Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

CFL Game Notes -

CFL.ca

👁‍🗨well, if you go by stats..the Bombers are in for a tough time in Regina.. Ugly, ugly stats

Chris Jones is 46-35 as a HC

Mike O’Shea is 40-42

Sask is 35-19 over Wpg in the Labour Day Classic.

29 of those games have been decided only in the last 3 minutes.

The meetings since 2002 have generally not been all that close - only 5 of the last 16 games were decided in the last 3:00 - Saskatchewan comes into the game with a better record (5-4 vs 5-5) than Winnipeg for the first time since 2014

- QBs: Saskatchewan will start their 4th straight different QB in the Classic, with Zach Collaros; Matt Nichols will start his 3rd in a row  (Nichols started once for Edmonton vs Calgary and threw for 203 yards); Matt Nichols has yet to be held under 300 passing yards; he has 341 & 364 yards in his two Winnipeg LDW starts (16-17)  (Nichols started once for Edmonton vs Calgary and threw for 203 yards)

- Zach Collaros has also yet to be held under 300 passing yards in an LDW game; his three 300+ games were with Hamilton

- Zach Collaros becomes the 38th player to start a Labour Day Weekend game for the Riders; Nichols is starter #39 for Winnipeg

- Winnipeg snapped a Saskatchewan 11-game win streak in their 2016 LD Weekend meeting but dropped to 1 win in 13 last year

- The Riders have outgained Winnipeg in the last 7 LDW meetings by over 100 yards per game (Avg: 388 to 275)

Breaking Down Who Wins LDW Classic: There have been 54 previous games in this LD matchup and here is how it has broken down based on which club came into the game with a better record. The Bombers are 5-5 this year compared to the Riders at 5-4.

WPG came in with better record: 29 times (Wins: SSK 18, WPG 11)

SSK came in with better record: 15 times (Wins: SSK 11, WPG 4) Note: Teams came in with even records 10 times

As the Riders were seeking in 2017, the underdog has often won this LD Weekend matchup. The Bombers have only 4 upset wins as underdogs i.e. the team lower in the standings heading in.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Other Team Notes – Winnipeg at Saskatchewan:

- Charleston Hughes: Leads the CFL with 12 Sacks (7 more than any other player) and comes into this game with a streak of 7 straight games with at least one. That is the longest consecutive games streak in his career, his previous long run was set at 6 in a row from Jun 28/14 to Aug 9/14.

- Most consecutive games with a QB Sack: Over the last 25 years, here are the longest streaks with at least one QB Sack. Charleston Hughes has tied the most by any Saskatchewan player and is 3 short of the highest on record since 1994

👁‍🗨Joe Montford and Philip Hunt are the two players ahead of Hughes, each with 10 game streaks.

- Sam Hurl 100 GP/ U of Calgary: Hurl will suit up this week for CFL game #100 in his career and it will be start #56. He is a prominent member of a remarkable 99 players that have come to the CFL from the Dinos - of those 99 individuals Hurl will become the 20th player of this group to make it to 100 career regular season games.

- Nichols 9-3 .750 coming off a loss: Despite a second straight loss last week, Matt Nichols has had a remarkable run since July 2016 in the next start after a Blue Bombers loss as he will be doing again this week. In his last 12 starts after a Winnipeg defeat the club has gone 9-3 for a .750 winning %.

- Avoiding 3 losses in a row: The Bombers have not lost 3 games in a row in the same season since the final three weeks of 2015. They have gone a span of 46 games with just 5 streaks of 2 defeats in a row and none longer than that.

5 of the last 6: The Riders have beaten Winnipeg just once in the last 6 games. This is the best Bombers' 6-game run against their Saskatchewan rivals in the last 13 years.

Opponents' 502 net yards: The Bombers yielded just 325 net yards per game over their first 8 contests and through Week #9 ranked #4 in the CFL. Since then, they have given up 502 yards per game (493 & 511), the highest in the CFL since Week #9. The main area where this has come is on 1st down plays. First 8 games: 6.3 yards per play, Gm #9-10: 8.3 yards per play.

Riders Sacks Allowed: Saskatchewan allowed 9 Sacks in their first 4 games. Since then in 5 games they have yielded just 3. Expect some 2-&-Outs: The Riders are #1 forcing opponents 62 times into a 2-&-Out. Winnipeg is #3 with 53 forced 2-&-Outs.

- Jovon Johnson: Sat out last week's game and that snapped his consecutive games played streak at 73 in a row.

Andrew Harris: Was held to just 13 yards rushing last week on 7 carries. That tied his lowest yardage since Oct 7/15 vs EDM.

- Josh Bartel Inside the 10: Bartel has 6 punts pinning opponents inside the 10-yard line this year, one off the CFL lead. He is #2 overall with 60 since 2012. Winnipeg's Justin Medlock in many less games is #3 since 2012 with 36 including 7 in 2018.

- Offensive & Defensive TD Same Game: The Riders' Nick Marshall scored a touchdown on offence and defence in the same game two weeks ago with a 3-yard rush and a 67-yard INT return. That specific Offence/Defence TD pair had not occurred since Tyrone Walls for Edmonton on September 4, 1972 a span of 46 years. There have been only 4 such pure occurrences in the last 50 years. Last week, Marshall scored another offensive TD on a short run and actually leads the club in touchdowns with 4.

The nearest since 1972 was Milt Stegall on July 15, 1999 who caught a 37-yard TD pass from Kerwin Bell and returned a blocked punt/fumble 52 yards for a score.

Edited by Mr Dee
Posted (edited)

Bombers gotta get back to their successful ways before this little slide. Saskatchewan is playing some very solid defense and could make it tough for us today if we play like we have been the past couple of weeks. I'm expecting Harris to have a big game and am hoping for Nichols to have a bounce back in the biggest game of the year and bring his confidence back.

Edited by Nolby
Posted

We can all hope for the best, but reality is that this one could get ugly early.

It will help the Bomber cause greatly if they can win or even just keep it close today and then follow that up with a win next week. A close loss here, and a win next week will be key to avoid really going in the tank.

Lose this one big and then lose again next week and it will be lifeless free-fall for the rest of this season.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nolby said:

Bombers gotta get back to their successful ways before this little slide. Saskatchewan is playing some very solid defense and could make it tough for us today if we play like we have been the past couple of weeks. I'm expecting Harris to have a big game and am hoping for Nichols to have a bounce back in the biggest game of the year and bring his confidence back.

Yeah I think the offense can do a little better today.  But expect the torches, pitchforks and calls for Richie Hall's crucifixion to come out full force.

Edited by USABomberfan
Posted
13 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Offense has to play from opening drive.  Take advantage of turnovers provided by defense and protect the ball.  Stay on the field, win field position.  No long lapses.  2nd and 3rd quarter tend to be where they fall apart.

The whole team has to come out ready to play and keep playing the whole 60 minutes. If they get out in front, they need to keep piling it on.  To hell with laying back and protecting a lead.

Against Ottawa, they got punched in the mouth and never responded. This is going to be that type of game and the Bombers NEED to hit back or it’s going to be a very long afternoon.

Posted
1 minute ago, rebusrankin said:

Dressler and Leggett the scratches. I know Dressler was a legit game time decision but Mo is back in Winnipeg, why not put him on the 1 game IR and say add Flanders and use a DI on Flanders for example?

Salary Cap.  Clearly they prefer the DI's on Wild and an extra DB.

Posted
2 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

Dressler and Leggett the scratches. I know Dressler was a legit game time decision but Mo is back in Winnipeg, why not put him on the 1 game IR and say add Flanders and use a DI on Flanders for example?

Our reluctance to play Flanders is mind boggling. I have no idea why they won’t give him a shot to boost our stagnant offence. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Salary Cap.  Clearly they prefer the DI's on Wild and an extra DB.

If the salary cap thing is true thats poor planning. I understand the extra DB but they could make a better use of a DI spot than Wild but hey if we go back and read old posts, we've all had this discussion before about MOS and his poor use of DI spots.

Posted
1 minute ago, rebusrankin said:

If the salary cap thing is true thats poor planning. I understand the extra DB but they could make a better use of a DI spot than Wild but hey if we go back and read old posts, we've all had this discussion before about MOS and his poor use of DI spots.

What I mean is that they'd have to pay someone a game cheque on the 46 if they moved Leggett off the 46 to the 1-game IR.  Doesn't make much sense.  If Flanders came on they'd probably cut Wild or a DB and add them to the PR.

Posted (edited)

The venerable Winnipeg Blue Bomber squad is going to annihilate the crappy green team. Green is probably the ugliest colour in the universe, their fans suck. The town sucks. Everything about that place is a crap hole, including the toilet stadium. So much manure around town fans try and share it with the players. It’s an awful incestuous mud pit. The sk posters posters that post here suck and their cousins suck, their cousins. Slow learners because of DNA. Every school bus 🚌 is special. National Geopgraphic has printed photos of sk people licking themselves. 

It just occurred to me. The hosts for today’s game don’t have the name of the game correct. Idiots! Tomorrow is Labour Day.

Edited by Rod Black
Posted

We just need to play a clean game..dont give the ball away in our end to help out the sad sack sask offence..no special teams TDs against.

I think we can put up 20..25 points.. cant see sask getting 20 unless we crap the bed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...