 So are we all saying this is the end of the age of Adarius? wbbfan, Tracker, Mark F and 1 other 1 3
wbbfan Posted July 22, 2018 Author Report Posted July 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: So are we all saying this is the end of the age of Adarius? saying it should be. but with this franchise you never know. we have seen far more then our share of lame ducks stick around for far far too long every previous year of this management group. Tracker 1
do or die Posted July 22, 2018 Report Posted July 22, 2018 9 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: So are we all saying this is the end of the age of Adarius? Harmony and understanding....
Goalie Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 I'd go Flanders and if need be use Peterman more. I feel we are a running team and need to keep doing that. Flanders is just another weapon to use. Adams Dressler Demski Peterman Wolitarsky? Why not. wbbfan 1
Tracker Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, do or die said: Harmony and understanding.... No more falsehoods or dirisions... Edited July 23, 2018 by Tracker
bearpants Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 I like Bowman I think he sticks around... I think he'll be useful at some point... that being said, I wouldn't be too upset if he "tweaked" something in the Argo game and finds himself on the 1-game... I'd put in Thompkins or Flanders to give some other guys some opportunities before we just go ahead and dump him... People pointing out that Demski play the "Flanders role" now is irrelevant... we are a run first team... and all of Flander, Harris, and Demski are also proficient pass catchers... having more "swiss-army knife" weapons on the field only makes our offense better.... Blueandgold 1
Blueandgold Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 13 hours ago, Goalie said: I'd go Flanders and if need be use Peterman more. I feel we are a running team and need to keep doing that. Flanders is just another weapon to use. Adams Dressler Demski Peterman Wolitarsky? Why not. I thought Flanders played fairly well as a starting slot last year. I would be happy to see him there again. We could create some excellent chaos having Harris, Flanders, Demski and potentially Streveler all on the field together. Mark F 1
Blueandgold Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 15 minutes ago, bearpants said: I like Bowman I think he sticks around... I think he'll be useful at some point... that being said, I wouldn't be too upset if he "tweaked" something in the Argo game and finds himself on the 1-game... I'd put in Thompkins or Flanders to give some other guys some opportunities before we just go ahead and dump him... People pointing out that Demski play the "Flanders role" now is irrelevant... we are a run first team... and all of Flander, Harris, and Demski are also proficient pass catchers... having more "swiss-army knife" weapons on the field only makes our offense better.... Our O has played it's best with Flanders in the lineup... The guy has done nothing but produce when he's been on the field. You make room for a guy like that. BigBlueFanatic, Bubba Zanetti and bearpants 2 1
TBURGESS Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 Demski is taking the Flanders role and is a NI. IF we replace Bowman, I'd go with a young receiver, not Flanders. Bigblue204 1
Bigblue204 Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, do or die said: ...yup, young CDN one why? We have some talented americans who are better.
Fatty Liver Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 44 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Demski is taking the Flanders role and is a NI. IF we replace Bowman, I'd go with a young receiver, not Flanders. I agree, until Demski or Harris go down there isn't a dire need for Flanders. Tracker 1
bearpants Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 1 hour ago, TBURGESS said: Demski is taking the Flanders role and is a NI. IF we replace Bowman, I'd go with a young receiver, not Flanders. I agree and I would like to see Thompkins in the line up... but I would argue that "young receiver" also describes Flanders... also, Flanders is younger than Thompkins (same age as Washington)... SPuDS 1
AKAChip Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 The problem with inserting Thompkins is that he really isn’t a slot receiver. His skill set is best utilized as an outside deep threat. So if you make that change, you also have to move someone else inside. Washington makes far more sense as a direct replacement. bearpants 1
Albertabomberguy Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 Bowman was just traded to Montreal for a late conditional draft pick Bigblue204 1
Bigblue204 Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 1 minute ago, Albertabomberguy said: Bowman was just traded to Montreal for a late conditional draft pick I honestly can't believe they got anything for him considering his slump and price tag
Albertabomberguy Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 Just announced that the bombers traded bowman to Montreal for a late conditional draft pick
Dr Zaius Posted July 23, 2018 Report Posted July 23, 2018 Haven't been a fan of Bowman, but this isn't a win for us. A conditional 8th? Lol HAS to be cap-related
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now